Korea tightens crypto oversight as major merger targets Nasdaq listing

Blockstream, a blockchain technology firm headquartered in British Columbia, Canada, has moved to expand its activities in Japan with the opening of a new office and the announcement of a partnership with local companies. The infrastructure development company has partnered with Diamond Hands and Fulgar Ventures, CoinDesk Japan reported. Diamond Hands is a Japan-based company involved in providing Bitcoin-related products. It helps companies to integrate Bitcoin and lightning payments into their services. Based in Wilmington, Delaware, Fulgur Ventures invests in early-stage startups. It is particularly focused on Bitcoin and Lightning Network-related projects.Photo by David Edelstein on UnsplashBootstrapping brand awareness Fulgur Ventures is Blockstream’s largest shareholder. The objective is to bootstrap brand awareness within Japan using these partnerships with local companies. To that end, Diamond Hands CEO Koji Higashi will become Blockstream’s brand ambassador. It’s thought that efforts will be made going forward to further expand partnerships with local Japanese companies. Blockstream announced in a press release that it aims to drive adoption of self-custody technologies and Bitcoin layer-2 innovations within the East Asian country. Furthermore, it plans to drive adoption of real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. Commenting on the development, Blockstream Founder and CEO Adam Back stated:"With increased regulatory clarity and rising institutional interest in Bitcoin now is the moment for Blockstream to establish a direct presence in Japan, one of our most important markets." Back added that the company is looking forward to “empowering Japanese enterprises and individuals to fully harness Bitcoin as the foundation for a financial future that's secure, scalable and decentralized.” Tokyo office Another aspect to the expansion involves the opening of an office in Tokyo by Blockstream.  Adam Back is a Bitcoin OG who has often been the subject of speculation in attempts to identify pseudonymous Bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto. Back proposed Hashcash, a proof-of-work-based system and forerunner to Bitcoin, in 1997. The Japanese corporate world has demonstrated its interest in Bitcoin in recent months, with local company Metaplanet launching an ambitious plan to acquire 21,000 Bitcoin by 2026, having adopted the Bitcoin playbook pioneered by American business intelligence and Bitcoin development company MicroStrategy. Blockstream’s investment arm, Blockstream Capital, has also been active in the market. Last month, the company invested $75 million into crypto custodian Komainu. Komainu is a joint venture between CoinShares, Ledger and Japanese global financial services company Nomura.  The same month, the company launched two institutional-grade Bitcoin investment funds. The funds, Blockstream Income Fund and Blockstream Alpha Fund, have been devised to cater to a growing demand from institutions for transparent, regulated and secure financial products. A third fund, Blockstream Yield Fund, is due to launch later this year. It will offer Bitcoin holders consistent, low-risk returns on their holdings. Blockstream was founded in 2014. In its earlier years, the company has served as a technology provider relative to the Liquid Network. In Core Lightning, it has developed a well-recognized implementation of the Lightning Network protocol.  To facilitate Bitcoin holders in terms of self-custody of the leading crypto asset, Blockstream developed Blockstream Jade, a hardware wallet built on open-source software. The device offers air-gapped functionality, meaning that users can perform transactions without connecting the device itself directly to the internet.

Indian PM Narendra Modi Calls for Global Crypto Regulatory FrameworkAmid the rising tide of emerging technologies like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has emphasized the urgent need for a worldwide regulatory framework to ensure user safety and ethical utilization.His remarks were delivered at the G20 Summit India 2023, where he stressed the importance of cohesive global efforts in shaping the future of technological advancements.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashG20 PresidencyIndia, currently holding the G20 Presidency for 2023, has taken a strong stance in advocating for the establishment of a comprehensive global regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Earlier this month, the country released a presidency note outlining its insights into the proposed framework.These recommendations are closely aligned with the guidelines set forth by authoritative bodies such as the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).Notably, India’s presidency note extended its considerations beyond established economies to include provisions for developing nations relative to crypto. At the time, it was revealed that a collaborative “synthesis paper” was in the works, jointly crafted by the IMF and the FSB. This paper, set to be unveiled by the end of August, will delve into the global macro implications stemming from the adoption and growth of cryptocurrency. The timing of this release is particularly significant, coinciding with the upcoming G20 Summit scheduled for September 9.Establishing a global frameworkAddressing the G20 Summit, Prime Minister Modi articulated his vision for a world unified under a comprehensive regulatory framework not only for cryptocurrencies but also for the ethical utilization of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence. In an interview with media platform Business Today, he emphasized the reality of rapid technological progress sweeping across the globe. Instead of dismissing or wishing away these advancements, Modi underscored the need for proactive adoption, democratization, and a unified global approach.Modi’s perspective underscores his support for a harmonized global strategy when it comes to formulating regulatory frameworks for emerging technologies. Drawing a parallel with the aviation industry, he highlighted how air traffic control and air security are governed by common global rules and regulations, illustrating the effectiveness of a consensus-based model.Expanding on the implications of India’s G20 presidency, Modi shed light on the deliberations centered around cryptocurrency’s potential impact within broader macroeconomic contexts, particularly within emerging and developing economies.Regulatory needs at a national levelWithin India, various stakeholders have been struggling with the regulation of cryptocurrencies themselves. In July, the Indian Supreme Court criticized the government for its failure to establish clear crypto-related regulations. The country’s central bank, the Royal Bank of India (RBI), has been less enthusiastic about decentralized cryptocurrency, warning of the risks extended by stablecoins more recently. Instead, it has proven to be far more interested in advancing the use of permissioned blockchain networks and a central bank digital currency (CBDC).The proposition of a globally accepted set of guidelines for cryptocurrency regulation has garnered substantial support from authorities worldwide as they begin to understand the difficulty that decentralized technology presents in terms of controlling it. If Modi’s vision translates into reality, it could mark a significant step toward standardizing the governance of cryptocurrencies on an international scale.

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading FeesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently eliminated trading fees, but their bold decision hasn’t yielded much results. Bithumb was the first to implement this change and attracted users for about a week, but it is now seeing a loss in market share. Korbit, following Bithumb’s example, is also struggling to achieve meaningful outcomes.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashLimited impactLocal media outlet Chosun Biz used data from crypto data platform CoinGecko to draw this conclusion. On October 26, Korbit’s daily trading volume represented 0.19% of the total trading volume among South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax). This figure marked a 0.14 percentage point increase compared to the 0.05% recorded on October 19. Korbit had implemented a zero trading fee policy at 9 a.m. (KST) on October 20. Additionally, they launched a promotion offering KRW 5,000 ($3.69) worth of bitcoin to users who transferred virtual assets totaling KRW 1 million or more from Travel Rule-compliant exchanges to Korbit. While the promotion did contribute to Korbit’s market share, it still remains below 1%.Bithumb’s performance showed some improvement, albeit briefly. As of October 26, Bithumb’s market share stood at 18%, marking a 4.7 percentage point increase from its 13.3% share on October 3, the day before it eliminated trading fees. However, it’s worth noting that its market share had reached almost 30% shortly after the promotion’s launch. This indicates that its strategy is losing efficacy over time.The less-than-enthusiastic results from their daring marketing endeavors can be attributed to their inability to draw in retail investors. To begin with, Upbit, the leading player in the market, had already been providing a relatively low fee of 0.05%. Furthermore, adapting to new user interfaces on these exchanges posed a challenge. Zero trading fees weren’t attractive enough for crypto investors to leave their current platforms.Trading volume mattersIn the case of Korbit, its lower trading volume was a disadvantage when it came to attracting users. On crypto exchanges, a higher trading volume typically translates to faster trade executions. As a result, users of Korbit might experience delays in executing trades at their preferred price.Jeong Hye-won, a research associate at crypto data analytics platform Xangle, told Chosun Biz that users on exchanges with lower trading volumes tend to experience slippages due to slower transaction speeds and sparsely populated order books. A slippage means the difference between the initially placed order price and the executed order price. Jeong further explained that Korbit’s zero trading fee policy didn’t have a significant impact because it offers fewer listed tokens compared to Upbit and Bithumb.There is speculation that the free-trading fee promotions introduced by Bithumb and Korbit, despite their revenue sacrifices, might conclude sooner than initially anticipated due to their perceived ineffectiveness. Bithumb derives 99.95% of its revenue from trading fees, while Korbit relies on trading fees for 99.79% of its income. An industry insider has commented that trading fees play a vital role in an exchange’s revenue, and given Bithumb’s reported loss in earnings during the second quarter, there are concerns about their capacity to sustain this strategy.