Korea’s Upbit operator secures renewal amid influx of former regulatory officials

In a recent announcement on Facebook, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has raised alarm bells about a new form of cyber scam that exploits deep-fake technology. Deep-fake technologyThe Prime Minister highlighted the emergence of deceptive videos utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) to create false portrayals of him endorsing cryptocurrency scams. This development underscores the escalating sophistication of online scams and the deployment of advanced technology to mislead the public. Deep-fake technology has emerged as a powerful tool for scammers, enabling them to manipulate genuine footage to produce highly convincing yet entirely fabricated content. In the latest incident, a deep-fake video features Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong endorsing a nonexistent crypto investment platform purportedly associated with entrepreneur Elon Musk. This video, a manipulated version of an interview on CGTN, showcases the concerning level of realism achievable with deep-fake technology. The incident emphasizes the growing trend of utilizing AI in perpetrating scams. Prime Minister Lee underscored the deceptive nature of these videos, articulating the potential damage they could inflict by leading unsuspecting individuals to invest in fraudulent schemes. The Singaporean government maintains a vigilant stance on such scams, consistently urging citizens to exercise caution and verify information from official sources.Photo by Guo Xin Goh on UnsplashPrevious issuesThe exploitation of public figures in financial scams is not a new phenomenon. Prime Minister Lee has been a recurrent target of such scams, dating back to 2018. At that time, the government issued public warnings about Bitcoin investment scams falsely claiming the Prime Minister’s endorsement. More recently, in July, another fake video featuring Lee Hsien Loong surfaced, prompting renewed public warnings. In 2021, the Prime Minister’s name and photograph were used without his consent in an effort to sell cryptocurrency. The data was taken from his X (formerly Twitter) profile. At the time, Lee wrote:“The site’s creators are anonymous, but I have sent an open tweet out to ask that my name and photo be removed from the site immediately, as I have nothing to do with the platform. I urge everyone to remain vigilant when dealing with cryptocurrency platforms.” That was a much less sophisticated identity-related scam. More often than not, scammers and fraudsters tend to be early adopters of technology. That’s proving to be the case with the use of deep-fakes in this instance. A need for cautionAs he did in 2021, Prime Minister Lee has urged the public to exercise caution in light of this more recent incident. He advises against responding to scams promising guaranteed investment returns or giveaways. There’s every sign that the Prime Minister’s warning is warranted. In September it emerged that six Singaporeans lost more than $100,000 when a scammer tricked them into buying tokens on a cryptocurrency trading platform. More recently, five Americans were conned out of $10 million in a scam that involved a spoofed domain of the former Singapore International Monetary Exchange (Simex). This call for public vigilance is part of a broader government effort to address the surge in cyber fraud. These repeated incidents underscore the challenges posed by digital technologies in spreading misinformation and financial fraud.   

Former PBOC Governor: CBDC Development Must Focus on SecurityZhou Xiaochuan, a former governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), has issued a call for China to prioritize security and vigilance against potential misuse as it advances the development of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), known as the e-CNY.Photo by FLY:D on UnsplashSafeguarding the CBDC ecosystemXiaochuan made this appeal during the Digital Finance Forum, which was held in Beijing last week. He emphasized the necessity of safeguarding the CBDC ecosystem.The PBOC has been actively engaged in trials and innovations related to the e-CNY, even rolling out a pilot application in January 2022. The digital yuan’s journey, however, comes with significant responsibilities, particularly in terms of security and prevention of misuse.Thwarting potential abuseZhou acknowledged that in the realm of finance, security has always been a paramount concern, and this sentiment couldn’t be more accurate when applied to the realm of digital currency. He stressed that, as technology costs continue to decline and systems become more user-friendly, the risks associated with misuse also decrease. In this context, it becomes imperative for China to adopt stringent security measures and robust regulatory frameworks to thwart any potential abuse.Zhou underscored the illicit utilization of cryptocurrencies and stablecoins in facilitating various activities, including arms trafficking and drug trade. He pointed out that addressing these issues necessitates a concentrated effort, making it clear that a proactive approach to prevention is essential.The development of the e-CNY has seen impressive progress, with pilot projects initiated in 2019 and later expanded to 26 locations across 17 provincial-level cities and regions, including major metropolitan areas like Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Suzhou.Last month another official from the PBOC spoke to the need to make the e-CNY accessible in all retail payment scenarios within China at a trade forum in Beijing. Digital yuan use is also being broadened to facilitate its availability in the special Chinese administrative area of Hong Kong.Proposing two-tier systemZhou advocated for a two-tier system in the operation of e-CNY, a structure already in place. The People’s Bank of China presides over the first tier, responsible for issuance and regulation, while the second tier comprises commercial institutions such as commercial banks, internet platforms, and telecommunications operators.This dual-layered design promotes dynamic evolution within the digital currency landscape, enhancing service quality and fostering innovation through healthy competition. Zhou stressed the importance of exploring cross-border transactions, an area that entails both technological advancements and policy orientation.Hong Kong has actively embraced e-CNY for cross-border payments, advancing into the second phase of technical testing and preparing to incorporate it into its predominantly local payment system.On a related note, Lu Lei, the deputy administrator of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), highlighted the programmable features of CBDCs as tools for enhancing monetary policy effectiveness.While current CBDCs are positioned as M0 currencies, strictly currency in circulation plus commercial bank reserve balances, he proposed that central banks could evolve them into M2 currencies. M2 is a measure of money supply that incorporates checking deposits and other forms of deposits that are readily convertible to cash, alongside cash itself.

Polymarket activity under scrutiny in Taiwan due to election contractsTaiwanese law enforcement is currently delving into the activities of online influencers and community members promoting Polymarket contracts related to the upcoming presidential election which is due to be held on Jan. 13.Polymarket is a New York-based Ethereum-centric prediction market. The platform runs on the Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution network Polygon. The project invites platform users to bet on the outcomes of a broad spectrum of events, ranging from politics to entertainment.Users deposit USDC stablecoin, choose an event to bet on and purchase “outcome shares” through USDC. The user has the ability to trade those shares anytime before the resolution of the contract.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashPossible election law violationsThe Taiwanese investigation came to light in a report by Taiwan-based crypto publication BlockTempo, which was published last week. The investigation comes as concerns arose about potential violations of Taiwan’s Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, which explicitly prohibits gambling on election outcomes.Multiple influencers and crypto community members have reportedly been subpoenaed for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, allowing users to place bets on the January election. At present, the betting pool for the election holds over $300,000, with a market prediction favoring the Democratic Progressive Party’s Lai Ching-te, also known as William Lai, with a 78% chance of winning.However, the legality of such betting activities is in question under Article 88–1 of Taiwan’s election law. It stipulates that anyone gambling on the outcome of an election or recall in a public place or a place open to the public may face imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine of up to NT$100,000 ($3,196.85).Sherman Lin, an attorney at Taipei-based Lin & Partners, emphasized the seriousness with which law enforcement views gambling activities related to presidential elections in Taiwan. He explained that broad legal interpretations under the Presidential Election and Recall Act have led to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators targeting Taiwanese gamblers. Lin stated:“Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are vigilant in investigating any gambling activities related to presidential elections.”“Broad legal interpretations have been applied to gambling crimes under the Presidential Election and Recall Act, leading to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators in Taiwan targeting Taiwanese gamblers,” he added.Prohibited in United StatesComparing the situation to the United States, where gambling on election outcomes is illegal in most states, Lin noted that enforcing such regulations often falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket’s Terms of Use explicitly prohibit usage by U.S. persons.Despite potential legal consequences for gambling activities in Taiwan, including participation, promotion and platform hosting for betting pools like Polymarket, Lin pointed out that enforcing actions against overseas entities poses jurisdictional challenges. Taiwan’s legal reach is primarily limited to domestic actors, creating complexities in addressing decentralized platforms like Polymarket.Lin suggested that law enforcement may focus on online influencers who promoted the Polymarket contract, as seen in previous cases involving the collapse of the unlicensed crypto exchange JPEX in Hong Kong.Moreover, while there are legal precedents for pursuing centralized entities organizing election gambling, Lin highlighted that no established legal precedent in Taiwan currently exists for decentralized platforms organizing election betting.