Korean retail traders flee crypto as stocks rally amid regulatory debate

Zipmex proposes creditor repayments of 3 cents on the dollarBeleaguered Singaporean crypto exchange Zipmex has unveiled a restructuring proposal aimed at repaying creditors. According to a report published by Bloomberg on Wednesday, the initial offer stands at 3.35 cents for every dollar of the creditors’ claims.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashRestructuring challengesThis restructuring proposal unfolds against the backdrop of a challenging period for Zipmex, triggered by the aftermath of last year’s crypto price downturn. The crypto exchange, which operates in Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and Singapore, is currently undergoing a court-supervised restructuring process based in Singapore.In its efforts to restructure the business, Zipmex is grappling with a debt of $97.1 million. That total debt level is contingent upon the eventual recovery of assets. Bloomberg cited sources familiar with the matter, suggesting that depending on the success of these recovery efforts, the repayment figure could potentially surge to 29.35 cents per dollar.Creditor dissatisfactionHowever, not all major creditors are on board with Zipmex’s proposed plan. Expressing reservations, they are pushing for an independent review to scrutinize recent changes in the company’s assets and liabilities, as outlined in an Oct. 4 court document. This external examination is deemed crucial to ensuring transparency and fairness throughout the restructuring process.In response to these developments, Marcus Lim, the Group Chief Executive Officer of Zipmex, refrained from providing detailed comments due to the confidentiality of the ongoing arrangement. While acknowledging inaccuracies in information sourced from external outlets, he chose not to elaborate on them further.Investor deal failureA previous attempt to sell Zipmex to V Ventures, a subsidiary of Thoresen Thai Agencies, fell through. To add to the struggling company’s woes, it emerged earlier this week that Thailand’s securities regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently instructed Zipmex to halt operations in the country due to insufficient net capital.The company had been fined 11 million baht ($315,000) by the SEC earlier this year. The SEC cited the co-mingling of corporate and customer funds as one regulatory breach. Furthermore, the Thai regulator claimed that between May and July 2022, Zipmex “did not have in place a system to effectively prevent conflicts of interest in such matters and the business operation does not have an adequate risk control system.”In response to this recent regulatory directive, Zipmex Limited issued a statement to its customers, expressing its commitment to ensuring proper and compliant business operations in line with the criteria set by the Thai SEC. Consequently, the temporary suspension of digital asset trading and deposit of all types was deemed necessary.The intricacies of Zipmex’s financial restructuring will be closely watched by market observers, especially considering the volatility in the crypto market and the regulatory challenges faced by the company in multiple jurisdictions. The success of the proposed repayment plan, contingent upon asset recovery, remains uncertain, leaving creditors and industry stakeholders on edge.As Zipmex grapples with these multifaceted challenges, its future trajectory hinges on navigating both the demands of the bankruptcy process alongside regulatory requirements.

Bybit Denies Plans to Leave UK MarketReporting related to Dubai-based crypto exchange Bybit had suggested in recent days that the firm was leaving the UK market. However, the company has since responded to state that it has strongly reaffirmed its commitment to the UK market and its dedication to collaborate with regulators to find mutually agreeable solutions.Photo by Marcin Nowak on UnsplashCompany clarificationThat speculation had arisen in the first place on the basis of difficulties the business may experience as a consequence of the upcoming implementation of new strict marketing rules for crypto firms in the UK. Taking to social media on Thursday, the company stated:”At Bybit, we consider the UK to be a highly important market for the advancement of crypto and blockchain technologies. Our commitment to this market is unwavering, and we intend to maintain our presence in the UK for the long term. Meanwhile, we are dedicated to working collaboratively with regulators upon the new law to ensure the responsible and secure development of the industry.”The reports published earlier in the week had fueled speculation that Bybit might exit the UK market, along with other jurisdictions characterized by rigorous crypto regulations. The concerns primarily centered around the UK’s recently introduced financial promotion rules, designed to bolster customer protection and enhance understanding of crypto investments.Ben Zhou, Co-Founder and CEO of Bybit, commented on the situation, underscoring the exchange’s unwavering commitment to regulatory compliance. Zhou confirmed that ongoing discussions with UK regulators aimed to find mutually beneficial solutions, aligning the interests of all stakeholders involved. He emphasized Bybit’s commitment to keeping its community well-informed about the progress of these discussions.Regulatory changesThe recent move by Bybit is in direct response to regulatory changes introduced by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in June. These changes were implemented to improve transparency and enhance customer protection within the crypto sector, with a particular focus on ensuring that UK customers have a clear understanding of the risks associated with crypto investments. The FCA also outlined various pathways for asset promotion, including those involving FCA-authorized personnel or crypto companies registered with the FCA.Exchanges have been very much under the cosh in 2023 when it comes to regulatory pressures. Bybit, accompanied by MEXC Global, Bitforex, and Bitget, were all issued with a warning by the Japanese regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), in April on the basis that the exchanges were running unregistered crypto asset exchange business operations within Japan. In May Binance left the Canadian market.In the months that followed, the leading global crypto exchange was forced out of markets in Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, and Cyprus due to regulatory pushback. In May Seychelles-based Huobi was ordered to cease its business offering in Malaysia by the local regulator.Moving forwardDespite these setbacks, Bybit has been making efforts to move the business forward. In May it obtained approval from the authorities in Kazakhstan to offer its services within the country. Some weeks prior, it announced that it had chosen Dubai as the global exchange’s headquarters.The firm also introduced TradeGPT recently, an AI-powered educational tool designed to enrich traders’ engagement with the crypto market.

In the ongoing legal tussle over cryptocurrency assets, the High Court of Singapore has rejected a plea by the bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Arthur Cheong, the founder of Web3 investment firm DeFiance Capital. This ruling represents a pivotal moment in the $140 million dispute, shedding light on the ownership and control of assets, while building upon DeFiance Capital’s previous success back in August of last year in having its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore endorsed.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashRecognizing assets held in trustOn Jan. 26, a Singapore judge ruled against 3AC's request to have Cheong’s claim thrown out, stating that DeFiance Capital has adequately demonstrated the existence of a Singapore-based trust safeguarding its assets. This revelation could potentially shield DeFiance Capital from 3AC's liquidators, marking a crucial juncture in the legal battle. The dispute traces back to an agreement where Cheong was set to launch an independent fund on the 3AC Group platform, with ownership and control vested in DeFiance Capital. This fund, leveraging 3AC's infrastructure, faced disagreements over the transfer of certain assets, whose undisclosed value became a point of contention in court documents. The downfall of the $10 billion 3AC hedge fund, responsible for the "Super Cycle" thesis predicting perpetual crypto price increases, had widespread repercussions in the crypto industry. DeFiance Capital bore the brunt of this collapse and the recent court ruling brings the firm closer to resolving the aftermath favorably. The ongoing argument holds strategic importance for DeFiance Capital, as the investment firm challenges any legal obligation for its shareholders to compensate 3AC creditors. "Wassielawyer," a pseudonymous restructuring attorney advising DeFiance Capital's founder Arthur Cheong, highlighted the significance of this stance on social media. Positive signThe judge's acknowledgment of the trust, while not conclusive, is viewed as a positive sign for DeFiance Capital. In a series of posts on the X social media platform, Wassielawyer outlined on Thursday that he sees this as "much-needed vindication" for Cheong, signaling a potential turn in favor of the investment firm. Wassielawyer emphasized that DeFiance Capital merely utilized 3AC's legal structure, without commingling operations. This distinction becomes crucial as carefully drafted legal documents form the basis for 3AC creditors attempting to seize DeFiance Capital funds. The restructuring professional added:”[DeFiance Capital] have on the basis of the substantive facts, ran an argument that the assets of DCs should not be used to pay back 3AC creditors. This eventuality would be manifestly unjust, enriching the creditors of 3AC at the expense of innocent DC investors.” Once a major player in the crypto hedge fund arena, 3AC's demise resulted from exposure to Terra, staked Ethereum and Grayscale's Bitcoin Trust. The bankruptcy filing on June 30, 2022, marked the end of an era for the once-mighty fund. Established in 2020, DeFiance Capital specializes in crypto investments, focusing on decentralized finance and GameFi. It has supported projects such as dYdX, Aave and Lido. This decision establishes a precedent for similar cases, particularly in jurisdictions like Singapore, emerging as pivotal hubs for cryptocurrency and blockchain-related activities. The outcome holds implications for how such legal disputes will be handled in the future, shaping the landscape of crypto-related legal proceedings.