CityLabs Secures 8.55% Stake in Gopax

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

According to a recent report from blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis, stablecoin purchases in Turkey amount to 4.3% of the country's GDP, surpassing all other global economies. The report, titled "The 2024 Crypto Spring Report" highlights Turkey's significant share of stablecoin transactions relative to its economic output.Photo by Michael Jerrard on UnsplashStablecoin activity in TurkeyBetween April 2023 and March 2024, stablecoin purchases in Turkey totaled $38 billion, representing 4.3% of the country's GDP, which was $907 billion as of 2022. This data encompasses transfers between the Turkish lira and stablecoins in either direction, emphasizing the scale of stablecoin activity within the Turkish economy. Chainalysis director of research Kim Grauer explained that stablecoin activity does not directly impact GDP but is expressed as a percentage to provide context for readers. Grauer clarified that the reported figure includes transfers of Turkish lira to stablecoins and vice versa. Turkey's prominence in stablecoin purchases stands out compared to other economies analyzed by Chainalysis. In Thailand and Georgia, stablecoin purchases accounted for 1.3% and 0.7% of GDP, respectively, over the same period. Global trends in stablecoin usageWhile the United States leads in stablecoin transaction volumes, with fiat purchases surpassing $20 billion in March 2024, Turkey's share of stablecoin purchases relative to GDP is notably higher. The use of stablecoins, including Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC), has outpaced other cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether, representing over 50% of all transaction volume in recent months. Rapid growth in stablecoin transactionsChainalysis analysts attribute the rapid growth of stablecoin transactions to their utility in everyday transactions beyond trading. Major jurisdictions, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Brazil and Thailand, have witnessed significant increases in fiat purchases of stablecoins over the past year. Nations experiencing currency volatility and devaluation, such as Turkey, have increasingly turned to stablecoins like USDT to safeguard their savings. Turkey's inflation rate surged to as high as 67% in March, prompting residents to seek alternative stores of value. The findings from Chainalysis underscore the growing prominence of stablecoins in global economic activity, particularly in nations grappling with currency instability. Turkey's significant share of stablecoin purchases relative to GDP reflects a broader trend of increasing adoption of stablecoins for everyday transactions and wealth preservation. 

STX Token Debuts on Korean Exchange BithumbSTX, the native token of the Stacks network, made its debut on the KRW market of Bithumb, a renowned Korean cryptocurrency exchange, at noon (Korea Standard Time) on Tuesday. The listing price is 828.5 KRW per unit.Photo by Jonathan Borba on UnsplashBitcoin scalability solutionStacks is a Bitcoin scalability solution that addresses the challenge of transaction latency through the use of microblocks. It utilizes the programming language Clarity and benefits from the security of Bitcoin by employing its unique consensus algorithm called Proof of Transfer (PoX). This mechanism enables Stacks to settle transactions on the Bitcoin network.Stacks is one of the most anticipated projects associated with Bitcoin, and its token was approved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2019.STX token usageThe STX token serves multiple purposes within the Stacks blockchain ecosystem. Users can utilize it for stacking, participating in governance activities, and paying transaction fees.