Japan’s FSA set to approve JPYC stablecoin

Cake Group co-founder files application to wind up company in SingaporeChua U-Zyn, the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of crypto firm Cake Group, has officially applied to the Singapore High Court to initiate the winding-up process for the company.A winding-up notice appeared in Singapore’s The Straits Times on Thursday. U-Zyn is being represented by law firm Rajah & Tann on the matter. The court will now decide whether to grant this application, which was filed on Dec. 1.Photo by Kelvin Zyteng on UnsplashFinancial strugglesCake Group is the parent company of the crypto platform Bake, which made headlines last month for announcing significant staff reductions affecting 30% of its workforce. Bake is an automated market maker (AMM) and decentralized exchange (DEX) that revolves around Binance’s BNB Smart Chain (BSC).In existence for some five years, the platform claims to have over 1 million users worldwide, retaining over $1 billion in customer assets and having achieved reward payouts to date of $411 million.Cake Group’s financial struggles have been evident, with its revenue plummeting by over half to $266 million in 2022, while profits experienced a fivefold decrease to $23.5 million during the same period. The company generates income through transaction fees.A hearing for creditors or opposing parties is scheduled for Dec. 22, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to voice concerns or contest the winding-up process.Internal disputeWhile the specifics behind U-Zyn’s winding-up application remain unclear, the decline in financial performance and the recent layoffs are undoubtedly contributing factors.It’s understood that CEO Julian Hosp learned about the filing on Dec. 6 and has since emphasized that the company is actively working with legal counsel to challenge the application. Hosp will challenge this request in court, asserting that the company’s finances are strong and unrelated to the dispute.Taking to the X social media platform on Thursday, Hosp wrote:”Disappointed to see U-Zyn filing a request on December 1st” . . . “For me, it’s selfish that he’s prioritizing his own interests over those of our customers, employees, and partners, instead of resolving it internally.”Hosp added that U-Zyn’s application is unrelated to the company’s finances and that the firm is financially solvent.Former employees, speaking anonymously to Tech in Asia, expressed surprise at the escalating situation, describing the co-founders as emotionally charged and seemingly unable to safeguard their investment.U-Zyn opposed to layoffsThe court filing under Section 125(1)(i) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018 adds an element of uncertainty. Unlike other sections that typically specify reasons for winding up, this particular section allows for liquidation if “the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company be wound up.”Hosp clarified that the application is not based on Cake Group’s inability to pay its debts, emphasizing that day-to-day operations continue at full capacity.It’s understood that the ongoing dispute between U-Zyn and Hosp stems from internal disagreements, particularly related to cuts within the company’s engineering division. Chua claimed Hosp excluded him from decisions, especially concerning the recent layoffs.Despite the internal discord, Hosp stressed the company’s commitment to resolving the dispute swiftly and maintaining its operational capabilities. Undeterred by his fellow co-founder’s actions, he published a blog post on Thursday, outlining his vision for the Cake Group moving forward.

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship. 

Indonesia Embraces XRP, ADA as Tradable Crypto AssetsIn a significant move towards cryptocurrency acceptance, the Indonesian government has taken a momentous step by including a range of digital assets, including XRP and ADA, in a recently published regulatory document.Photo by Nick Agus Arya on Unsplash501 digital assetsThe document, published earlier this month, comprises an extensive list of 501 cryptocurrencies that are eligible for trading within the country. Unsurprisingly, BTC and ETH feature on the list. Other notable cryptocurrencies that have been listed include SOL, LTC, DOT, SAND, and UNI. This development is seen as a positive stride towards wider crypto adoption and holds the potential for broader use of all of these assets. In the case of XRP, it provides it with greater potential to become a viable means of payment within the region in the future, even though current regulation within Indonesia prohibits payments for goods and services in anything other than the rupiah.Defining tradable assetsThe regulatory document, officially titled “Supervisory Body Regulation Commodity Futures Trading Number 4 of 2023,” signifies an amendment to the Trade Controlling Agency Regulations Commodity Futures Number 11 of 2022. Its main objective is to identify the assets that can be traded in the physical market of crypto assets within Indonesia.Colin Wu, a prominent Chinese reporter, shared this significant development on Twitter, sparking interest and discussions within the crypto community. The news has been met with a mix of optimism and caution from Indonesian individuals. One Indonesian YouTuber expressed enthusiasm for the country’s XRP-friendly stance and voiced hope for XRP to eventually attain legal tender status. However, others, like Twitter user Pondok Indah, urged the government to focus on regulatory oversight and taxation rather than direct involvement in the crypto business.This development takes place in the broader context of Indonesia’s evolving crypto landscape. According to a 2022 research report titled “The 2022 Global Crypto Adoption Index: Emerging Markets Lead in Grassroots Adoption ‘’ by Chainalysis, Indonesia ranked at the top among the 20 countries analyzed in terms of peer-to-peer (P2P) exchange trade volume. The country has demonstrated its active participation in the crypto market, with Indodax, the largest Indonesian exchange, adding support for FLOKI, an up-and-coming cryptocurrency, back in April.That said, as we’ve seen in many other jurisdictions, the development of regulation and policy relative to digital assets has not been without its hiccups. Last month, the governor of Bali warned the foreign tourists that flock to the Indonesian island that there would be consequences for those that flouted Indonesian law and used crypto as a form of payment for goods and services.Indonesia’s recognition of the potential benefits of digital assets demonstrates a path forward for other nations to follow. Providing regulatory clarity with regard to digital assets bolsters investor confidence but also opens doors for innovation and financial inclusion. In taking this approach, the Southeast Asian country is setting the stage through which digital assets can contribute to economic growth and technological advancement.