Malaysian exchange Hata raises $4.2M

Japanese Expansion Sees XDC Network Pair Up with SBI SubsidiaryThe XDC Network, a leading carbon-neutral, enterprise-grade hybrid blockchain solution formerly known as XinFin, is gearing up to make inroads into the Japanese market through a partnership with SBI VC Trade, a cryptocurrency exchange subsidiary of Tokyo-based financial holding company SBI.On May 31, the Singapore-based team behind XDC Network announced its addition to SBI’s crypto exchange subsidiary, marking an important milestone in their expansion efforts. Fumiki Ozaki, CEO of SBI VC Trade, expressed his excitement about the partnership, stating, “We are delighted to expand our cryptocurrency offerings by adding XDC to our exchange. XDC Network brings a unique value proposition to the trade finance market, and we believe its addition will enhance our customers’ trading experience.”Photo by Denys Nevozhai on UnsplashToken gainsThe XDC token has been gaining significant traction recently, becoming one of the top 5 altcoin gainers in March 2023 with a 54% rise in just 30 days. The network supports Ethereum Virtual Machine-compatible smart contracts, protocols, and atomic cross-chain token transfers. It also complies with the ISO-20022 message standard, which is widely accepted for electronic data interchange between financial institutions.This particular announcement on Wednesday has resulted in XDC token appreciation of 10% over the past 24 hours alone. At the time of publication, the project’s native token stood at a unit price of $0.03456.Ecosystem development decentralizationIn a move towards decentralization, the XDC Network recently established a decentralized autonomous organization to govern the blockchain. With its deployment in May, the community will have a say in the distribution of ecosystem funds to foster further development.While the project team behind the blockchain network believes the network itself to be decentralized, many projects in crypto have grappled with the difficult issue of governance. XDC Network’s DaoFin project exemplifies its efforts to achieve a more equitable and decentralized form of network governance.SBI delving deeper into cryptoAtul Khekade, Co-founder of XDC Network, expressed enthusiasm about expanding into Japan, stating: “Japan serves as a crucial hub for international trade, and our blockchain platform aims to streamline this sector by improving transparency, traceability, and reducing costs.”SBI is also making strides to strengthen its presence in key cryptocurrency markets. In September 2022, it obtained a license to operate in Singapore, expanding its reach beyond Japan. Additionally, one of SBI’s portfolio companies, digital asset trading technology firm Clear Markets, received approval from the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to offer over-the-counter crypto derivatives products with physical settlement.In 2018, SBI partnered with crypto lender Amber in forming a joint venture company in order to take on the Japanese market. It pursued a similar strategy with crypto custody service provider Zodia Custody, forming a joint venture subsidiary to assist it in gaining exposure to the Japanese market.The partnership between XDC Network and SBI VC Trade signifies the growing interest in blockchain technology and cryptocurrency in Japan. By joining forces, XDC Network and SBI VC Trade aim to revolutionize the trade finance market by leveraging the transparency and efficiency of blockchain, ultimately benefiting businesses and consumers alike.With the shared vision of advancing the adoption of blockchain technology, both parties are poised to make a significant impact on the future of trade finance and digital asset trading.

Crypto licensing developments in Singapore over the course of 2024, allied with feedback from industry insiders, suggest that the city-state has furthered its development as a crypto industry hub in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region.Photo by Mike Enerio on UnsplashDoubling up on licensing issuanceAccording to a report published by Lianhe Zaobao, a Chinese language newspaper in Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), had issued twice the number of Major Payment Institution (MPI) licenses in 2024 by comparison with the previous year. Four licenses were issued in 2023 to Crypto.com, Coinbase, Ripple and Blockchain.com. That compares with 13 licenses issued in 2024 to companies such as GSR, BitGo, Anchorage, Upbit and OKX. This uptick in licensing signals a regulatory regime that is innovation-friendly, resulting in Singapore becoming a key destination for startup companies in the crypto and Web3 space. Risk-adjusted regulatory approachAccording to William Croisettier, chief growth officer at ZKCandy, Singapore is primed to continue its development as a leading crypto hub for Web3 businesses within the APAC region. ZKCandy is a gaming-focused hyperchain within the zkSync ecosystem that has developed due to a collaboration between the Ethereum layer-2 zkSync network and Southeast Asia’s largest gaming developer, iCandy. Croisettier spoke to Cointelegraph on the matter recently, stating: “The country adopts a risk-adjusted approach to crypto regulation, focusing on the biggest digital currencies to protect investors. Singapore also makes it easy for new crypto firms to interact with local banking partners, a provision considered a luxury in other parts of the world.” Mouloukou Sanoh, co-founder and CEO of Dubai-based Mansa Finance, a DeFi platform that provides liquidity to cross-border payment companies, has also spoken positively about Singapore’s status within the crypto sector. Sanoh stated: “With its clear regulations and support for innovation, Singapore attracts top companies and talent, fostering a thriving ecosystem. This proactive approach signals a strong commitment to digital finance, contrasting with Hong Kong's more cautious stance.” Positive study findingsThese views correlate with a recent study carried out by ApeX Protocol, a multi-chain liquidity platform. The study applied a ranking to ten jurisdictions based on factors such as jobs created in the blockchain field, the number of crypto exchanges located within a jurisdiction and the number of blockchain-related patents filed. On that basis, it found that Singapore topped the rankings, ahead of Hong Kong in second place. Singapore was found to have 81 crypto exchanges located within the city-state, over 1,600 blockchain-related patents filed and 2,433 crypto-sector jobs created. A recent survey conducted by CoinDesk found that from a crypto adoption perspective, Thailand, followed by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and India, lead the APAC region. Of the 10 countries surveyed, Singapore weighed in in seventh place with a 23% adoption rate, just one percentage point behind Hong Kong with 24%. As Hong Kong and Singapore compete to attract crypto-related business, both still have room for improvement when it comes to the crypto adoption metric in comparison with other Asian countries. 

Singapore Judge Says Crypto Not MoneyIn recent years, legal processes in various jurisdictions worldwide have seen judges comment on whether cryptocurrency is actually money. The latest such determination has been made by Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy who outlined in a Singapore court that while being a component of financial transactions, cryptocurrencies are not money.The consideration emerged in a recent court hearing at Singapore’s High Court in a case involving the Algorand Foundation and failed Singapore-based hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Justice Coomaraswamy’s comments arose due to a discussion in the midst of the court proceedings involving the Judge and counsel representing the Algorand Foundation.©Pexels/EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVASeashells as moneyIn setting out his rationale for the need for 3AC to be wound up, Daniel Chan, a lawyer for the WongPartnership law firm that was representing the Algorand Foundation in the proceedings, told the judge that despite foreign currencies not being recognized as legal tender in Singapore, or used broadly as a medium of exchange within the city state, those foreign currencies are recognized by Singapore law as money. Using that analogy Chan suggested that by implication, the same scenario should be considered where cryptocurrencies are concerned.The judge provided a counterpoint: “What if you had a [community] in the world that used seashells as its internal medium of exchange? Would the Singapore courts have to recognize that as money.” Chan claimed that the judge had used an extreme example although Coomaraswamy remained steadfast in his view, pointing out that seashells had indeed been used as a form of money in the distant past.Coomaraswamy proceeded to dismiss the Algorand Foundation’s winding up application. He acknowledged that the Foundation did have standing in bringing the application. However, as he determined that cryptocurrency couldn’t be classed as money, on that basis he dismissed the application. In conveying his decision, he stated: “The word indebtedness, in my view, must require a debt which is in fiat currency. Determining whether or not a particular intangible, such as cryptocurrency, is money would require a detailed examination of evidence which is not appropriate in the context of insolvency.”Legal tenderThus far, bitcoin has been recognized as legal tender in two countries — El Salvador and the Central African Republic. In 2020, a French court referred to the leading cryptocurrency as money, agreeing that Bitcoin loans can be recognized as customer loans in the same way as loans denominated in fiat currencies. Earlier that year, an Australian court recognized bitcoin as a legally legitimate form of investment. In the United States, a Federal court recognized bitcoin as “money” or “funds” in a prosecution taken against Silk Road website operator Ross Ulbricht.There have been many similar instances in courts globally where judges have had to grapple with the consideration of whether bitcoin and crypto more generally can be regarded as money. Similar to the difficulty authorities are having in regulating cryptocurrency, it’s an issue that in most cases lacks complete clarity and in which we can expect further discussions on, similar to this most recent consideration in the Singaporean high court.