Regulatory approach sees Singapore move closer to crypto hub status

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

Wemade Expands Web3 Ecosystem Through New CollaborationsSouth Korean blockchain gaming publisher Wemade has been making strides to expand its ecosystem. Most recently, the company announced that it made a series of new investments and signed a business deal with a social finance organization.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashInvesting in the future of blockchain gamesWEMIX PTE., a Singapore-based Wemade subsidiary, said Wednesday that it has invested in five Chinese game developers through a $30 million fund aimed at fostering promising blockchain gaming companies. Mirana Ventures, the Web3-focused investment unit of the crypto exchange Bybit, is also participating in the fund as an investor. The latest investment was worth $6.4 million.Each investee is working on a new game, ranging from massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG) to card strategy and sports games. All of these games will be onboarded to WEMIX PLAY, WEMIX’s blockchain gaming platform.WEMIX reaffirmed its dedication to working with Chinese projects and providing the new investees with its knowledge about blockchain technology and the burgeoning Web3 market.Giving back to the communityMeanwhile, the South Korean blockchain gaming publisher Wemade also signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Social Solidarity Bank, a Korean social finance organization, to build a blockchain-based sponsorship ecosystem. Social Solidarity Bank offers microfinance and alternative finance services mainly in the form of loans and funds to economically vulnerable groups with the help of sponsors. It will be onboarding Wepublic, a transparent social platform based on WEMIX that allows users to create and operate their own decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Under the agreement, Wepublic’s proof of balance protocol will be integrated into Social Solidarity Bank’s social finance system to mint mirror tokens that are linked one-to-one with individual accounts. The mirror tokens will serve to help donors understand how their contributions are translated into social outcomes. Sponsors can check the status and usage of donations at any time through records of token deposits and withdrawals.This service is set to launch next year and will be grow into a Web3 sponsorship business where sponsors will also be given the right to participate in governance voting.

Sumitomo Trade Document Network Partnership Adds Chainlink InvolvementA successful proof-of-concept (PoC) venture between Vodafone and Japanese trading and investment giant Sumitomo has resulted in Vodafone’s Digital Asset Broker (DAB) platform now being integrated into the Chainlink network as a node operator.Vodafone provided details on the Chainlink Labs tie-up via a blog post published to its website on Tuesday. The primary objective of this partnership is to enhance the seamless transfer and processing of financial documents within the $32 trillion global trade ecosystem.Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on UnsplashLeveraging Chainlink’s cross-chain interoperabilityThe proof of concept leveraged Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), offering a solution that bridges the gaps in document management and financial transaction processing. DAB’s core function is to provide enhanced security and interoperability among Internet of Things (IoT) devices on the edge of a network.The results of this initiative have demonstrated the potential for Vodafone’s IoT devices and blockchain technology to furnish data for use in contracts and artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Furthermore, the prospect of creating a unified interface for data and token transfers is now within reach.For instance, envision a scenario where a cargo vessel detects a fire outbreak. Thanks to the collaborative efforts of DAB’s platform and CCIP, this crucial information could be autonomously relayed to smart contracts, potentially triggering an efficient marine cargo insurance process.Convoluted legacy processTrade documents have long posed a significant challenge due to their existence in both physical and digital formats, often lacking interoperability. This predicament necessitates repeated handovers and makes the exchange of such documents a convoluted process.Vodafone introduced the Digital Asset Broker in February 2022. Their initial application of DAB in the United Kingdom involved a partnership with Mastercard, where they trialed an app designed to assist electric vehicle drivers in locating and paying for the most suitable charging options.In a subsequent move, Vodafone and Sumitomo joined forces in May, culminating in the creation of a new entity in which Vodafone maintained an 80% stake. In addition to transferring DAB, Vodafone also contributed intellectual property, contracts, technology, and software to the new venture. This partnership extended further with joint investments in Safaricom Ethiopia.In August, Vodafone DAB solidified its presence in the enterprise blockchain arena by collaborating with Aventus. Their shared mission is to enhance the efficiency of supply chains within the aviation industry.Chainlink’s CCIP made a significant leap in September when it launched on Ethereum’s Arbitrum One layer 2, promising to enhance scalability. In the same month, it collaborated with the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group to test an Australian dollar stablecoin, underscoring Chainlink’s commitment to transformative developments within the blockchain space.Early blockchain interestSumitomo had expressed a desire to utilize blockchain technology going back a number of years. In 2018, the corporation’s US entity joined the Blockchain in Transport Alliance (BiTA) with a view towards using blockchain technology within its logistics business.Earlier this year, the conglomerate invested in Japanese logistics blockchain project TradeWaltz. In June, its US subsidiary was involved in the first-ever transaction of tokenized carbon credits.As Vodafone and Sumitomo continue to push the boundaries of innovation in trade document management, their partnership with Chainlink brings us one step closer to a more efficient and interconnected global trade ecosystem.