Gate.HK ceases operations and withdraws license application in Hong Kong

Binance APAC Head Resigns Amid Regulatory ChallengesThe uncertainty swirling around Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, continues as Binance Head of Asia Pacific (APAC), Leon Foong, has resigned from his position.The resignation was reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, with the publication citing people familiar with the matter. Foong played a pivotal role in expanding Binance’s reach across markets like South Korea, Thailand, and Japan.Photo by Marten Bjork on UnsplashRecent pattern of executive exitsFoong’s departure is the latest one in a series of high-profile exits in recent months. Chief Strategy Officer Patrick Hillman and General Counsel Hon Ng are among those who have previously left, as regulatory authorities worldwide tighten their grip on Binance.Binance has been navigating a challenging period as regulatory crackdowns sweep across the global crypto space, prompting strategic shifts and senior leadership changes. Foong’s departure may also signify the company’s effort to realign itself in the face of mounting scrutiny.Market share under pressureThe regulatory backlash has not only led to senior leadership changes but has also impacted Binance’s market share. As authorities have clamped down on Binance due to alleged violations, the exchange’s dominance in the crypto trading market has diminished.Losses of key banking partnerships have compelled some customers to migrate to rival platforms. In some cases, Binance has simply been forced to retreat entirely from offering services in certain jurisdictions.Over the course of a period of three months earlier this year, the company lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Cyprus. French authorities are investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.In recent days, the global exchange platform has also come under pressure relative to the service it extends to Russian users. A Wall Street Journal exposé published last week alleged that Binance’s activities in Russia were in breach of sanctions imposed by the United States. Binance responded by removing the option for customers to transact over the platform using two sanctioned banks. It’s now understood that the company is considering going a step further and exiting that market entirely.LawsuitsBinance’s legal woes began with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filing a lawsuit against the exchange, along with its billionaire Founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ). The lawsuit alleged violations of derivatives regulations and criticized the firm’s compliance procedures. Binance reacted by expressing surprise and disappointment over the legal action.The challenges continued with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing a lawsuit against Binance and CZ in June, accusing the exchange of running unregistered exchanges and engaging in various other violations. Binance has consistently contested these allegations from both the CFTC and the SEC.In response to these challenges, CZ took to X (formerly Twitter) in July to reaffirm the exchange’s commitment to growth despite the setbacks.More concern has been created due to the recent filing by the SEC of a motion “under seal” in its case against Binance. That option is usually taken to prevent public knowledge of sensitive information, which possibly could relate to a parallel investigation from the US Justice Department.There’s likely to be no letup in the cloud that hangs over the business until all enforcement actions and lawsuits have run their course.

The U.S. Department of Justice said on Dec. 2 that it had seized the web domain tickmilleas.com, which was used to facilitate cryptocurrency investment fraud (CIF) schemes, adding to two others seized last month as part of actions against the same Burma-based network. According to the announcement, the domains were operated by scammers based in Kyaukhat, Burma, who presented the site as a legitimate investment platform in order to solicit deposits from victims.Photo by Markus Spiske on UnsplashPromises of high returns as baitVictims who reported the activity to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) indicated that the recently seized website displayed fabricated investment returns and showed purported deposits credited to their online accounts. These figures appeared during guided walkthroughs of falsified trades, creating the appearance of a functioning platform. The Justice Department said the domain seizures are among the first actions taken since it established its first district-level CIF strike force, known as the Scam Center Strike Force, three weeks earlier. The unit operates under the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. According to the DOJ, the group behind the scheme is known as the Tai Chang scam compound. The network is described as being affiliated with the Democratic Karen Benevolent Army (DKBA) in Burma, Trans Asia International Holding Group Thailand Company Limited, and other entities. The U.S. Treasury listed these parties as specially designated nationals on Nov. 12, citing their ties to Chinese organized crime and their involvement in developing scam hubs across Southeast Asia. Russia probes crypto briberyWhile the U.S. case focused on fraud targeting individual investors, a separate development in Russia involved alleged corruption tied to cryptocurrency. DL News, citing a local media report, said Russian prosecutors are seeking to seize a portfolio of luxury assets linked to Georgy Satyukov, a fugitive former employee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, after investigators concluded he had accepted illicit payments in Bitcoin and Ethereum, described as the world’s largest cryptocurrencies. Russian authorities allege that between March and October 2021, Satyukov received $184 million in Bitcoin and $30 million in Ethereum from operators of the failed WEX crypto exchange in return for shielding them from a criminal investigation. WEX had taken over the operations of the BTC-e trading platform in 2017. Investigators say Satyukov liquidated much of his cryptocurrency holdings and used the proceeds to purchase residential and commercial properties in several cities, as well as high-end cars, luxury watches, and jewelry. They have identified $29.6 million in assets believed to be linked to the alleged bribes, which could be transferred to the Federal Treasury if prosecutors win a conviction. The U.S. domain seizures and the separate corruption investigation in Russia illustrate the varied ways cryptocurrency has been implicated in recent criminal cases. Both developments underscore the continued attention authorities are giving to the risks surrounding digital assets. 

South Korea is expected to lift its prohibition on initial coin offerings (ICOs), permitting companies to raise funds through digital token sales for the first time since 2017. The move would mark a reversal of the country’s strict regulatory stance, which was originally implemented to curb speculation and protect investors. Regulators had imposed the blanket ban citing a proliferation of projects with unclear fundamentals, fraud, and a lack of safeguards. Authorities at the time noted that unlike initial public offerings (IPOs)—which price shares based on corporate earnings and growth potential—ICOs lacked established standards for valuing the tokens themselves, making them difficult to assess.Photo by micheile henderson on UnsplashICO limited to qualified issuersAccording to a report by Newsis, the government is preparing to allow token issuance but will restrict eligibility to corporations that meet specific thresholds. Issuers would be required to submit documentation, including white papers, to financial authorities in advance and ensure these materials are available to investors. These requirements are expected to be codified in the Digital Asset Basic Act, a second-phase crypto bill currently under preparation. The report noted that the legislation aims to protect users and mitigate market risks by clearly defining accountability for potential failures. An official from the financial regulator stated that detailed criteria, such as minimum capital requirements, would be outlined in enforcement decrees after the bill is passed. Under the proposed rules, companies would be required to file a disclosure document with financial regulators. The requirement would mirror securities filings, but with a focus on public disclosure rather than regulatory approval. The Financial Services Commission would receive the filings, while the Financial Supervisory Service would examine them. Officials are also discussing measures to hold issuing companies fully liable should problems arise after issuance, reflecting the practical challenges involved in verifying the technical aspects of token projects in advance. The regulatory shift would allow South Korean companies to issue tokens at home instead of routing offerings through jurisdictions such as Singapore or Hong Kong. Until now, Korea-based issuers have typically set up overseas entities to conduct ICOs before seeking listings on domestic exchanges. The change is expected to encourage projects that previously went offshore to return to Korea. An industry official said the return of domestic token issuance would help tech companies raise early-stage funding at home and support the launch of new businesses. The move would also intensify competition among exchanges to attract promising projects, the official said, potentially broadening product offerings and lifting trading volumes. Japan plans ETFs, industry seeks faster rolloutAs South Korea moves to allow token issuance, Japan is also easing digital asset rules, though the industry has flagged the slow pace of change. According to local media reports, Japan’s Financial Services Agency plans to revise rules governing investment trusts to allow the inclusion of digital assets. This change would pave the way for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking spot crypto prices as early as 2028. Asset managers are already preparing for the shift. A Nikkei survey showed that as of last November, major firms, including Nomura Asset Management, SBI Global Asset Management, Daiwa, Asset Management One, Amova, and Mitsubishi UFJ, were considering the development of crypto-related investment trusts. However, the timeline has faced pushback. Tomoya Asakura, chief executive of SBI Global Asset Management, said on X that allowing crypto ETFs only from 2028 would be too slow for a country aiming to position itself as a global asset-management hub. He called for a faster rollout, arguing that such products could help channel household savings into investment.