Top

Korea’s crypto market faces tax fight, trading slump, and USDT laundering crackdown

Markets·May 26, 2026, 2:22 AM

South Korea’s cryptocurrency industry is entering a politically sensitive stretch as investors, exchanges, and regulators confront a mix of tax uncertainty, shrinking trading volumes, and growing scrutiny over crypto-linked money laundering.

 

At the center of the debate is the government’s plan to begin taxing crypto gains in January 2027 after three previous delays. Under the current plan, annual crypto profits exceeding 2.5 million won ($1,650) would be taxed at 22%. The framework was first formalized in 2020, but implementation was postponed several times amid concerns over investor protection, market readiness, and political resistance.

 

According to the Hankyoreh newspaper, opposition has intensified after lawmakers scrapped the country’s financial investment income tax, which would have applied to gains from stocks and funds. Critics argue that taxing crypto while most retail stock investors remain exempt from capital gains tax creates an uneven playing field.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/4740ea2737666044e23bf2f70d8f13ee.webp
Photo by Tara Winstead on Pexels

Crypto tax petition advances

A public petition calling for the abolition of crypto taxation has already gathered more than 54,000 signatures, clearing the threshold for review by a National Assembly committee. The petitioner argued that the issue needs a full reconsideration, including the possibility of scrapping the tax altogether.

 

The opposition People Power Party has also proposed legislation to abolish the crypto tax, saying it would be inconsistent to impose a separate income tax on crypto assets after eliminating the broader financial investment tax. The ruling Democratic Party, meanwhile, is expected to take up the issue more seriously after the June 3 local elections.

 

The government says there has been no change to its position and that crypto taxation is still scheduled to begin next January. But it has ruled out, at least for now, any renewed discussion on the financial investment income tax, fueling claims that the tax system is treating crypto investors unfairly.

 

The tax dispute comes as Korean crypto exchanges are already grappling with a steep drop in trading activity. Retail investors have been shifting money into equities, drawn by a strong KOSPI rally and momentum in chip and AI stocks, draining activity from the crypto market.

 

According to CoinMarketCap data cited by ETNews, Upbit’s average daily trading volume in the first quarter stood at about $1.55 billion, down 38.8% from the second half of last year. Bithumb’s first-quarter daily average was roughly $647 million, a 44.4% drop over the same period.

 

The decline continued after the first quarter. From Jan. 1 to May 20, Upbit’s average daily volume fell to about $1.38 billion, down 45.5% from the second half of 2025. Bithumb’s average dropped to about $600 million, widening its decline to 48.5%.

That slowdown has hit earnings. Dunamu, the operator of Upbit, reported first-quarter operating revenue of 234.6 billion won and operating profit of 88 billion won ($58 million), down 55% and 78% year-on-year, respectively. Bithumb posted revenue of 82.5 billion won ($55 million) and operating profit of just 2.9 billion won ($2 million), down 57.6% and 95.8%, while swinging to a net loss of 86.9 billion won ($58 million).

 

The structural problem is that Korean exchanges still rely heavily on retail spot-trading fees. Unlike major global exchanges, domestic platforms have limited room to expand into derivatives, institutional custody, stablecoin payments, and other higher-margin businesses. Rising compliance costs, including customer verification and anti-money-laundering (AML) upgrades, are adding to the burden.

 

USDT dominates $77M laundering case

Separately, Korean police said they apprehended 149 suspects accused of laundering about 117 billion won ($77.5 million) through a network linked to a China-based laundering group in Shenzhen, according to the Seoul Economic Daily. Seven suspects were formally arrested, and police said all suspects identified so far are Korean nationals.

 

USDT accounted for 72% of the funds moved, while bogus gift-card operations made up 19% and ordinary bank transfers 9%. Authorities said the scheme used accounts opened under other people’s names and overseas crypto exchanges to make the funds harder to trace.

 

Meanwhile, sentiment among Korean crypto investors remains mixed but not entirely bearish. A weekly survey by CoinNess and Kratos found that 34.1% of respondents expected Bitcoin to rise or surge this week, while 36.3% expected sideways movement and 29.6% expected a decline.

 

Asked whether the crypto market could recover this year, 38.5% said the current downturn looked like a healthy correction with room for a rebound, while 29.7% said the market would not only recover but also set new highs. Combined, 68.2% of respondents expected some form of recovery this year.

 

Still, pessimism remains. Another 17.7% said the crypto market had peaked and was unlikely to rebound, while 14.1% said they had already left the market and no longer had expectations.

 

At the time of publication, Bitcoin (BTC) was trading at $76,677.43, up 0.1% over the past week, reflecting a largely range-bound market.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 04, 2025

MAS sets deadline for unlicensed crypto firms serving clients overseas from Singapore

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the city-state’s central bank and primary financial regulator, has set a deadline of June 30 for unlicensed digital token service providers (DTSPs) working out of Singapore to cease offering their services to clients in overseas markets.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashResponding to feedbackThe deadline emerged by way of a process MAS has followed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSM Act). Last October, the regulator invited feedback from stakeholders related to the authority’s approach to the regulation of DTSPs. MAS published its response to that feedback on May 30.  It stated:”DTSPs which are subject to a licensing requirement under section 137 of the FSM Act must suspend or cease carrying on a business of providing DT services outside Singapore by 30 June 2025.” It added that it was not including any transitional arrangement for DTSPs despite MAS receiving such a suggestion from a number of feedback respondents. Instead, unlicensed DTSPs will need to abide by the June 30 deadline and have acquired a license by then or cease unlicensed activity.The regulator defines DTSPs as individuals, partnerships or Singapore corporations operating from a place of business in Singapore, including those formed or incorporated in Singapore who offer digital token services outside Singapore. Those found in breach of the regulation could face up to three years in prison and fines of up to S$250,000 ($195,000). Companies who have already obtained licensing or those exempted by way of the Securities and Futures Act, Payment Services Act and the Financial Advisers Act are free to continue trading. Challenging licensing requirementsThose who wish to become compliant will have to satisfy some challenging requirements. For those granted a license, an annual license fee of S$10,000 ($7,780) applies. Small-scale DTSPs need to satisfy a $150,000 ($116,670) ongoing capital requirement, while larger, well-established DTSPs must comply with a S$250,000 ($195,000) capital requirement. Additionally, MAS has put in place competency requirements related to a DTSP's CEO, directors, partners and managers. Hagen Rooke, a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, outlined on LinkedIn that while it's possible for unlicensed operators to obtain licensing, it will be very difficult to get a license. In its feedback response document, the regulator stated: “MAS will approach the licensing of DTSPs in a prudent and cautious manner and there will be extremely limited circumstances under which MAS will consider granting an applicant a licence under section 138 of the FSM Act.” Rooke advised crypto companies that may be affected to act swiftly in order to derisk through an operational restructuring or removing the businesses' Singapore touchpoints. He suggested that firms need to consider if it has customers outside of Singapore or front-office functions located outside of the city-state to determine if they could be affected by this regulatory measure. A number of Asian countries have moved to take action against unlicensed foreign firms that have engaged with local investors, with Thailand becoming the latest country to do so recently. However, the Singaporean authorities have approached the issue from the opposite perspective, citing the potential reputational risk that unlicensed DTSPs pose for Singapore.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Mar 15, 2024

India’s SEBI head wants instant settlement to counter crypto threat

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is set to introduce a same-day settlement cycle starting March 28, making India only the second country, following China, to adopt such a system. This move comes amidst growing competition from the cryptocurrency sector, with SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch emphasizing the need for instant settlement and tokenization to remain competitive.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashEvolving market dynamicsBuch has unveiled plans aimed at enhancing the efficiency of India's capital markets through faster settlement processes. During a recent press conference, she highlighted the significance of adapting to evolving market dynamics. Buch stated:“If our well-regulated market cannot compete with the crypto world and cannot say we also offer you tokenization and instantaneous settlement over the medium term, I won’t even say long term, you should expect investors to move." The SEBI chairperson articulated that we live in a time where the current generation demands instant delivery of services. It’s with that in mind Buch believes that crypto is a threat to traditional financial markets. She stated:"Everybody wants instant everything. Right? So why should anyone believe that tomorrow if an alternative is available with instant settlement tokenization and they say the regulated market doesn’t offer it, you should expect people to move.” With a focus on meeting investor expectations for instant transactions, SEBI aims to bridge the gap between traditional capital markets and the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. Faster settlement cyclesIndia has been at the forefront of adopting faster settlement cycles, having transitioned to a one-day settlement (T+1) model between 2021 and January 2023. The optional same-day settlement, scheduled to commence later this month, represents another step towards enhancing market efficiency. However, Buch cautioned that further delays in embracing instant settlement could lead to a significant portion of the market shifting towards cryptocurrencies. The move towards faster settlement has been met with enthusiasm from some market participants. Indian business news publication Mint reported the comments of Shauryam Gupta, CEO of web trading platform Rupeezy, on the subject. Gupta stated: “The shift to instantaneous settlement is a substantial milestone, streamlining operations and cutting down on risk. The potential advantages of reducing counterparty risk and boosting liquidity signal positive growth for the sector.” However, others, particularly brokers, have expressed reservations. Brokers, who hold client funds and earn interest on balances, stand to see their interest earnings decrease with shorter settlement times. Nonetheless, SEBI remains steadfast in its commitment to modernizing India's capital markets to remain globally competitive. The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies in India has been predominantly shaped by the nation's finance ministry and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). While the RBI has been vocal in its opposition to cryptocurrencies, advocating for central bank digital currencies instead, SEBI's recent initiatives underscore its willingness to adapt to changing market dynamics. SEBI's efforts reflect a broader trend of regulatory bodies worldwide seeking to strike a balance between innovation and investor protection in an increasingly digital financial landscape. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Apr 19, 2023

Korean Web3 Enabler Participates in NFT.NYC 2023

Korean Web3 Enabler Participates in NFT.NYC 2023The Moon Labs, a Korean Web3 enabler, participated in NFT.NYC 2023 that took place in New York from April 12 to 14, according to Maeil Business Newspaper.Photo by Luca Bravo on UnsplashCollaborations with SuperchiefIn collaboration with New York-based underground artist supporter Superchief Gallery NFT, the Moon Labs advertised its decentralized autonomous organization project LeisureMetaverse on Time Square’s digital screen. Previously, the Moon Labs co-hosted NFT Korea Festival 2023 with Superchief Gallery NFT.A2E incentivization modelThe Moon Labs boasts the web 3.0 community LM Nova, the NFT marketplace PlayNomm, and its native wallet, LM Wallet. In particular, LM Nova has adopted an act-to-earn (A2E) model to provide incentives to users.About NFT.NYCNFT.NYC, one of the world’s largest NFT events, has been held annually since 2018. The show attracted not only crypto entrepreneurs but also artists, investors, and influencers. More than 500 brands took part in the event, and over 1,500 speakers delivered their talks at the conference.The Moon Labs CEO Moon Seong-eok said the company will seize this opportunity to expand global partnerships and further commit to the growth of the NFT ecosystem.

news
Loading