Top

Mainland Chinese restrictions impact BTC and ETH ETFs in Hong Kong

Policy & Regulation·April 29, 2024, 4:59 AM

Recent developments in the cryptocurrency market reveal that mainland Chinese citizens will face restrictions in purchasing Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in Hong Kong. This restriction stems from China's ban on crypto transactions, which has been in effect for several years. Bloomberg data analyst Jack Wang highlighted this issue, indicating that the upcoming launch of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong will not facilitate market access for investors in mainland China.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/c23a528da5197012b841a422f6f9129d.webp
Photo by Traxer on Unsplash

Spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs approved in Hong Kong

Despite Hong Kong's approval of spot BTC and ETH ETFs, major Chinese asset managers such as China Asset Management, Harvest Global Investments, and Bosera have established these products through their Hong Kong subsidiaries. However, despite their close ties with mainland China, these ETF issuers are unable to offer Bitcoin or Ether exposure to investors within the jurisdiction due to regulatory constraints.

 

Exclusion of mainland Chinese investors

Wang emphasized during a Bloomberg webinar that mainland Chinese citizens will not be able to participate in these ETFs, citing a statement from the Chinese State Council issued in September 2021. This statement prohibits financial institutions from engaging in crypto-related transactions, including account creation, fund transfers, and clearing services. As a result, Chinese investors are unlikely to engage with these products in the short term.

 

Impact on regulatory environment and market access

Wang expressed skepticism about the potential impact of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong on the regulatory environment in mainland China. He stated that the launch of these ETFs is unlikely to open the crypto market to Chinese investors in the foreseeable future. Thomas Zhu, head of digital assets at China Asset Management, noted that the eligibility of mainland Chinese investors to acquire crypto ETFs in Hong Kong depends on forthcoming regulatory modifications. He highlighted the Mainland-Hong Kong Stock Connect, which allows mainland investors to trade eligible Hong Kong stocks and ETFs since 2014.

 

Comparison with U.S. Bitcoin ETF market

Despite optimism surrounding the launch of spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong, Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart drew attention to the significant difference in market size between the U.S. and Hong Kong ETF markets. Seyffart pointed out that Bitcoin ETFs in the United States have more assets than all ETFs in Hong Kong combined, emphasizing the vast disparity in market scale and impact. As the launch date for spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong approaches, stakeholders continue to monitor regulatory developments and market dynamics closely.

 

More to Read
View All
Markets·

Dec 30, 2023

OKX delisting sparks privacy coin price slump

In a move announced on Friday, OKX, the Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange, declared its decision to delist 20 trading pairs by Jan. 5, triggering a notable price fall for major privacy coins such as Monero, Dash and ZCash. The exchange cited that the affected pairs did not align with its listing criteria, though specific details were not disclosed.Photo by Khara Woods on UnsplashPrivacy coin delisting trendWhile OKX did not explicitly articulate the rationale behind this move, industry observers are speculating that it could be part of the exchange’s broader efforts to comply with evolving regulatory measures. Privacy coins have increasingly drawn regulatory scrutiny due to concerns about potential illicit activities within the crypto space. Earlier in the year, Binance had also announced the delisting of several privacy coins to ensure compliance with local laws and regulations. The broader context of regulatory pressures on privacy-focused cryptocurrencies seems to be impacting major exchanges’ decisions. In 2022, Huobi cited regulatory pressures when it took the decision to delist Monero and other privacy coins. Kraken was further ahead of the curve still, delisting Monero for UK customers in November 2021. Downward price actionFollowing OKX’s announcement on Friday, the prices of privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, notably Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), experienced a decline. The entire sector of “privacy cryptos” has witnessed a 7.1% decrease in overall market capitalization, according to an index of such coins compiled by Malaysian crypto indexing firm CoinGecko. During this period, Monero and Zcash have seen unit price declines of 4.5% and 10.7%, respectively. Other tokens set for delisting, including Dash, Powerpool and Horizen, have recorded declines of up to 14%. OKX has provided guidance to users, advising them to cancel orders related to the affected trading pairs before the delisting date to avoid automatic cancellation, a process that may take 1–3 working days. Concurrently, the exchange has halted deposits for the impacted cryptocurrencies and plans to cease withdrawals by Mar. 5, 2024, affording holders sufficient time to withdraw their assets. However, once the delisting is complete, trading these digital assets on OKX will become impossible. Interestingly, certain privacy coins like MINA continue to be listed on the exchange, experiencing a 7.5% increase following the delisting announcement. It’s crucial to note that OKX’s delisting is not exclusive to privacy tokens, as it also includes other trading pairs associated with digital assets such as Kusama, Flow, Kyber Network and Aragon. The fight for privacySome crypto community members have voiced their concerns on social media, with many fearing that the innovation may be ‘captured’ by the various state authorities over time. However, ex-Monero developer Ricardo Spagni (AKA “Fluffypony”) was nonchalant about the whole thing, judging by his comments. In a post on social media platform X, he wrote: ”Monero users and contributors literally couldn’t care less about delistings at this point.” As the regulatory landscape evolves, cryptocurrency exchanges are navigating these challenges, impacting the availability and value of specific tokens on their platforms. Investors and privacy advocates alike will be closely watching how such regulatory compliance measures continue to shape the crypto market and crypto use.  

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Oct 18, 2023

Infinite Block Launches Ethereum Staking Service for Corporations

Infinite Block Launches Ethereum Staking Service for CorporationsSouth Korean blockchain fintech company Infinite Block announced on Monday (local time) that it has opened a custody-based Ethereum staking service offering corporate clients the ability to earn passive income through their Ethereum holdings.Photo by Choong Deng Xiang on Unsplash“This launch is significant as it is the first-ever staking service exclusively for corporations in the domestic blockchain industry, lowering the technological barriers to blockchain access,” said Jeong Gu-tae, CEO of Infinite Block.Secure Ethereum stakingThe service will be offered on the company’s proprietary custody platform KARBON, and businesses can stake their Ethereum holdings and share a 4% annual yield of their investment with KARBON at an agreed ratio. They can benefit from the security and convenience of earning rewards during the staking period without ever having to entrust their custodial assets to an external wallet address, the company said.Customers utilizing KARBON will not only have access to secure storage of their assets but will also be able to save on fees through staking.“Starting with Ethereum, we will gradually expand our staking services, focusing on highly reliable virtual assets,” Jeong explained.Boosting credibilityThis comes after the company obtained ISO 27001 certification for the information security management system of its upcoming blockchain platform from Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance (LRQA), a UK-based global assurance provider.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 25, 2023

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNX

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNXMark Lamb, the co-founder of failed crypto derivatives and yield platform CoinFLEX, has asserted that creditors of the company cannot interfere with OPNX, a Seychelles-incorporated company that Lamb has co-founded with Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the founders of failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashFallout following writIt emerged in October that a group of CoinFLEX creditors had filed a writ of summons in the High Court of Hong Kong, claiming that OPNX, a new crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform linked to CoinFLEX, was established using CoinFLEX assets without their consent. While incorporated in the Seychelles, CoinFLEX ran its operations from Hong Kong.The writ alleges that Mark Lamb misappropriated assets, diverted clients and business opportunities and engaged in actions harmful to creditors during his tenure.The creditors argue that Lamb, while serving as CoinFLEX’s CEO, simultaneously devoted time and effort to setting up OPNX, contrary to his responsibilities. The allegations include diverting assets, falsely representing OPNX’s association with CoinFLEX creditors, disclosing confidential trade secrets and soliciting employees to move to OPNX.The legal action — filed by two companies, Liquidity Technologies and Liquidity Technologies Software — claims that OPNX’s formation was unauthorized and harmful to CoinFLEX creditors. Despite CoinFLEX’s terms of service requiring dispute resolution through arbitration in Hong Kong, the allegations have not been proven in the High Court of Hong Kong.Lamb addresses ‘Twitter FUD’In response to these creditor actions, earlier this week, Lamb took to X (formerly Twitter) to address what he termed as “Twitter FUD.” Lamb wrote:“The Hong Kong court ruled that the few CoinFLEX creditors behind recent ‘FUD’ must not disrupt or interfere with OPNX in any way — and their legal counsel has subsequently stopped representing them.”Lamb added that he hoped that CoinFLEX’s 4,800 creditors would choose the path that he has proposed on the basis that it “maximizes value.”OPNX has defended its position, emphasizing that it provided an opportunity for creditors to sell their claims on the exchange for quick cash, benefiting them. Davies and Zhu have pledged to donate their share of the profit to 3AC creditors.In February, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, announced the rebranding of CoinFLEX to Open Exchange (OPNX). However, the writ of summons claims that OPNX is a separate entity not authorized by CoinFLEX creditors. Leslie Lamb followed up in April by claiming backing from well-known entities in crypto venture capital, only for many of those mentioned to immediately refute such claims.The dispute has also implicated Roger Ver, a well-known character in the crypto space otherwise referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver, a significant individual customer, was accused of defaulting by CoinFLEX. Ver denied defaulting and claimed that CoinFLEX used his trading positions against him, leading to a court-ordered arbitration.OPNX, since its launch in April, has obtained a Lithuanian license for spot trading in the EU and currently processes substantial daily trading volumes. Criminal and civil proceedings against OPNX co-founders Davies and Zhu are ongoing. The situation remains fluid as the legal dispute unfolds.

news
Loading