Filipino legislator proposes bill to establish Bitcoin reserve

Crypto Influencer Arrested in Hong Kong Over JPEX AssociationHong Kong police have taken prominent social media influencer and former lawyer Joseph Lam into custody. Known as “Jolamchok” on Instagram, Lam has been arrested due to his connection with the troubled cryptocurrency exchange, JPEX.According to a report from the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Monday, law enforcement officials conducted a search of his office, where they seized various items of potential evidence, including a plastic bag containing banknotes.Photo by niu niu on UnsplashCelebrity promotionThe Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), recently issued a warning squarely pointing fingers at JPEX for actively enlisting online celebrities like Joseph Lam and over-the-counter (OTC) money changers to promote the platform’s services and products to the Hong Kong public. Hong Kong police are understood to have searched the offices of local OTC exchange service Coingaroo. That action is suspected to be related to the issues that have befallen JPEX.An unverified report suggests that Lam, who is also known as Lin Zuo, may have presented questionable investment “schemes” to a cryptocurrency investment chat group. One of the reported victims was allegedly persuaded to invest 100,000 Hong Kong dollars (approximately $12,800) in cryptocurrencies.In one instance, Lam made claims within the group, stating that people were relentlessly pursuing him for payments and that the amount of money involved was five times higher than usual.“Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”On September 17, the day before his arrest, Lam shared a news article on his Instagram account, suggesting that he had not been negatively affected by the JPEX investigations. The caption read, “Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”Following this development, Lam visited the police alongside his legal representatives to provide the necessary information regarding his involvement with JPEX. In a related development, another crypto influencer, Chen Yi, is understood to have been arrested. Yi is suspected of conspiracy to commit fraud.Liquidity crisisJPEX has publicly attributed its liquidity crisis to regulatory pressures and “third-party market makers.” In response, the exchange increased withdrawal fees and suspended certain operations. They have, however, promised to restore liquidity from third-party market makers promptly and gradually return withdrawal fees to normal levels, with details to follow after negotiations.JPEX maintains that it was being treated unfairly. The exchange also said that it would freeze new trades while existing trades would continue to be active until completion.This arrest and the ongoing issues surrounding JPEX come amid wider concerns in the cryptocurrency sector. A recent report from Bitfinex indicated that capital outflows from the crypto markets amounted to a staggering $55 billion in August alone. This substantial outflow has not only impacted Bitcoin but has also affected the liquidity of Ether and stablecoins, underlining the broader challenges faced by the crypto sector.As the investigation into Joseph Lam’s involvement with JPEX continues, it remains to be seen how this development will impact the ongoing troubles facing the cryptocurrency exchange and the broader crypto ecosystem in Hong Kong and beyond.

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight. 

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.