Blockstream partnership & new office announced in Japanese expansion

Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, the conversion of tangible assets into digital tokens on a blockchain, is gaining momentum in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), according to a number of industry professionals working in the sector.Photo by ZQ Lee on Unsplash‘No lack of demand’Scott Thiel, founder and CEO of Dubai-based RWA token marketplace Tokinvest, recently outlined to Cointelegraph that the company is experiencing “no lack of demand” for tokenized RWAs. Thiel believes that demand is coming from real estate developers and large property owners who “want to explore how they can use this as an alternate means of financing or selling their property.” The Tokinvest CEO explained that a booming property market in the UAE,  particularly in Dubai, is contributing towards RWA tokenization demand in the country. He stated: “What’s the hottest real estate market in the world? Well, I think today it’s probably Dubai, and so, everyone would like to own a piece of this or to get access to the economic benefits of being a participant in that marketplace.” RWA tokenization dealsLast year, Liv Digital Bank, a subsidiary of Emirates NBD, the second largest bank in the UAE, signed a deal with RWA tokenization firm Ctrl Alt. At the time, Ctrl Alt CEO Matt Ong pointed to a Boston Consulting Group report that forecast a $16 trillion business opportunity with regard to the tokenization of global illiquid assets by 2030. In January, MANTRA, a layer-1 blockchain project that focuses on RWA tokenization, inked a $1 billion deal with Damac Group, an Emirati property development company. The objective of the partnership is to bring transparency, security and access to Damac’s assets using blockchain. Last month, MANTRA was awarded a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license by Dubai regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). MANTRA Co-founder and CEO John Patrick Mullin described the license award as “a validation of our purpose, which is to provide developers and institutions with a purpose-built RWA Layer 1 Blockchain, that’s capable of adhering to real world regulatory requirements.” Proactive regulationIt is with regard to regulation that many in the industry feel that the UAE is gaining the upper hand where RWA tokenization is concerned. Tokeninvest’s Thiel provided input into the formulation of VARA’s regulatory framework back in 2022. He said that the authorities there have taken a proactive approach to digital asset regulation, with a genuine desire to provide regulatory clarity. The Tokinvest CEO was sufficiently impressed by the regulatory approach in the UAE to relocate the company there. Back in January, VARA awarded the company a trading license for its tokenized RWA marketplace. Commenting following the announcement of the Damac deal, MANTRA’s Mullin complimented the UAE authorities on their business-friendly approach: “The UAE has shown time and again that they can lead the crypto industry in innovation.”  In a series of posts on X recently, Julian Kwan, CEO and founder of IXS, a Singapore-based institutional bridge for tokenized RWAs, cited the Damac tokenized real estate deal while asserting that tokenized “RWAs are no longer a concept — they are an unstoppable financial movement.”

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.

Korean Crypto Exchange Alliance Launches Its Official WebsiteThe Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), which comprises South Korea’s five major cryptocurrency exchanges Gopax, Bithumb, Upbit, Korbit, and Coinone, announced the launch of its official website on Tuesday.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsWebsite structure and featuresThe website has three primary sections: Introduction, News, and Archives. The Introduction section provides comprehensive information about the exchange, including a greeting from Chairman Lee Sirgoo, who also serves as the CEO of Upbit’s operator Dunamu. It also presents an organizational structure, details of the corporate identity, and links to each individual exchange.The News section provides users with announcements, press releases, and event information. Meanwhile, the Archives section houses educational videos, institutional reports, and a list of important statutes and regulations.Mitigating information disparityDAXA Vice Chairman Kim Jae-jin said the website would offer easy access to information concerning digital assets and the alliance’s self-regulatory measures. She mentioned the group’s commitment to investor protection, focusing on addressing information asymmetry.In addition to the website, DAXA runs a Youtube channel, with its first video uploaded in January of this year.Controversy surrounding the allianceEarlier this year, DAXA faced backlash after it implemented a new clause in its guidelines, which disallowed the re-listing of cryptocurrencies that had been removed from its member exchanges for a period of one year. Critics claimed that DAXA’s guideline was unclear and voiced concerns about the Alliance’s growing influence in the crypto sector. These worries are amplified by the fact that the member exchanges of DAXA command 98% of the crypto trading volume in Korea.