Korea’s Bithumb joins forces with Interpol to fight crypto crime

The Abu Dhabi Agriculture and Food Safety Authority has announced a ban on cryptocurrency mining on farms, addressing concerns over the misuse of agricultural land.Photo by Kamil Rogalinski on UnsplashClaims of farm misuseAccording to the Khaleej Times, the Authority has informed UAE farmers that their lands are not to be used for Bitcoin and crypto mining. This activity is deemed a “misuse of the farm for purposes other than its intended use.” The new regulation aims to preserve the primary agricultural function of these lands and imposes penalties of up to 10,000 United Arab Emirates Dirhams (approximately $2,722) for violations. Cryptocurrency mining requires significant computational power and electricity, which conflicts with the farms’ intended agricultural use.  Broader support for miningDespite this specific restriction, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) maintains a supportive stance towards cryptocurrency and cryptocurrency mining beyond a farm setting. In 2023, the country emerged as a notable player in the global Bitcoin mining industry, with a combined mining capacity of around 400 megawatts, contributing approximately 4% of the global Bitcoin hash rate. It’s proven to be a popular place in which to locate a mining facility as the country has a robust infrastructure. Stable power is essential in order for miners to be able to run their machines in a sustainable manner. Additionally, the government has generally been supportive of the activity, fostering a conducive environment for both crypto and Bitcoin mining and blockchain technology more generally. Furthermore, the country occupies a strategic location at the crossroads of major trade routes. Regulatory clarity has also been provided by the authorities in the UAE with regard to how crypto mining activity is to be carried out. While this latest move against mining within a farm setting is a restriction, it still feeds into that overall framework of regulatory clarity and certainty. Attracting mining firmsGiven the aforementioned reasons in support of mining in the UAE, the Middle Eastern country continues to attract cryptocurrency mining firms.  In December of last year, a Dubai-headquartered Bitcoin mining company, Phoenix Group, struck a $380 million deal with Chinese mining equipment manufacturer MicroBT. That same month, the company was listed on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX). In May 2023, Abu Dhabi-based digital assets development company Zero Two entered into a partnership with North American crypto miner Marathon Digital with a view towards developing the region’s first large-scale crypto mining facility. Beyond mining, the location is also proving popular for crypto firms more generally. In May 2023, Chainalysis, a leading blockchain analytics company, established its regional headquarters in Dubai. Similarly, Blockdaemon, a provider of institutional infrastructure, expanded its operations in Abu Dhabi, facilitated by the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), a key financial regulator. Speaking at the Dubai FinTech Summit recently, Reece Merrick, Managing Director of enterprise blockchain company Ripple for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, said that “the UAE has done a remarkable job in really putting itself in a position to be the global crypto hub.”

A Chinese creditor of failed crypto exchange FTX has filed an objection on his own behalf and that of 300 others, with a U.S. bankruptcy court against a motion lodged with a view towards excluding payouts to creditors resident in China, Russia and 47 other foreign jurisdictions.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashPotential distribution forfeitureThe FTX Recovery Trust, an entity formed in January to oversee the FTX bankruptcy estate following the adoption of a plan of reorganization, filed a motion last week seeking the approval of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in the United States to adhere to new parameters related to the claims of creditors residing in restricted overseas jurisdictions. Besides China and Russia, the list of restricted jurisdictions also includes many within the Asian region, including  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Macau, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Qatar, Bangladesh and Cambodia. The FTX estate claims that these jurisdictions have regulations and laws restricting cryptocurrency transactions. In such cases, the FTX Recovery Trust claims that it cannot break local laws.  The difficulty for creditors resident in these countries is that if it's deemed illegal to reimburse them, they won’t qualify for the next scheduled distribution from the estate. In that instance, distribution forfeiture will be triggered. Taking to X on July 7, FTXcreditor.com, an entity that has been buying up bankruptcy claims from FTX creditors over the course of the FTX bankruptcy process, highlighted the peril that creditors residing in these restricted countries may face. It stated: “Distribution forfeiture is triggered at every distribution record date. The first record date already passed, if your claim is still tied to a local KYC when the stamp drops, that tranche is potentially gone.” Short timeframe for objectionsMr. Purple, a pseudonymous distressed assets bankruptcy professional who has been advocating for FTX creditors since the collapse of the business in November 2022, concurred with this view in a subsequent post on X. He pointed out that an extremely short timeframe has been given to affected creditors to respond. The motion was filed on July 2 and objections are due by July 15. $500 million in claims are at stake which accounts for 5% of all creditor claims. Of this, 82% of these claims belong to Chinese creditors. In a series of follow-up posts, the bankruptcy professional describes several procedural issues that he believes will result in it being incredibly difficult for affected creditors to have their funds reimbursed.Mr. Purple concludes:”The incentives are designed to be extremely risk averse in finding [a legal opinion] that paying creditors is legal! [The estate’s lawyers will] take the fees and say its not legal.” In his court filing, the Chinese creditor, who is resident in Singapore, stated: “My family holds four KYC-verified accounts with aggregate claims exceeding $15 million USD.” . . . “We have fully complied with every procedural requirement under the Plan. The proposed motion now jeopardizes our right to distribution in an arbitrary and inequitable manner.” On X, he asserted that the FTX Recovery Trust’s motion “constitutes an impermissible and material modification of the Plan.” Aside from legal action, the only other potential solution for creditors residing in restricted countries is to sell their claims. However, claims buyers are pricing in greater risk with lower rates and less favorable terms.

Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), which oversees Hong Kong’s securities and futures markets, is understood to be planning to give the go-ahead for crypto derivative products to be offered to professional investors within the Chinese autonomous territory. Chinese English-language newspaper China Daily reported on June 4 that the proposed move forms part of Hong Kong’s efforts to expand its digital assets-related product offering in order to further bolster its position as a leading regional hub for the sector. Christopher Hui, Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, told the publication that the SFC will open up crypto derivatives trading to professional investors in the city “in an orderly, transparent and secure manner.”Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashBoosting liquidity to spot marketsChina Daily claimed that the SFC outlined that the crypto derivatives product will enable efficient risk transfers, while boosting the liquidity of the underlying spot markets. TokenInsight data suggests that the global crypto derivatives market has reached $21 trillion in trading volume over the course of Q1 2025. By comparison, derivatives trading dwarfs spot trading, given that spot trading weighed in at just $4.6 trillion over the same period. Liquidity in the underlying spot markets can be enhanced by a broadening of crypto derivatives product offerings in instances where digital assets are traded for immediate payment and delivery. Their availability will also appeal to professional traders and investors who need access to derivatives as part of their overall strategies in order to hedge positions and add leverage when required. Industry interestReaction to news of the Hong Kong SFC’s plans has largely been positive. Back in February, Jean-David Péquignot, chief commercial officer (CCO) with the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange Deribit, told the South China Morning Post that opening up availability of crypto derivatives products was the one item missing from Hong Kong’s push towards development as a hub for the digital assets sector. At the time, he stated:“Hong Kong is this central financial hub in the world and a big one in Asia. If regulators can solve the derivatives piece, it is a place where we love to be.” On that basis, Péquignot suggested that Deribit, headquartered in Dubai, would be interested in establishing itself in Hong Kong, suggesting that “Asia is a big market for derivatives.” He added:“We want to be in Asia. We just need to find the right place and time to engage with regulators and get a regulatory framework to work with.” The company’s acquisition by Coinbase was announced last month for $2.9 billion. Regulatory approach questionedWhile many see the move towards the approval of crypto derivatives in Hong Kong as bullish, not everyone perceives the regulator’s approach in this instance to be positive. Pseudonymous crypto trader “Pickle Cat” outlined on X that “opening crypto derivatives only to 'professional investors' isn’t progress.”  The trader points out that good regulation would concentrate on controlling issuance and not circulation. Suggesting that the SFC has missed the point in its approach, the trader claims that the regulator would serve the crypto derivatives market best by verifying what backs such products while not restricting how such tokens move.