Tiger Brokers brings online crypto trading to Hong Kong

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

Kiln, the Paris-based Ethereum staking platform, has successfully secured $17 million in a recent funding round, as revealed in a press release on Thursday. Round led by 1kxThe financing round was spearheaded by 1kx, with participation from Crypto.com, Wintermute Ventures, Thailand’s KXVC and Hong Kong’s LBank and IOSG. This infusion of capital brings Kiln's total funding to $35 million, marking a milestone in the company's growth trajectory. The latest funding follows a previous investment of $17.6 million in 2022 from Illuminate Financial, LeadBlock Partners, Sparkle Ventures, Alven and Blue Yard Capital, among others. Kiln opted not to disclose the valuation associated with the recent funding round. In 2021, Canadian blockchain infrastructure and staking firm Figment reached unicorn status with a $1.4 billion valuation. The Kiln platform has witnessed significant growth, increasing its staked assets under management to $4.2 billion in 2023. Acknowledging that growth on Jan. 4, Fred Lardieg, partner at Abu Dhabi sovereign fund Mubadala wrote:”This little-known French startup called @Kiln_finance has been killing it in the #Ethereum #Staking space, by relentlessly releasing new features throughout 2023. They're now the #1 operator of Ethereum validator nodes according to @ratedw3b.” The firm’s expansion is attributed to strategic integrations with various custody solutions, wallets and exchanges over the past year.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashRegional headquarters in SingaporeThe funds raised will be instrumental in facilitating Kiln's global expansion initiatives, including the establishment of its Asia-Pacific (APAC) headquarters in Singapore during the first quarter of the year. Additionally, the company aims to allocate resources for further product development to enhance its offerings in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space. Laszlo Szabo, CEO and co-founder of Kiln, articulated the company's mission, stating: "Our mission is to democratize value creation in the digital assets ecosystem, providing millions of users with easy access to rewards through our platform." The funds will support Kiln's commitment to making value creation in the digital assets space more accessible globally. The company plans to use the funding not only for expansion but also to introduce additional reward mechanisms in the rapidly evolving DeFi landscape. Regulatory uncertaintyWhile Ethereum staking offers users the opportunity to earn yields by validating transactions on the blockchain, the regulatory landscape remains uncertain. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken legal action against several exchanges involved in crypto staking, with SEC Chairman Gary Gensler expressing views on Ethereum-like tokens as potential securities. Despite regulatory challenges, Kiln's staking platform caters to institutional clients, allowing them to stake assets and offer white-label solutions to their customers. With a focus on proof-of-stake blockchains, Kiln holds a significant portion of staked assets on Ethereum, exceeding $3.1 billion, according to its Dune Analytics dashboard. 1kx Founding Partner Christopher Heymann emphasized the increasing role of financial institutions in the crypto space, stating:  "Financial institutions will become a dominant force in crypto, leveraging the immense market opportunity as they stake on behalf of their customers." By utilizing smart contracts, Kiln allows users to stake smaller amounts, overcoming the traditional barrier of a 32 ETH minimum requirement for native ether staking. This approach aligns with Kiln's goal of fostering inclusivity in the rapidly expanding world of decentralized finance.  

Asian Firms Feature in Ledger’s Institutional Trading OfferingCrypto hardware storage device provider Ledger has recently introduced the Ledger Enterprise Tradelink network with the participation of a number of well-known Asian crypto platforms.Through its Ledger Enterprise Tradelink offering, Ledger aims to provide a robust and open trading platform specifically designed for institutional investors. The company announced its move into the institutional trading technology market via a blog post published to its website on Wednesday.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashMeeting institutional needsThis platform aims to meet the unique risk management and regulatory requirements of institutions seeking to participate in the cryptocurrency market.Given recent events, such as the bankruptcy of the FTX crypto exchange, market participants are increasingly seeking transparency and alternatives to traditional vertically integrated crypto exchanges. There are also concerns regarding the future of market infrastructure in light of the recent lawsuits filed by US regulators against major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase.Sebastien Badault, the VP of Metaverse & NFTs at Ledger, highlighted these concerns and emphasized the importance of addressing them. He explained that the Ledger Enterprise Tradelink network enables a seamless connection between custodians, OTC brokers, and exchanges, allowing traders to execute trades without having to hold funds on the exchange itself.This unique feature serves to minimize the risks associated with centralized exchanges. Badault further predicted that as regulations evolve, fund managers will likely be required to distribute their risk across multiple custodial partners, making the Ledger network an appealing solution.Asian partnershipsTo bring the enterprise-grade platform to life, Ledger has partnered with several prominent crypto exchanges and broker firms. These include international companies like Bitstamp, Uphold, CEX.IO, Wintermute, Coinsquare, NDAX, Damex, Flowdesk, and YouHodler. Additionally, Asian platforms feature strongly, represented by the likes of Seychelles-headquartered crypto exchange Huobi, Singapore-based platform Crypto.com, and Thailand’s Bitazza, a digital asset platform.Other participating companies comprise of Komainu, a digital asset custodian backed by Japanese financial services company Nomura, Tokyo-based institution-facing crypto finance firm, Crypto Garage and Hong Kong’s Kryptodian, a digital asset custodian.Other international partners include digital asset custodians TetraTrust and Etana. The partnership depth that Ledger has put in place with its Ledger Enterprise Tradelink product ensures that firms utilizing the network are not locked into a single custodial provider.Crypto.com President & COO, Eric Anziani, praised Ledger’s innovative Trading Operation technology, emphasizing its role in enhancing security and fostering a regulation-friendly landscape for institutional trading. The collaboration with Ledger enables Crypto.com to participate in the Ledger Enterprise Tradelink network, expanding their offerings for institutional clients and strengthening their position within the market.Ledger Enterprise offers real-time tracking of collateral balances and operational status for all participants, providing enhanced transparency and operational efficiency. Furthermore, the platform boasts zero transaction fees, making it a cost-effective solution for institutional investors, as highlighted in the press release.This initiative by Ledger aligns with the industry’s growing demand for regulatory compliance and effective risk management solutions. Consequently, Ledger’s entrance into this space marks an important milestone in facilitating institutional participation and driving further adoption of cryptocurrencies.