Metaplanet targeting 21K Bitcoin by 2026

DDC Enterprise, a Chinese company headquartered in Hong Kong and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), has become the latest corporation to add Bitcoin (BTC) to its balance sheet.Photo by Michael Förtsch on UnsplashInitial 21 BTC purchaseThe plant-based food products company which operates under the “DayDayCook” brand published a press release via Business Wire last Friday announcing its first Bitcoin purchase. It’s likely that there was a symbolic element to the firm’s first Bitcoin purchase, given that it bought 21 BTC while Bitcoin has a supply cap of 21 million BTC. The company completed the transaction via share exchange with an investor group, issuing 254,333 class A ordinary shares while acquiring the 21 BTC at a market price of $2,283,667. DDC outlined that it plans to make two further purchases over the coming days of 79 BTC, at which point the firm’s corporate treasury will hold 100 BTC. Targeting 5,000 BTCThe company has a much more ambitious Bitcoin accumulation plan, however. Over the course of the next three years, it is targeting the establishment of a Bitcoin treasury holding 5,000 BTC. At current market pricing, that would amount to a Bitcoin treasury of around half a billion dollars in value. In the near term, the firm is targeting the acquisition of 500 BTC by the end of this year. DDC Founder and CEO Norma Chu described the development as a “pivotal moment” in the company’s evolution. She said that this plan reflects DDC’s “confidence in Bitcoin as a store of value,” while demonstrating the firm’s interest in pursuing innovation. “We are fully committed to ensuring the success of this strategy, which aligns with our vision to drive long-term value for our shareholders,” she added. Web3 innovationAccording to a DDC website, the company has innovative plans that go beyond just a Bitcoin treasury. It plans to deepen community engagement through the use of NFT loyalty programs and immersive Web3 experiences. It also plans to leverage blockchain transparency in its efforts to build greater community engagement. The website sets out a vision whereby DDC can blend its culinary heritage with next-generation technologies.  The company suggests that real-world asset (RWA) tokenization has the potential to revolutionize consumer engagement, while offering the possibility of enabling fractional ownership of product lines. It has set out a roadmap where it outlines having established a digital platform in 2012, going on to engage in content creation and content commerce over the course of a decade.  The firm carried out an initial public offering (IPO) in 2023 and from 2025 onwards, aside from its Bitcoin treasury strategy, it plans to integrate RWA tokenization and Web3 technology into its business, while also adopting AI technologies to enhance supply chain efficiency. DDC is one of a growing list of corporations to adopt Bitcoin as a strategic asset over the course of the past 18 months. Earlier this month, another Chinese company, Nasdaq-listed Jiuzi Holdings, an electric vehicle (EV) retailer, announced that it had adopted a plan to acquire 1,000 BTC. Hong Kong-listed game developer Boyaa Interactive holds 3,350 BTC.

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNXMark Lamb, the co-founder of failed crypto derivatives and yield platform CoinFLEX, has asserted that creditors of the company cannot interfere with OPNX, a Seychelles-incorporated company that Lamb has co-founded with Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the founders of failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashFallout following writIt emerged in October that a group of CoinFLEX creditors had filed a writ of summons in the High Court of Hong Kong, claiming that OPNX, a new crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform linked to CoinFLEX, was established using CoinFLEX assets without their consent. While incorporated in the Seychelles, CoinFLEX ran its operations from Hong Kong.The writ alleges that Mark Lamb misappropriated assets, diverted clients and business opportunities and engaged in actions harmful to creditors during his tenure.The creditors argue that Lamb, while serving as CoinFLEX’s CEO, simultaneously devoted time and effort to setting up OPNX, contrary to his responsibilities. The allegations include diverting assets, falsely representing OPNX’s association with CoinFLEX creditors, disclosing confidential trade secrets and soliciting employees to move to OPNX.The legal action — filed by two companies, Liquidity Technologies and Liquidity Technologies Software — claims that OPNX’s formation was unauthorized and harmful to CoinFLEX creditors. Despite CoinFLEX’s terms of service requiring dispute resolution through arbitration in Hong Kong, the allegations have not been proven in the High Court of Hong Kong.Lamb addresses ‘Twitter FUD’In response to these creditor actions, earlier this week, Lamb took to X (formerly Twitter) to address what he termed as “Twitter FUD.” Lamb wrote:“The Hong Kong court ruled that the few CoinFLEX creditors behind recent ‘FUD’ must not disrupt or interfere with OPNX in any way — and their legal counsel has subsequently stopped representing them.”Lamb added that he hoped that CoinFLEX’s 4,800 creditors would choose the path that he has proposed on the basis that it “maximizes value.”OPNX has defended its position, emphasizing that it provided an opportunity for creditors to sell their claims on the exchange for quick cash, benefiting them. Davies and Zhu have pledged to donate their share of the profit to 3AC creditors.In February, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, announced the rebranding of CoinFLEX to Open Exchange (OPNX). However, the writ of summons claims that OPNX is a separate entity not authorized by CoinFLEX creditors. Leslie Lamb followed up in April by claiming backing from well-known entities in crypto venture capital, only for many of those mentioned to immediately refute such claims.The dispute has also implicated Roger Ver, a well-known character in the crypto space otherwise referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver, a significant individual customer, was accused of defaulting by CoinFLEX. Ver denied defaulting and claimed that CoinFLEX used his trading positions against him, leading to a court-ordered arbitration.OPNX, since its launch in April, has obtained a Lithuanian license for spot trading in the EU and currently processes substantial daily trading volumes. Criminal and civil proceedings against OPNX co-founders Davies and Zhu are ongoing. The situation remains fluid as the legal dispute unfolds.

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian BanksGlobal crypto exchange Binance has removed the option for users to conduct transactions via sanctioned Russian banks on its peer-to-peer (P2P) platform, a decision that comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé published earlier this week, shedding light on the platform’s involvement in facilitating the movement of funds for Russian users.Previously, Binance’s peer-to-peer service featured five Russian banks under sanctions as a method for ruble transfers between users. However, the company swiftly acted to address potential compliance concerns. Fittingly, this latest news was also broken by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.Dmitry Sidorov on PexelsSailing too close to the windWhen approached regarding the omission of these banks, a Binance spokesperson stated: “We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards. When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”The Wall Street Journal’s article outlined how Binance’s peer-to-peer platform facilitated ruble-to-crypto trades that frequently involved the sanctioned Russian banks, with Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank being prominent examples.These trades often utilized layers of intermediaries to convert funds from these banks into Binance balances, as detailed by various company resources, user screenshots, and messages in official chat groups. Despite these revelations, Binance’s exchange had continued to handle significant volumes of ruble trading, according to data compiled by digital asset research firm CCData.US DoJ probeBinance’s activities in Russia could potentially contribute to its ongoing legal challenges in the United States. The US Justice Department (DoJ) has been probing the company’s actions for potential violations of American sanctions on Russia. In response to such concerns, the Binance spokesperson emphasized:“Binance aims to diligently comply with the global sanctions rules and enforces sanctions on people, organizations, entities, and countries that have been blacklisted by the international community, denying such actors access to the Binance platform.”WorkaroundsTraders, however, had reportedly found workarounds to the bank removals, as observed in the official Telegram chat group for Russian clients. Many shared that they could still engage with sanctioned banks by selecting alternative payment methods and then manually inputting their Rosbank or Tinkoff bank details.Earlier this year, an investigative report by CNBC alleged that employees of the company had told it that Binance staff regularly helped Chinese customers to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) controls in order to access the platform. More recently, another report, once again by the Wall Street Journal, found that business in China was booming, which surprised many given that China banned crypto trading within the country in 2021.It’s apparent that the company is reacting to regulatory and legal pressures in taking the decision to make these changes to its P2P service. Perennial crypto critic US Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, stating:“I rang the alarm about sanctions evasion by Russia using the crypto platform Binance — and urged [the DoJ] to investigate potentially false statements it made to Congress. We need stronger crypto regulations to rein in illicit finance.“