Top

Chinese industry bodies issue joint warning on crypto fraud and RWA risks

Policy & Regulation·December 08, 2025, 3:22 AM

Chinese financial industry groups have warned that illegal fundraising and fraud are increasingly emerging through stablecoins, airdrops, real-world asset (RWA) tokens, and crypto mining schemes, according to a Dec. 5 notice carried by the state-run Xinhua News Agency.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/d0013ce7cec0e7a0be2a6b0062931139.webp
Photo by Othman Alghanmi on Unsplash

The joint warning was issued by seven major bodies: the National Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association, the Securities Association of China, the Asset Management Association of China, the China Futures Association, the China Association for Public Companies, and the Payment & Clearing Association of China.

 

These groups stated that such products are being used to drive speculative trading, pyramid schemes, and other illicit activities that threaten financial stability. They stressed that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in China and do not share the legal status of fiat currency, further noting that regulators have not approved any RWA tokenization activities.

 

Crypto and RWA offerings prohibited

Consequently, the notice bars member institutions from directly or indirectly providing services related to the issuance or trading of cryptocurrencies or RWA tokens. The associations also urged members to intensify risk warnings and investor education, while encouraging the public to report suspected violations.

 

This industry alert follows the central bank’s recent reiteration of its concerns regarding speculative crypto activity. According to Reuters, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) last month restated its ban on crypto-related business, citing a resurgence in speculation and compliance gaps in stablecoins that complicate risk management. The central bank plans to tighten enforcement against unlawful operations, reinforcing the blanket ban on crypto transactions and mining imposed in September 2021.

 

Old Bitcoin loan feud resurfaces

Despite this restrictive framework, disputes tied to legacy crypto dealings continue to surface. Cryptopolitan reported that a long-running controversy has re-emerged surrounding Li Feng, a co-founder of Moore Threads, a Chinese GPU designer widely viewed as a homegrown rival to Nvidia. According to Cryptopolitan, the scrutiny follows the company's Dec. 5 debut on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, where it raised 8 billion yuan ($1.1 billion). Reportedly, Li faces accusations of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin allegedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing.

 

Citing a Foresight News post referenced by analyst AB Kuai.Dong on X, the report indicates that Li and angel investor Xue Manzi launched a cryptocurrency in 2017, raising 5,000 ETH. According to the outlet, Li has been accused of failing to repay 1,500 Bitcoin that he purportedly borrowed from OKX founder Xu Mingxing.

 

Xu is said to have raised the issue publicly and sought resolution through legal proceedings in both China and the U.S. However, the legal ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies at the time was viewed as a major obstacle to settlement. Li, for his part, has characterized Xu’s contribution as a failed investment.

 

The situation took a constructive turn when Xu reposted AB Kuai.Dong’s post, saying observers should look past old disputes. Xu encouraged a focus on constructive industry growth and stated that debt matters should be left to legal channels, offering goodwill toward fellow entrepreneurs.

 

The timing of the renewed dispute alongside recent industry warnings highlights a consistent focus on risk control and legal clarity within China’s digital asset space. Authorities continue to emphasize investor protection and formal reporting channels to curb speculation, while market participants are increasingly turning to legal avenues to resolve legacy issues. These developments point to a sector still wrestling with unresolved disputes and regulatory gaps, underscoring the need for clearer rules for both regulators and entrepreneurs.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 12, 2023

Crypto.com Complies with UK FCA’s New Digital Asset Rules

Crypto.com Complies with UK FCA’s New Digital Asset RulesWhile some Asian crypto platforms are struggling to comply with the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regarding new marketing-related rules that took effect on October 8, Singapore’s Crypto.com has confirmed its successful compliance. The firm is registered as FORIS DAX UK LIMITED on the FCA website.Photo by Paul Fiedler on UnsplashContinuing support for UK customersAs a result, UK customers can continue to access Crypto.com’s products and services without disruption. The company emphasized its commitment to strengthening its platform and presence in the UK market. Crypto.com stated that it fully supports measures aimed at enhancing consumer safety and security in the cryptocurrency industry. The company also expressed its ongoing cooperation with UK and international regulators to foster consumer confidence in the crypto sector.Effective from October 8, the FCA’s updated guidelines mandate that all crypto firms marketing their services to UK consumers must register with the FCA and adhere to relevant standards concerning risk disclosures and marketing practices.Regulatory compliance challengesWhile Crypto.com has managed to remain compliant, that’s not the case for all large and well-known crypto platforms. The FCA recently expanded its scrutiny of digital currency exchanges by adding Huobi and KuCoin to its list of unapproved and unregistered firms.The FCA alerted clients to the fact that these service providers were offering various crypto services in the UK without obtaining regulatory approval. This development follows a recent warning from the FCA, which highlighted several other crypto-focused companies.Binance’s compliance difficulties2023 has seen global crypto platform Binance struggle with regulatory compliance in various markets worldwide. In some jurisdictions where it has either decided to withdraw from the market or been asked to leave, the firm has taken the approach of still maintaining exposure to that market by establishing a partnership with a locally registered firm.In the UK, Binance has partnered with Rebuildingsociety.com, a peer-to-peer lending platform. However, its local partner has fallen foul of the UK's FCA. On Tuesday, the UK regulator issued a notice clarifying that Rebuildingsociety.com was not authorized to “approve the content of any financial promotion for a Qualifying Cryptoasset for communication by an unauthorized person.”Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit is another crypto business that has struggled with the FCA's new regulatory requirements. Last month the exchange denied reports that it was preparing to leave the UK market due to the new strict marketing rules. The following week the exchange confirmed that it would be leaving the UK market, ahead of the introduction of the new crypto marketing regulations.Crypto.com had received registration approval from the FCA in August 2022. At the time, CEO Kris Marsazalek stated:“We are committed to the UK market and we look forward to developing our platform and presence in the UK further by expanding our offering to customers, while continuing to work with regulators.”In June, the firm acquired a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license in its home market of Singapore from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Around the same timeframe, the firm received a minimum viable product (MVP) license from the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Feb 15, 2024

Japan’s FSA requests crypto transaction measures with implications for P2P trading

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA), the nation's primary financial regulator, has recently proposed a series of measures aimed at safeguarding users against "unlawful transfers" to cryptocurrency exchanges. This move, however, may pose significant challenges to the peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions market. Bolstering user protection measuresCiting findings from the National Police Agency, which highlight that damages resulting from specialized fraud involving unlawful money transfers are predominantly facilitated through cryptocurrency, the FSA has urged financial institutions to bolster user protection measures. The agency emphasized the importance of assessing risks associated with transfers to crypto-asset exchange service providers. In a request published on Wednesday directed towards Japanese banks, the FSA underscored the persistently high incidence of fraudulent transactions in the country, facilitated through crypto. To address this concern, the FSA and the National Police Agency have proposed various initiatives. One such initiative entails directing banks to enhance monitoring of unlawful transfers to cryptocurrency exchange service providers.Photo by Jayjayli on UnsplashPeer-to-peer (P2P) market implicationsHowever, another proposal from the regulator may have a profound impact on the P2P market. The FSA suggests halting transfers to cryptocurrency exchange service providers if the sender's name differs from the account name. This recommendation, explained in the Japanese version of the press release using the term "reject," implies the suspension of such transfers from both individual and corporate accounts. For users of P2P platforms, where transactions often involve different names between the sender's and receiver's fiat and crypto accounts, this directive could significantly disrupt the market. Rejecting transactions from an individual's bank account to another individual’s crypto wallet could undermine the functionality of P2P transactions. Positive crypto developmentsDespite this potential issue needing to be clarified and resolved and the East Asian nation not having a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in place, Japan is showing indications of gearing up for broader adoption. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) is preparing to pilot a Japanese central bank digital currency (CBDC) pegged to the Japanese yen.In June of last year, the country established a legal framework for stablecoins. Additionally, the FSA has proposed a legislative amendment to support the development of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) in Japan. The proposed amendment aims to designate potential DAO tokens as "Limited Company Type DAO Employee Rights Tokens," granting holders legal rights akin to regular limited liability company (LLC) members. Last December the Japanese government considered and later acted on revising crypto tax policy to exempt unrealized crypto gains from being taxed. This proposal was originally put forward by the FSA earlier in 2023. In another development, authorities in the city of Kochi signed an agreement on Feb. 7 to virtualize the city on the Start Lands metaverse application, with plans to welcome online tourists later this summer. Despite these most recent recommendations from the FSA potentially signaling a less crypto-friendly stance, the Japanese authorities have otherwise demonstrated that they’re working towards creating workable conditions for the development of crypto and Web3 within the country.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jul 09, 2025

Metaplanet aspires to acquisition of digital bank

The CEO of Japanese hotel operator turned Bitcoin treasury company, Metaplanet, has suggested that the firm may consider acquiring a digital bank in the future. Simon Gerovich, the firm’s CEO and a former Goldman Sachs banker, told the Financial Times that part of the second stage of its overall strategy may involve “acquiring a digital bank in Japan and providing digital banking services that are superior to the services which retail now is getting.”Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashBitcoin gold rushGerovich explained that phase one of Metaplanet’s plan involves participating in what he considers to be “a bitcoin gold rush.” He added: “We need to accumulate as much bitcoin as we can . . . to get to a point where we’ve reached escape velocity and it just makes it very difficult for others to catch up.” Other firms are jumping on the bandwagon, as within a very short timeframe, 140 companies around the world have adopted a Bitcoin treasury strategy. Metaplanet currently weighs in as the fifth-largest corporate holder of Bitcoin globally. Right now, the company holds 15,555 BTC. Its target is a holding of 210,000 BTC, which equates to around 1% of the total Bitcoin supply. Based on current pricing, such a holding would be worth in the region of $23 billion. Acquiring cash-generating businessesOnce the company has accomplished its Bitcoin accumulation goals, it plans to move on to phase two, acquiring cash-generating businesses while leveraging its Bitcoin holdings in order to do so. Using Bitcoin as collateral, Gerovich said that Metaplanet will “get cash that we can use to buy profitable businesses.”  While inroads are being made with regard to the acceptance of Bitcoin as a corporate reserve asset, it is earlier days still for its acceptance as collateral. Last month, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) in the United States, ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, key government-sponsored players in the American mortgage market, to explore the treatment of Bitcoin as eligible collateral for mortgages. Standard Chartered and crypto exchange OKX launched a pilot program earlier this year geared towards the use of crypto for collateral purposes. Gerovich talks in terms of Metaplanet’s phase two plan playing out at a time “when bitcoin, like securities or government bonds, can be deposited with banks and then they’ll provide very attractive financing against that asset.” The Metaplanet CEO stated that he expects the Bitcoin accumulation phase of the plan to play out over a period of between four and six years. The Tokyo-listed firm started accumulating Bitcoin in 2024. Some market participants are backing Metaplanet’s strategy with their own money. Global investment management firm Capital Group recently became Metaplanet’s second-largest investor. Bitcoin treasury criticsHowever, the emergence of Bitcoin treasury firms has also drawn quite a few detractors. Some critics point out that many of these companies have a negative operating income. Market analyst Caleb Franzen asserted that even after buying Bitcoin, they’re still junk companies. Others point out that too many firms have jumped on the Bitcoin treasury bandwagon, making the prospect no longer attractive. Fakhul Miah, managing director of GoMining Institutional, is also concerned about copycats. He told Cointelegraph that ”if these smaller firms crash, we could see a ripple effect that hurts Bitcoin’s image.”

news
Loading