Korean banks see over $1.5B outflow in funds to crypto market

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

$120M Crypto Ponzi Scheme Exposed in IndiaIn a recent crackdown, local authorities in the state of Odisha in India, have dismantled a massive $120 million cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme.That’s according to a report by local news agency ANI earlier this week. The operation led by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the state police has resulted in the arrest of key individuals orchestrating the fraudulent endeavor. This latest development underscores the growing concerns around cryptocurrency scams and their detrimental impact on investors.Photo by Ayiman Mohanty on UnsplashSTA crypto tokenThe mastermind behind the Ponzi scheme had adeptly evaded capture by frequently changing locations. The scheme, operating across India, revolved around the STA crypto token, a digital asset at the heart of the fraudulent activities.Similar to the infamous OneCoin scandal, where billions were swindled from unsuspecting investors, the STA token scheme exploited victims who had invested in the token and then recruited others under the guise of a multi-level marketing initiative. Promised bonuses and extravagant returns were used as bait to lure individuals into the scheme, which eventually unraveled, leaving numerous investors financially devastated.Unregulated token offeringReports highlight that the STA token was not authorized by any regulatory body. This glaring absence of oversight enabled the scammers to continue their operations unchecked. The nature of the scheme involved recruiting victims in various Indian states who were promised substantial returns. These victims, in turn, were enticed to bring in new investors, creating a vicious cycle of recruitment and investment.The investigation into the scheme revealed that the STA token offering attracted individuals through aggressive promotional strategies. This allowed the scheme to establish a vast network across India, involving approximately 200,000 individuals. The victims were led to believe that their investments would yield significant bonuses and returns, a tactic that echoes the tactics used by OneCoin promoters.False claimsThe STA token was introduced in September 2021 and rapidly established a presence on social media platforms, presenting itself as a legitimate cryptocurrency. It falsely claimed to be a blockchain-based platform connecting users with local farmers. This facade lent an air of legitimacy to the scheme, effectively deceiving unsuspecting investors.The scheme’s audacity was further highlighted by a grand event hosted by STA criminal promoters in a luxurious hotel in Goa. This extravagant affair aimed to further legitimize the project and attract more victims.This incident adds to a series of cryptocurrency-related scams that have plagued India. The GainBitcoin scam, which came to light last year, led to the loss of over $1.25 billion for around 100,000 victims. The Indian authorities have responded by issuing public advisories warning citizens against falling victim to such schemes that promise quick wealth through cryptocurrency investments.In a recent parliamentary session, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary revealed that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is actively investigating multiple instances of cryptocurrency-related fraud. These investigations have uncovered proceeds of crime amounting to over $130 million.

Dubai-based crypto exchange Bybit said it will temporarily pause the onboarding of new users in Japan as it adjusts to regulatory changes under the country’s Financial Services Agency (FSA). In a statement released on Oct. 30, the company explained that the suspension is part of its effort to reassess compliance obligations and align with upcoming local standards. Starting Oct. 31 at 12:00 p.m. UTC, Bybit will no longer accept new account registrations from Japanese nationals or residents. The company added that the change will not affect existing customers, whose services will remain uninterrupted for now. The decision landed amid a shifting domestic policy backdrop. Policymakers at the FSA have been weighing the treatment of crypto assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, viewing digital tokens through the lens of investment products. Officials have pointed to sharp price volatility and cyber-theft risks as reasons to strengthen safeguards for depositors and insured individuals.Photo by Cosmin Georgian on UnsplashBanks and insurers face ban on crypto salesAccording to an Asahi Shimbun report cited by Yonhap News, the FSA is set to prepare a draft framework that would bar banks and insurance companies from selling crypto directly, while permitting sales through brokerage firms. The draft was said to be slated for submission to the regular Diet session next year. In order to preserve a level competitive field, the authority plans to allow securities arms of banks and insurers to distribute tokens, given that online brokerages already offer crypto exposure. The same report suggested that banks and insurers could be allowed to hold and manage crypto assets once adequate risk management systems were in place. Market developments have continued alongside the policy work. Reuters reported that a yen-pegged stablecoin called JPYC launched on Oct. 27, issued by a company of the same name and backed by domestic savings and Japanese government bonds. An earlier Nikkei article had signaled that regulatory approval was expected, leaving timing as the main open question until the debut. Economic stimulus at odds with rate hike talkBroader macroeconomic policy has also been in focus for crypto investors. Some analysts have argued that an economic stimulus package announced by Japan’s newly elected Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi could channel fresh capital into markets and, by extension, provide a tailwind for Bitcoin. On social media platform X, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes suggested that additional government support for households and businesses might propel the largest cryptocurrency toward the $1 million mark. Monetary policy remains a counterweight. The Bank of Japan kept its benchmark rate at 0.5% on Oct. 30, which led to a weaker yen and boosted demand for government bonds. According to Reuters, Governor Kazuo Ueda indicated that wage trends would guide the next step, leaving open the possibility of a rate increase as early as December. Higher interest rates typically raise borrowing costs and can damp risk appetite, dynamics that often weigh on speculative assets such as cryptocurrencies. Investors are watching how Japan’s evolving rulebook, fiscal support, and cautious monetary tightening intersect—and how that mix ultimately shapes crypto participation and pricing in one of Asia’s most closely observed markets.