Bitcoin pullback tests sentiment as analysts revisit long-term targets

BitGo, an American regulated digital asset custody firm, has achieved in-principle approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license, marking a significant milestone in its global expansion efforts.Photo by Sergio Sala on UnsplashExtending global footprintIn a recent social media post, BitGo expressed its enthusiasm for the approval, positioning itself closer to providing specialized trading services for non-retail investors. The company sees this as an opportunity to extend its global footprint and offer regulated, secure and trusted solutions in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. Lim Ho Beng, BitGo's Asia-Pacific managing director, emphasized Singapore's regulatory clarity regarding digital assets and its status as a leading innovation hub and gateway to the Asia-Pacific as key factors driving BitGo's expansion into the Republic. In a statement provided to The Block, the company outlined that in operating as a crypto brokerage in Singapore, that would position BitGo “as a leading provider of digital asset services for institutional finance throughout APAC.” Expanding service offeringWith the full license on the horizon, BitGo Singapore Pte. Ltd. is aiming to broaden its services in the city-state, facilitating institutional clients in purchasing and selling cryptocurrencies directly from its cold storage custody solution. BitGo CEO Mike Belshe acknowledged the significance of the MAS in-principle approval, particularly following the recent acquisition of the company's German license. Belshe emphasized the company's commitment to providing clients with regulated, secure and trusted solutions as it expands its global presence. Additional licensing successBefore this achievement in Singapore, BitGo had already made notable strides in the global digital asset custody arena. The company secured a crypto custody license from Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), a crucial step in its European expansion strategy. BitGo Deutschland GmbH, established in 2020, initially operated under a transitional regime in Germany before obtaining the full license, aligning with the company's dedication to operating in regulatory-compliant markets. Dejan Maljevic, BitGo’s Managing European Director, commended BaFin's role as a global trendsetter in crypto regulation, providing a secure regulatory framework that facilitates progress in digital currencies. In addition to its presence in Germany, BitGo obtained approval from the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) for the New York Trust Charter. This authorization allows BitGo to extend its custody services to a broader range of institutional clients in New York, further solidifying its position as a trusted player in the digital asset custody space. BitGo was one of the first crypto custodians to emerge in catering to institutional clients. It will compete with firms like Zodia Custody, a digital asset custodian backed by Japan’s SBI Holdings and British bank Standard Chartered, which launched its services in Singapore last September. In August, BitGo raised $100 million in Series C funding, based on a company valuation of $1.75 billion. The crypto custodian continues to navigate regulatory landscapes globally, emphasizing its commitment to offering secure and compliant solutions to institutional clients across various jurisdictions.

Indonesia witnessed a striking decline in cryptocurrency tax revenue for the year 2023, according to local media. 63% decreaseA report by Indonesian business and financial publication Kontan detailed a tax take drop to $31.7 million (Indonesian rupiah 467.27 billion). That tax collection is in sharp contrast to the partial collection period in 2022 when the crypto tax regime was initially introduced. It represents a drop of around 63%. The decline is part of a broader tax reform targeting the "digital economy" implemented in 2022, with the Indonesian government expressing the expectation that the reform would enhance tax collection, fostering a "healthy and fair taxation system."Photo by Nick Agus Arya on UnsplashDeclining transaction volumesDespite bitcoin's impressive surge of approximately 160% throughout 2023, the dip in crypto tax revenue was notable. The decrease is closely tied to a drop in transaction volumes over the same period compared to 2022. A report by CoinDesk Indonesia last week put that trading volume decrease at around 60%. Crypto transactions in Indonesia face dual taxation – a 0.1% income tax and a 0.11% value-added tax (VAT). Additionally, local crypto exchanges are subject to a special tax of approximately 0.04%, contributing to the national digital asset bourse. Disadvantaging local exchangesLocal exchanges in Indonesia, including prominent ones like Indodax, have voiced discontent with the high tax rates, contending that these levies are driving users towards unregulated offshore exchanges. Earlier this month Indodax CEO Oscar Darmawan called on the Indonesian government to review crypto tax rates. Darmawan highlighted that the cumulative taxes on crypto transactions often surpass the trading fees paid by users, posing a risk of users seeking more cost-effective alternatives. Local exchanges suggest that crypto transactions should only be subject to income tax, eliminating the VAT component. This proposal comes as Indonesia's Financial Services Authority (OJK) prepares to implement cryptocurrency regulations in early 2025. The aim is to align the taxation of cryptocurrencies with their market nature, possibly redefining them more as securities than commodities. Inadequate tax regulation can lead to a decline in local market activities, potentially resulting in capital flight to more favorable jurisdictions. Indonesia's situation serves as a reminder of the crucial need for policies that understand and adapt to the dynamic nature of the cryptocurrency sector. India is being similarly challenged. Local exchanges there have also complained of punitive taxation, which resulted in Indian users migrating to offshore exchanges. That scenario led indigenous exchanges to lobby the government to take action. The authorities have duly acted, flagging a number of global exchanges for operating illegally within India. It’s not all bad news for the development of digital assets within Indonesia. The country still ranks highly in terms of crypto adoption within the Asian region. Crypto was also floated as an election issue recently by Gibran Rakabuming Raka, a vice-presidential candidate in the upcoming election. The politician expressed his commitment to accelerating the country's position as a leader in the digital revolution. 

Dubai Regulator Hits OPNX With $2.7M PenaltyCrypto bankruptcy claims trading platform OPNX and its founders have been hit with a hefty fine, imposed by Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). The penalty, amounting to AED 10 million ($2.7 million), was levied on the newly established exchange in accordance with a notice published by the regulator on Wednesday.Photo by Agnieszka Stankiewicz on UnsplashPayment outstandingVARA’s recent announcement highlighted that the fine had been imposed in May and remains outstanding. The regulatory body disclosed that individual fines of AED 200,000 ($54,451) each were imposed on Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the controversial founders of failed Singapore-based crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Additionally, fines were also imposed on two other co-founders of OPNX. The penalties were attributed to failures in adhering to regulations governing marketing, advertising, and promotions.OPNX, established earlier this year by Su Zhu and Kyle Davies in collaboration with Mark Lamb and Sudhu Arumugam, positioned itself as a trading platform for crypto claims following the collapse of their Three Arrows Capital (3AC) fund last summer. The duo has since made Dubai their primary operational base.Further action“In light of the company’s unpaid fine, VARA shall determine consequential actions warranted against OPNX, which may include further fines, penalties, and/or taking any actions necessary to recover payment and definitively remedy the behavior,” stated VARA in an official statement.Dubai is making a concerted effort to nurture the development of crypto-related business, implementing various initiatives in order to bring that about. However, as part of that strategy, Dubai’s regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies has taken a more stringent turn this year, with the introduction of a new regulatory framework mandating that companies catering to retail investors must secure full licensing from VARA.Concerns arose in February when regulatory authorities discovered that OPNX was actively seeking customers for its platform and collecting personal data without proper authorization.Formal reprimandsIn April VARA issued an investor alert, outlining that OPNX was not a regulated entity although it was operating from Dubai. Shortly afterwards, formal reprimands followed for the two 3AC founders, alongside Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, and OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb.Leslie Lamb, in a previous interview with Bloomberg, emphasized that OPNX had not actively marketed itself toward Dubai or the broader UAE market. She stressed the company’s full cooperation with VARA’s ongoing investigation, asserting that no regulatory guidelines had been breached.“While Kyle and I contributed the initial ideas for OPNX, Leslie is very much the CEO, and we aren’t involved in day-to-day operations,” stated Su Zhu, clarifying their roles.Despite the regulatory setback, both Su Zhu and Kyle Davies continued to promote OPNX on the X platform (formerly known as Twitter).It emerged recently that the claims trading platform has been eyeing the acquisition of failed crypto lender Hodlnaut, which is currently undergoing court-supervised restructuring in Singapore. Zhu and Davies have come in for a lot of criticism within the crypto sector, having left a long list of unpaid creditors as a consequence of the failure of 3AC. The duo recently suggested that they would contribute profits from OPNX to 3AC creditors despite the fact that they have been uncooperative with the 3AC bankruptcy process.