Turkish lira becomes third largest fiat currency in crypto trading

Hong Kong–listed companies are stepping up digital-asset bets as the city sets out a clearer rulebook, a sign that tighter oversight and new market rails are starting to unlock institutional demand.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashCorporate moves signal rising appetiteBoyaa Interactive International has been adding Bitcoin (BTC) to its treasury, with the latest acquisition of 411 BTC bringing its total holdings to 4,091 BTC. The gaming company has said it will direct 90% of a planned $56.3 million rights issue into Bitcoin. Yunfeng Financial raised HKD 1.17 billion, or about $150 million, through a new share issuance and plans to use part of the proceeds to launch cryptocurrency trading and investment management services. The firm is associated with Yunfeng Capital, which was co-founded by Alibaba founder Jack Ma, and has previously outlined plans to accumulate BTC, Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL). These moves land alongside a policy reset from the top. In his annual address on Sept. 17, Chief Executive John Lee reaffirmed Hong Kong’s goal of cementing its position as an international hub in finance, including digital assets, while pairing that ambition with stronger investor safeguards. Tokenization and blockchain testbedThe centerpiece is Project Ensemble, run by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). The initiative is building infrastructure for a tokenized market and operates a sandbox where institutions can test blockchain systems in live business settings. Priorities include tokenized bank deposits, settlement of tokenized assets such as money market funds, and standardized issuance of government tokenized bonds. Regulation is advancing in parallel. The government is preparing legislation for a licensing regime that covers stablecoin issuers as well as digital-asset dealing and custody providers. The Securities and Futures Commission is studying an expansion of products for professional investors, with tougher protections baked in. The regulator plans to use automated reporting and data surveillance to curb misconduct. Authorities also intend to deepen cross-border cooperation to combat tax evasion. Banking rules are set to shift as well. The HKMA has circulated draft guidance that would ease capital requirements for certain crypto exposures in line with Basel standards through a new policy module called CRP-1. Under the proposal, assets issued on permissionless blockchains could qualify for lower capital charges when issuers demonstrate effective risk management. Hong Kong aims to implement the international rules by early 2026.Publicly traded BTC treasury firms in China Source: BitcoinTreasuries.NETAdoption amid constraintsNot every institution will join the build-out. Mainland policies may constrain participation, according to Caixin. Chinese digital platforms, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and financial entities operating in Hong Kong could face limits on stablecoin and other crypto activity. Branches of several SOEs and Chinese banks are also unlikely to seek a Hong Kong stablecoin license. Corporate adoption remains broad despite those headwinds. Publicly traded Bitcoin treasury companies in China and Hong Kong hold a combined 19,280 BTC, according to BitcoinTreasuries.net. Several appear among the top 50 public corporate holders worldwide, including Next Technology Holding (16th), Cango (18th), Boyaa (24th), Nano Labs (48th), and Ming Shing Group (50th). The tally points to rising regional interest in digital assets. Publicly traded BTC treasury firms in Hong Kong Source: BitcoinTreasuries.NET

Abu Dhabi’s Venom Ventures Fund faces market challengesA report by The Block on Friday suggests that Abu Dhabi’s ambitious Venom Ventures Fund, heralded earlier this year with promises of $1 billion investment in Web3 startups, is facing challenges in following through on its mission.Photo by Nazar Skalatsky on UnsplashWhat is Venom?Venom is a collaboration between the Venom Foundation and Iceberg Capital, an alternative asset management company also based in Abu Dhabi. The venture was conceived by Peter Knez, former Co-Chief Investment Officer of BlackRock’s fixed income division and Mustafa Kheriba, Iceberg’s Executive Chairman.In a tweet thread published back in August, the firm described the fund as “old money meets new, the perfect platform for leading the next iteration of blockchain development.” The fund outlined that its approach incorporated venture capital, the offering of a project incubator and a specialist advisory service.Knez has set out lofty ambitions for the fund, stating:“The vision is to drive billions of users into our layer one Blockchain technology by being institutional quality and regulated, and by being such we can actually partner with the government and institutions to help them develop framework for stable coins, for cross-border payment system for tokenization of real world assets and thereby help web2 businesses and citizens move to web3.”At the time of its announcement, Venom Ventures boasted a $20 million investment in Nümi Metaverse and a $5 million strategic investment in Layer 1 blockchain Everscale.Unexpected silenceFurther details on deals struck since January have been scarce, although the fund was reported back in August to have been involved in a blockchain-based carbon credits project, backed by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Climate Change and Environment (MOCCAE).According to The Block, there has been an unexpected silence from the venture as its first year in business comes to a close, despite the initial buzz in the crypto community that greeted the launch of the fund.Venom Ventures positioned itself to cover the entire venture spectrum, from seed to late-stage investments, even offering grants ranging from $25,000 to $200,000. However, a closer look reveals a stark contrast between the fund’s ambitious promises and its current progress. The fund’s website lacks a portfolio section, displaying only a “coming soon” notice.Blockchain mainnet yet to launchThe venture fund has yet to launch its Venom blockchain mainnet, according to Christopher Louis Tsu, CEO of the Venom Foundation. The lack of updates and communication has raised concerns among industry observers about the fund’s overall progress and its ability to fulfill its investment commitments.The broader context of the crypto market adds to the challenges faced by Venom Ventures. Q4 2023 is expected to see a significant drop in venture funding for Web3, down to approximately $2.7 billion from the peak of $13.5 billion in Q1 2022. Market events have left VCs cautious, with notable instances of significant investments being marked down to zero.Amidst these challenges, crypto startups have turned to the Middle East for capital. However, some industry insiders caution that the perceived ease of accessing capital in the Middle East might be a mirage. With that, it remains to be seen whether the fund can revive its initial momentum and deliver on its promise to fuel the growth of Web3 startups in the ever-evolving crypto landscape.

Top Korean Crypto Exchanges Witness Surge in Listings and Delistings During H1In the first half of this year, South Korea’s top five cryptocurrency exchanges experienced notable growth in the number of newly added cryptocurrencies to their platforms. However, they also observed a significant surge in the number of cryptocurrencies being delisted.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDelisting and listingAccording to a report by local news outlet Etoday, the nation’s five leading exchanges Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax ceased trading for a total of 51 cryptocurrencies during the first six months of this year. This marked an 88% increase compared to the 27 cryptocurrencies delisted in the previous six-month period. During the first half of last year, the number of delisted tokens was 48.Among the five exchanges, Coinone took the lead by delisting the highest number of cryptocurrencies, totaling 24. Bithumb followed with 14 delisted tokens, Gopax with six, Upbit with five, and Korbit with two. Notably, Coinone continued its delisting spree this month, removing an additional five cryptocurrencies from its platform. Most cryptos were delisted because their projects and services were not operating normally.The significant number of delisted tokens at Coinone appears to be linked to the involvement of its former employees in the unlawful listing of certain tokens. These individuals reportedly received bribes in exchange for listing a total of 46 cryptocurrencies on the trading platform. Among these tokens were PICA and PURE, which are no longer traded on the exchange.Only five cryptocurrencies were delisted according to the decision made by the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), a self-regulatory group consisting of the aforementioned five crypto exchanges. The delisted tokens were REP, BASIC, OMG, SRM, and PCI. This indicates that most of the affected cryptocurrencies were exclusively traded on one of the DAXA member exchanges, indicating that DAXA’s listing and delisting guidelines were largely ineffective.Meanwhile, there has been a notable surge in the number of newly added cryptocurrencies. Bithumb, for instance, took the lead by listing an impressive 63 new tokens, nearly three times the number listed by Upbit (22). In the same vein, Coinone added 14 tokens, while Korbit and Gopax followed with six and three new listings, respectively.Profit squeezeLast year, crypto trading platforms adopted a conservative approach when it came to listing and delisting procedures, prioritizing investor protection. However, their stance shifted as the global crypto market encountered a significant decline in trading volume amid crypto winter. This decrease in trading activity subsequently led to reduced operating profits, compelling the platforms to list more cryptocurrencies.With the exception of Upbit, which maintains a dominant market share in the nation, the outlook on crypto exchanges appears more or less grim. In particular, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax are in the red. Bithumb, while still in profit, saw its operating profit last year falling 80% year-over-year to 163.5 billion KRW ($127.9 million). This trend continued this year, with Bithumb’s operating profit In the first quarter of this year recording 16.2 billion KRW, an 80% decrease compared to the same period last year.In light of this development, an industry insider, who wished to stay anonymous, told Etoday that while the market’s total trading volume is witnessing a considerable decline, Upbit’s dominance is still growing. This individual also noted that the decrease in trading volume and the resulting deficit are exerting pressure on exchanges to expand their cryptocurrency listings.