CoinDCX Expands Okto Wallet’s Global Reach with Transak Integration

Korean Financial Authority Grants This Year’s First VASP Approval to Infinite BlockThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division operating under the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), has recently granted approval to Infinite Block, a blockchain fintech company, to function as a virtual asset service provider (VASP), as reported by the local news outlet Business Watch.37 registered VASPs in KoreaInfinite Block is the first entity to secure such approval from the national financial regulatory authority this year. This development takes the roster of registered VASPs in Korea to a total of 37.When submitting its application in May, Infinite Block declared that its business is tailored for transferring, storing, and managing virtual assets. Its core operational domain centers around virtual asset custody services.Custodian service for institutional investorsFounded last year by Jung Gu-tae, who previously served as a banker at NongHyup Bank and held a C-level position at digital asset custodian Cardo, Infinite Block leverages his extensive experience in banking and virtual assets. Building on this industry insight, Infinite Block is about to introduce Karbon Custody, a specialized service targeting institutional investors.Furthermore, Infinite Block raised about 2 billion KRW ($1.5 million) last year from renowned financial institutions including Daegu Bank, SK Securities, and Infobank. However, the company did incur an operating loss exceeding 200 million KRW due to its nascent stage and the absence of revenue streams.This accomplishment of Infinite Block is noteworthy in light of the decline observed in new VASP filings. While 2021 saw approximately 30 companies applying for VASP approval, the numbers dwindled to merely two new applications last year, followed by only one so far this year.

Hong Kong Adapts Crypto Regulations to Broaden Market AccessHong Kong’s financial regulator has taken a further regulatory step in its evolving stance on cryptocurrency trading, widening the scope of retail access to digital assets through intermediaries.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashResponding to growing demandThe move follows a surge in interest in spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and recent investigations into the unlicensed operations of the JPEX exchange. In a circular published by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on Friday, the regulator explained that the policy shift was prompted by changing market dynamics and growing inquiries from the industry.The new guidelines aim to extend access to a broader clientele and facilitate the direct deposit and withdrawal of virtual assets through intermediaries, all while maintaining stringent safeguards. The circular states:”The policy is updated in light of the latest market developments and enquiries from the industry seeking to further expand retail access through intermediaries and to allow investors to directly deposit and withdraw virtual assets to/from intermediaries with appropriate safeguards.”Cautionary notesDespite this welcome expansion, there are a couple of cautionary notes included within the circular. Hong Kong remains circumspect about overseas virtual asset (VA) products, deeming them “complex” and, as a result, riskier. The circular emphasizes that “VA-related products considered complex should only be offered to professional investors.” For instance, an overseas VA non-derivative ETF is likely to fall into this category.The other condition pertains to potential clients, who will be required to undergo a one-off test to assess their knowledge of investing and ensure they possess the financial wherewithal to manage the risks associated with virtual asset trading. Furthermore, intermediaries must furnish clients with comprehensive risk disclosure statements.The regulator also places an onus on the intermediary to set a limit for each retail client, to ensure that a retail client’s exposure to virtual assets is reasonable. The circular outlines that deposit and withdrawal of client funds should only happen through the use of segregated funding accounts on an SFC-licensed platform.Crypto sector aspirationsThis shift in regulation underscores Hong Kong’s ongoing aspirations to solidify its position as a hub for virtual assets. The territory embarked on a new regulatory regime in June, enabling applications for crypto trading platform licenses. By August, the first batch of licenses was granted, allowing exchanges to cater to retail customers. This marked a notable turnaround from Hong Kong’s prior 18 months of skepticism and hostility toward the cryptocurrency sector.The timing of these regulatory changes coincides with surging interest in spot Bitcoin ETFs, with JPMorgan even suggesting that approval in the US could materialize within months. This shift in regulatory perspective in Hong Kong also follows the investigation and accusations made against the JPEX exchange for conducting unlicensed operations, leading to arrests and the promise to disclose details of licensed applicants. The JPEX scandal has also dampened public confidence in crypto in Hong Kong more recently.Hong Kong is adapting its crypto regulations to be more inclusive while maintaining a cautious approach toward complex overseas virtual asset products. This regulatory shift underscores the region’s determination to foster its status as a leading hub for virtual assets, following a change of heart from its previous stance of skepticism and reluctance towards the crypto industry.

BOK Staffers Assess Crypto Market Vulnerabilities and Their ImplicationsOn Thursday, the Bank of Korea’s (BOK) staff members published an assessment of the vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency market and their potential implications. Here is the summary of the report.Photo by D Tan on Unsplash2022 crypto winterThroughout 2022, the worldwide crypto market faced a series of adverse occurrences, such as significant drops in the prices of major crypto-assets and the collapse of prominent crypto companies. These events shed light on the vulnerabilities that had accumulated during the rapid growth of the market.The first major event occurred in May 2022 when the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD experienced a sharp decline, resulting in substantial losses and bankruptcies for numerous retail investors and crypto firms. This incident significantly eroded confidence in the overall crypto market. The subsequent bankruptcies of prominent crypto lender Celsius and hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) further highlighted the realization of risks commonly associated with traditional financial markets, such as multiple collateral loans and maturity and liquidity mismatches, within the crypto market.In November 2022, the well-known crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy, demonstrating that the activities of a large crypto company can propagate risks through moral hazard and excessive profit-seeking behavior when it operates outside the realm of regulatory oversight.Similarities with TradFiThese negative events that unfolded in the global crypto market in 2022 share similarities with issues previously observed in financial markets, such as unsustainable business models, liquidity risk, leverage, and lack of transparency in financial conditions. These parallels suggest that if the crypto markets were subjected to comparable levels of regulation as traditional financial markets, it is plausible that the triggering of these risks could have been avoided altogether, or at the very least, the resulting damage could have been mitigated to some extent.Implications for the Korean marketAt present, it is deemed unlikely that events akin to those witnessed in overseas crypto markets will transpire in the Korean market. The Korean crypto-asset market has primarily evolved through exchanges, with limited influence from other enterprises such as crypto issuers and decentralized lending platforms. In addition, Korean crypto exchanges are subject to regulation under the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information. This mandates the separation of customer deposits from exchange assets and the strict management of custodial crypto-assets through secure wallets. Additionally, Korean exchanges are prohibited from listing their own tokens on their platforms.However, there remains a dearth of information regarding the business structures of crypto companies that offer services similar to those in the traditional financial industry. This lack of information poses challenges in accurately assessing risk and providing adequate investor protection. Meanwhile, there is a potential for a deeper integration between the crypto market and users’ daily lives, particularly through major technology companies, gaming companies, and security tokens.SuggestionsIt is vital to ensure that crypto-assets are regulated based on the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” through the ongoing development of crypto-asset-related legislation. The Financial Stability Board, an international body monitoring the global financial system, explained this principle in a 2022 paper: “Where crypto-assets and intermediaries perform an equivalent economic function to one performed by instruments and intermediaries of the traditional financial sector, they should be subject to equivalent regulation.”Additionally, it is necessary to stay aligned with major countries in terms of the speed and comprehensiveness of regulatory measures to prevent regulatory discrepancies across borders due to the global nature of crypto risks.Enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of regulation requires the establishment and maintenance of a close cooperation system between authorities. This collaborative effort should encompass various aspects, including monitoring, information gathering, and supervision of the crypto-asset market. Notably, the widespread adoption of stablecoins can affect the stability of the overall financial system, including monetary systems and payment and settlement systems. Hence, it is necessary to strengthen the involvement of central banks in the monitoring and supervision framework for crypto-assets, including stablecoins, as demonstrated by legislative approaches adopted by major economies like the EU. Furthermore, imposing disclosure requirements, external audits, and documentation submission obligations on crypto-asset operators is advisable.