Korea’s Crypto Exchange Group Hires Data Security Professor as Advisor

Local crypto firms in Hong Kong are understood to be in “active” talks with the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), with a view towards bringing about the integration of staking within crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) products. Haiyang Ru, chief risk officer of HashKey Group, a leading Hong Kong-headquartered digital asset financial services firm, told The Block that the Chinese autonomous territory may shortly see the introduction of staking services relative to crypto derivatives trading products and crypto ETFs. He stated: "We are actively discussing with the SFC the introduction of ETF staking and tokenized money market funds, as well as launching an 'Earn' feature alongside spot trading."Photo by tommao wang on UnsplashFocus on staking in 2025HashKey is one of a number of well-known digital asset firms that is in regular contact with the regulator. Other firms are also paying attention to developments. Alessio Quaglini, co-founder and CEO of Hex Trust, a Hong Kong-based firm that offers regulated institutional digital asset custody and staking services, believes that staking will garner greater attention in 2025. He stated: “Institutions that move into crypto custody will naturally seek yield-generating opportunities for their clients."  OSL, one of the first entities alongside HashKey to be awarded digital assets-related licensing in Hong Kong, has also identified rising customer demand for yield-generating products in the crypto space within the Chinese autonomous territory.  Global competitionThe authorities in Hong Kong are likely to be watching developments overseas also. ETH ETFs in the United States have reeled in $3 billion in capital inflows without staking. Since the launch of these products, many industry commentators have suggested that in the event that staking is approved, big institutions, particularly pension funds and wealth managers, are going to be attracted to the passive yields on these ETFs.  Traditional finance (TradFi) loves yield, and in the case of Ether ETFs that include staking, an annual percentage yield (APY) of up to 5% should be possible. Last month, an S&P Global report suggested that there was growing interest from institutional investors with regard to crypto staking opportunities.  Cryptocurrency ETF issuer 21Shares has applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S. to include staking within its ETH ETF product. A similar application has been made by crypto asset manager Grayscale relative to its ETH ETF offering. With that activity ongoing in the U.S. and inter-jurisdictional competition in terms of digital asset growth opportunities, it’s likely that Hong Kong will be keen to enable this market offering. Staking ‘unparalleled’ in TradFi markets Earlier this week, the SFC introduced a new roadmap geared towards strengthening the digital assets sector in Hong Kong. One of the initiatives itemized is the enabling of crypto staking.  The explanatory document published by the regulator states that it is examining the introduction of staking with safeguards in respect to digital asset custody, liquidity risks and “ensuring that the operational processes for staking are transparent.” The SFC described crypto staking as a yield generation opportunity that is unparalleled in TradFi markets.

In a move announced on Friday, OKX, the Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange, declared its decision to delist 20 trading pairs by Jan. 5, triggering a notable price fall for major privacy coins such as Monero, Dash and ZCash. The exchange cited that the affected pairs did not align with its listing criteria, though specific details were not disclosed.Photo by Khara Woods on UnsplashPrivacy coin delisting trendWhile OKX did not explicitly articulate the rationale behind this move, industry observers are speculating that it could be part of the exchange’s broader efforts to comply with evolving regulatory measures. Privacy coins have increasingly drawn regulatory scrutiny due to concerns about potential illicit activities within the crypto space. Earlier in the year, Binance had also announced the delisting of several privacy coins to ensure compliance with local laws and regulations. The broader context of regulatory pressures on privacy-focused cryptocurrencies seems to be impacting major exchanges’ decisions. In 2022, Huobi cited regulatory pressures when it took the decision to delist Monero and other privacy coins. Kraken was further ahead of the curve still, delisting Monero for UK customers in November 2021. Downward price actionFollowing OKX’s announcement on Friday, the prices of privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, notably Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), experienced a decline. The entire sector of “privacy cryptos” has witnessed a 7.1% decrease in overall market capitalization, according to an index of such coins compiled by Malaysian crypto indexing firm CoinGecko. During this period, Monero and Zcash have seen unit price declines of 4.5% and 10.7%, respectively. Other tokens set for delisting, including Dash, Powerpool and Horizen, have recorded declines of up to 14%. OKX has provided guidance to users, advising them to cancel orders related to the affected trading pairs before the delisting date to avoid automatic cancellation, a process that may take 1–3 working days. Concurrently, the exchange has halted deposits for the impacted cryptocurrencies and plans to cease withdrawals by Mar. 5, 2024, affording holders sufficient time to withdraw their assets. However, once the delisting is complete, trading these digital assets on OKX will become impossible. Interestingly, certain privacy coins like MINA continue to be listed on the exchange, experiencing a 7.5% increase following the delisting announcement. It’s crucial to note that OKX’s delisting is not exclusive to privacy tokens, as it also includes other trading pairs associated with digital assets such as Kusama, Flow, Kyber Network and Aragon. The fight for privacySome crypto community members have voiced their concerns on social media, with many fearing that the innovation may be ‘captured’ by the various state authorities over time. However, ex-Monero developer Ricardo Spagni (AKA “Fluffypony”) was nonchalant about the whole thing, judging by his comments. In a post on social media platform X, he wrote: ”Monero users and contributors literally couldn’t care less about delistings at this point.” As the regulatory landscape evolves, cryptocurrency exchanges are navigating these challenges, impacting the availability and value of specific tokens on their platforms. Investors and privacy advocates alike will be closely watching how such regulatory compliance measures continue to shape the crypto market and crypto use.  

The Asia Web3 Alliance Japan, an agency that regards itself as a bridge between the Web3 ecosystem in Asia and Japan’s broader business sector, has reached out to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States with a view towards establishing a strategic collaboration.Photo by Clement Souchet on UnsplashFocus on Web3 regulatory innovation & tokenizationThe President of the organization, Hinza Asif, wrote to SEC Crypto Task Force Chairperson and SEC Commissioner, Hester Peirce, on the subject, on March 25. The letter, subsequently published by the SEC, sets out a proposal that centers on a strategic U.S.-Japan partnership relative to Web3 regulatory innovation and tokenization. The Japanese agency, which has set out cross-border synergy as one of its objectives, calls for collaboration between Japan’s Financial Services Agency, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Bank of Japan with the U.S. regulator. The Alliance proposes that the goal of that partnership would be the establishment of regulatory clarity in respect of the Web3 sector, together with the fostering of interoperability between a developing Web3 ecosystem in the U.S. and the one that’s developing in Japan. Token classification frameworkDelving deeper into proposal specifics, Asif sets out the formation of a harmonized token classification framework as a key objective. The proposal suggests that a distinction needs to be made between tokenized securities, utility tokens and non-security digital assets.  The alliance believes that right now, token classification is unclear, with projects struggling to understand what category their token falls within from a regulatory perspective. There’s a lack of token offering frameworks. While it sees that further work is required, the Asia Web3 Alliance Japan is encouraged by progress made by the SEC’s Crypto Task Force in identifying security categories. With this cross-border collaboration, the Japanese crypto advocacy group believes that there is an opportunity to achieve regulatory interoperability on an international basis. That would facilitate compliant cross-border token issuance. On that basis, the alliance suggests that standards be developed such that regulatory consistency is achieved internationally when it comes to items such as digital asset trading, custody and token issuance. The proposal sets out a need for reciprocal disclosure requirements between the two jurisdictions where cross-border token issuance is concerned. It advocates for mutual recognition of what it terms “compliant tokenized offerings.” Bringing safe harbor to JapanAnother focus area contained within the proposal is the suggestion of a need to implement a safe harbor approach in Japan for early-stage token projects in line with what has been put forward in the U.S. Peirce first put forward a token safe harbor proposal in the U.S. in 2020. It sets out to provide exemptions over a defined initial period for certain token issuances. The idea behind it is to enable these early-stage projects to innovate and mature without getting bogged down in a regulatory quagmire. The establishment of a U.S.-Japan Web3 regulatory roundtable is another strand contained within the proposal. This would provide a mechanism for ongoing dialogue between stakeholders such as regulators, industry leaders and legal experts.