Tiger Brokers brings online crypto trading to Hong Kong

Korean Supreme Court acquits Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyungThe Supreme Court of South Korea, in a significant ruling on Thursday (local time), acquitted Song Chi-hyung, chairman and principal stakeholder of Dunamu, of fraud and forgery charges, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. This ruling is particularly noteworthy because Dunamu is the operator of the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.This decision, led by Justice Oh Kyung-mi, marks the culmination of a legal battle that began with Song’s indictment in Dec. 2018, and it extends to the acquittal of the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the head of the Data Value Team, who were jointly indicted.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBackground of the caseSong Chi-hyung and his colleagues were alleged to have fabricated an account on Upbit between September and November 2017. They had been accused of feigning the deposit of assets valued at KRW 122.1 billion and then employing these fictitious funds to enable transactions among actual members.The prosecution also leveled fraud charges against them, claiming that the fabricated account was utilized to sell 11,550 bitcoins to 26,000 members, thereby generating KRW 149.1 billion.The Seoul Southern District Court, acting as the court of first instance, found them not guilty. The court reasoned that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to establish that the defendants actually deposited the assets in the account.Issues with the prosecution’s evidence gatheringThe Seoul High Court, serving as the appellate court, identified problems with the evidence provided by the prosecution, determining that part of it lacked credibility due to improper collection methods. Notably, the court observed that the prosecution had directed Dunamu employees to access their Amazon cloud server to download the account’s transaction history. However, since this remote server was not included in the search and seizure warrant, the court highlighted the illegitimacy of the evidence.The appellate court also pointed out another issue with the evidence: documents stored on the CFO’s USB drive. The prosecution did not follow the legitimate search process, which requires them to extract only data related to the allegations. Moreover, the prosecutors did not present a warrant when confiscating the laptop of the Data Value Team’s lead, further undermining the credibility of their evidence.The court further stated that even if the remaining evidence provided by the prosecution was considered viable, it was still insufficient to substantiate the prosecution’s accusations.The prosecution, disagreeing with the decision of the appeals court, had escalated the case to the Supreme Court. However, the highest court in the nation sided with the ruling of the appeals court, effectively upholding the decision made at the appellate level.

In a recent announcement OPNX, the Seychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency bankruptcy claims platform co-founded by the creators of the now-defunct hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), has revealed its decision to cease all operations.Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashFebruary 14 shutdownIn a message to its users, subsequently shared on social media on Thursday, the OPNX team expressed its commitment to ensuring an orderly closure, urging users to settle all positions by Feb. 7 and withdraw their funds from the platform before Feb. 14, as all withdrawal functionality will be disabled thereafter. The team expressed gratitude to the OPNX community, acknowledging their dedication and trust throughout the platform's existence. Short for "Open Exchange," OPNX served as both a hybrid bankruptcy claims platform and a crypto exchange, enabling users to trade creditor claims of bankrupt crypto companies. The origin of OPNX can be linked to two defunct crypto entities — Coinflex and 3AC. Seychelles-based Coinflex was a crypto yield platform that was forced to suspend withdrawals in June 2022. It subsequently entered into a bankruptcy process. Coinflex co-founder Mark Lamb joined forces with 3AC’s Kyle Davies and Su Zhu to found OPNX. In October, Coinflex creditors sued Lamb, alleging that he had appropriated Coinflex's intellectual property, customer base, employees and technology to establish OPNX. Mired in problemsWithin its short existence, OPNX has been mired in problems. From the very outset, there was little goodwill for the new venture, given that many crypto sector participants took a dim view of Zhu and Davies due to the turmoil the collapse of 3AC caused within the industry. In April of last year, OPNX claimed to have significant venture capital backing, only for many of the VC entities mentioned to quickly deny such claims subsequently. The following month, the local regulator in Dubai, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority, formally reprimanded the OPNX founders for promoting an unregulated business within the Emirate of Dubai. In August, it emerged that VARA had hit OPNX and its founders with a hefty fine. Following the closure announcement, the native OX token of OPNX experienced a significant price decline. Over the course of the past 24 hours, the token unit price has fallen 13.6% to $0.007981. The failure of 3AC led to Teneo, the firm responsible for liquidating 3AC's assets, subpoenaing Zhu and Davies for concealing details of their physical whereabouts through messages on social media platform X. The closure of OPNX adds to the challenges faced by Zhu and Davies, as Teneo is actively seeking to recover $1.3 billion directly from the co-founders. The claim asserts that Zhu and Davies engaged in substantial leverage with investor funds after the insolvency of their hedge fund. In September 2023, Singapore's central bank issued nine-year prohibition orders against Davies and Zhu, citing alleged violations of the country's securities laws at Three Arrows Capital. All the while, crypto community sentiment remains negative where OPNX and its founders are concerned. Taking to social media, Ikigai Asset Management’s Travis Kling didn’t mince his words, stating:”I mean it from the bottom of my heart when I say **** these criminals.” As OPNX concludes its operations, the unfolding events surrounding its co-founders and their association with the failed hedge fund continue to draw attention to the need for the industry to raise its standards.  

Chinese financial industry groups have warned that illegal fundraising and fraud are increasingly emerging through stablecoins, airdrops, real-world asset (RWA) tokens, and crypto mining schemes, according to a Dec. 5 notice carried by the state-run Xinhua News Agency.Photo by Othman Alghanmi on UnsplashThe joint warning was issued by seven major bodies: the National Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association, the Securities Association of China, the Asset Management Association of China, the China Futures Association, the China Association for Public Companies, and the Payment & Clearing Association of China. These groups stated that such products are being used to drive speculative trading, pyramid schemes, and other illicit activities that threaten financial stability. They stressed that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in China and do not share the legal status of fiat currency, further noting that regulators have not approved any RWA tokenization activities. Crypto and RWA offerings prohibitedConsequently, the notice bars member institutions from directly or indirectly providing services related to the issuance or trading of cryptocurrencies or RWA tokens. The associations also urged members to intensify risk warnings and investor education, while encouraging the public to report suspected violations. This industry alert follows the central bank’s recent reiteration of its concerns regarding speculative crypto activity. According to Reuters, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) last month restated its ban on crypto-related business, citing a resurgence in speculation and compliance gaps in stablecoins that complicate risk management. The central bank plans to tighten enforcement against unlawful operations, reinforcing the blanket ban on crypto transactions and mining imposed in September 2021. Old Bitcoin loan feud resurfacesDespite this restrictive framework, disputes tied to legacy crypto dealings continue to surface. Cryptopolitan reported that a long-running controversy has re-emerged surrounding Li Feng, a co-founder of Moore Threads, a Chinese GPU designer widely viewed as a homegrown rival to Nvidia. According to Cryptopolitan, the scrutiny follows the company's Dec. 5 debut on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, where it raised 8 billion yuan ($1.1 billion). Reportedly, Li faces accusations of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin allegedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing. Citing a Foresight News post referenced by analyst AB Kuai.Dong on X, the report indicates that Li and angel investor Xue Manzi launched a cryptocurrency in 2017, raising 5,000 ETH. According to the outlet, Li has been accused of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin that he purportedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing. Xu is said to have raised the issue publicly and sought resolution through legal proceedings in both China and the U.S. However, the legal ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies at the time was viewed as a major obstacle to settlement. Li, for his part, has characterized Xu’s contribution as a failed investment. The situation took a constructive turn when Xu reposted AB Kuai.Dong’s post, saying observers should look past old disputes. Xu encouraged a focus on constructive industry growth and stated that debt matters should be left to legal channels, offering goodwill toward fellow entrepreneurs. The timing of the renewed dispute alongside recent industry warnings highlights a consistent focus on risk control and legal clarity within China’s digital asset space. Authorities continue to emphasize investor protection and formal reporting channels to curb speculation, while market participants are increasingly turning to legal avenues to resolve legacy issues. These developments point to a sector still wrestling with unresolved disputes and regulatory gaps, underscoring the need for clearer rules for both regulators and entrepreneurs.