Four in 10 wealthy UAE investors hold crypto, survey finds

Seoul Auction Blue seeks to register security tokens with the FSS for Andy Warhol’s artworkSeoul Auction Blue, the operator of fractional artwork investment platform Sotwo, recently submitted an application to the South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), local news outlet Seoul Economic Daily reported on Wednesday (local time). Its aim is to register security tokens linked to artworks with the financial authority, marking it the third entity in the country to pursue this innovative financial venture.Photo by Guido Coppa on UnsplashAndy Warhol’s ‘Dollar Sign’The artwork investment app plans to issue security tokens based on Andy Warhol’s “Dollar Sign,” a piece measuring 51.0 cm in height and 40.5 cm in length. This artwork was purchased by Seoul Auction Blue at an auction for KRW 626.2 million (approximately $485,000). The total value of the security tokens, inclusive of issuance costs, is approximately KRW 700 million. The firm will issue a total of 7,000 tokens, each valued at KRW 100,000. Upon receiving regulatory approval, Seoul Auction Blue is set to open for subscription requests from Dec. 20 to 26.In its endeavor to issue digital investment contract securities, Seoul Auction Blue has meticulously prepared its documentation in line with the FSS’s guidelines. The selection of the artwork of Andy Warhol, the renowned and iconic 20th-century artist, aligns with the FSS’s recommendation to choose a significant piece by an internationally acclaimed artist. This strategic choice reflects the company’s commitment to compliance and the recognition of Warhol’s global stature in the art world.Preventing conflicts of interestThe registration application submitted by Seoul Auction Blue includes specific restrictions aimed at preventing conflicts of interest with its affiliates related to security tokens. As per these rules, the company is barred from buying idle assets of affiliates to back its security tokens. Instead, Seoul Auction Blue is permitted to acquire them only through public methods like participating in an open bid or a post-sale bid process. Notably, the token issuer is in principle prohibited from purchasing these assets via intermediaries in private sales or any other non-transparent settings.The acquisition of underlying assets requires approval from the compliance monitoring committee. Furthermore, this regulation strips Seoul Auction Blue of the capacity to determine the final trading prices or conditions for these transactions.In addition, the company is collaborating with a couple of securities firms to safeguard investors’ funds, creating a buffer against any potential bankruptcy of the issuer. The funds raised from subscriptions for the security tokens will be managed in accounts overseen by KB Securities. Additionally, an investor protection fund is being set up, which will be handled as a trust fund by Shinhan Securities. This fund acts as an extra layer of security, offering investors enhanced protection for their investments.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and primary financial regulator, has set a deadline of June 30 for unlicensed digital token service providers (DTSPs) working out of Singapore to cease offering their services to clients in overseas markets.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashResponding to feedbackThe deadline emerged by way of a process MAS has followed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSM Act). Last October, the regulator invited feedback from stakeholders related to the authority’s approach to the regulation of DTSPs. MAS published its response to that feedback on May 30.  It stated:”DTSPs which are subject to a licensing requirement under section 137 of the FSM Act must suspend or cease carrying on a business of providing DT services outside Singapore by 30 June 2025.” It added that it was not including any transitional arrangement for DTSPs despite MAS receiving such a suggestion from a number of feedback respondents. Instead, unlicensed DTSPs will need to abide by the June 30 deadline and have acquired a license by then or cease unlicensed activity.The regulator defines DTSPs as individuals, partnerships or Singapore corporations operating from a place of business in Singapore, including those formed or incorporated in Singapore who offer digital token services outside Singapore. Those found in breach of the regulation could face up to three years in prison and fines of up to S$250,000 ($195,000). Companies who have already obtained licensing or those exempted by way of the Securities and Futures Act, Payment Services Act and the Financial Advisers Act are free to continue trading. Challenging licensing requirementsThose who wish to become compliant will have to satisfy some challenging requirements. For those granted a license, an annual license fee of S$10,000 ($7,780) applies. Small-scale DTSPs need to satisfy a $150,000 ($116,670) ongoing capital requirement, while larger, well-established DTSPs must comply with a S$250,000 ($195,000) capital requirement. Additionally, MAS has put in place competency requirements related to a DTSP's CEO, directors, partners and managers. Hagen Rooke, a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, outlined on LinkedIn that while it's possible for unlicensed operators to obtain licensing, it will be very difficult to get a license. In its feedback response document, the regulator stated: “MAS will approach the licensing of DTSPs in a prudent and cautious manner and there will be extremely limited circumstances under which MAS will consider granting an applicant a licence under section 138 of the FSM Act.” Rooke advised crypto companies that may be affected to act swiftly in order to derisk through an operational restructuring or removing the businesses' Singapore touchpoints. He suggested that firms need to consider if it has customers outside of Singapore or front-office functions located outside of the city-state to determine if they could be affected by this regulatory measure. A number of Asian countries have moved to take action against unlicensed foreign firms that have engaged with local investors, with Thailand becoming the latest country to do so recently. However, the Singaporean authorities have approached the issue from the opposite perspective, citing the potential reputational risk that unlicensed DTSPs pose for Singapore.

Silence From Multichain’s Chinese Developers Stokes FearA prolonged silence from the project leadership behind Multichain, a cross-chain routing network, is causing growing concern among the users of the cross-chain protocol. The network currently holds $1.5 billion in total value locked (TVL).The protocol has experienced five days of stuck transactions, and multiple cross-chain bridge pathways, including Kava, zkSync, and Polygon zkEVM are still offline. Initially, the project’s China-based team attributed the issues to an upgrade that was being fixed. That explanation was changed recently to an ambiguous “force majeure,” leaving users with more questions than answers.Photo by Santiago Lacarta on UnsplashPossible arrests in ChinaAdding to the uncertainty are rumors circulating on Twitter that the core leadership team may have been arrested in China. Although the rumors remain unconfirmed, they have contributed to the growing sense of unease within the community. DJ Qian, one of the co-founders of Multichain who is no longer involved with the project, took to Twitter to share his attempts to seek clarification. Qian mentioned reaching out to Multichain CEO Zhaojun and founding partner Xu Guochang for technical assistance. When asked about Zhaojun’s availability, Qian stated that he was “not available yet.”Users and investors eagerly await updates and clarity from Multichain’s leadership team. However, the team’s lack of communication extends across various forms of social media. In group Telegram messages with the Multichain team, there have been no responses from Zhaojun, and direct messages through the same app have gone unanswered as well. This silence has left the community members puzzled, with little information to rely on.$MULTI price plummetsMeanwhile, the price of Multichain’s native token, $MULTI, has continued to decline. It currently stands at $4.37, representing a 20% decrease over the past 24 hours. The lack of communication and uncertainty surrounding the project have likely contributed to this downward trend in token price. Over the course of the past seven days, the token has decreased in price by 45%.In response to the situation, layer 1 blockchain project Conflux Network has taken precautionary measures by suspending Multichain’s co-mint privileges. This move prevents Multichain from minting tokens on the Conflux blockchain. The Conflux Network has also assured users that it will work with them in case any losses arise due to the ongoing issues.Flight to safetyOther projects and individuals have also reacted to the silence from Multichain’s team. Hong Kong-based HashKey Group, a crypto investment firm, has transferred $250,000 to crypto exchange Gate.io as a precautionary measure. Tron founder Justin Sun has withdrawn 470,000 of the $USDD stablecoin from the Multichain protocol. These actions reflect a growing concern among stakeholders, representing their efforts to mitigate potential risks associated with the uncertainty surrounding Multichain.Furthermore, the Fantom Foundation has withdrawn $2.4 million in liquidity of the protocol’s native $MULTI tokens from the decentralized exchange SushiSwap. It later tweeted out an update stating that the Fantom-Multichain bridge was operating as normal. These withdrawals signal a loss of confidence in Multichain and its native token, as stakeholders seek to protect their investments.As the silence persists, users and investors remain anxious for updates and clarifications from Multichain’s leadership team. The lack of communication and the circulating rumors have cast a shadow of uncertainty over the project, leaving stakeholders in a state of limbo.