ONEUNIVERSE Holds Second NFT Sale for Champions Arena

Newly Published CoinGecko Index Tracks Alleged Crypto SecuritiesKuala Lumpur-based crypto data aggregator CoinGecko has unveiled a ground-breaking index spotlighting prominent cryptocurrency tokens that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has earmarked as potential securities.Through its “Top Alleged Securities Coins by Market Cap” page, the Malaysian aggregator categorizes a spectrum of cryptocurrency assets based on their market capitalization. At the forefront of this classification stands BNB, the native token of the Binance exchange and the BNB blockchain. It is closely followed by other prominent names such as Cardano, Solana, and Tron.Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash$90 billion in valueThe alleged securities amount to a whopping $90 billion in value according to their combined market capitalization right now. Putting this in context, the overall market capitalization of the entire crypto market currently stands at $1.2 trillion, of which Bitcoin accounts for over half a trillion dollars. This estimation paints a vivid picture of the immense scale of the cryptocurrency market and the potential reverberations of regulatory interventions.CoinGecko’s index came to fruition in the first week of August, meticulously pooling the tokens that the SEC has previously classified as securities during legal proceedings. The decision to consolidate these tokens into a single index underscores the increasingly intricate interplay between the cryptocurrency market and regulatory frameworks.Lack of clarityWhen project teams and other market participants have asked for explicit clarity, SEC Chair Gary Gensler has frustratingly indicated that people need to make a simple determination based on the Howey Test — a historic securities case that has been used in the US to determine what constitutes a security. The case dates back to 1946, long before the onset of digitization let alone digital currencies.Another issue is that the SEC is simply expressing an opinion based on its interpretation of existing securities law and securities case law. Without legislation in the US, clarity can only be provided in the courts. This is a flawed approach, as market participants have to wait for actions taken by the SEC against crypto entities to be adjudicated in the US courts in order to get a better understanding of the legal standing of these assets.This comprehensive analysis provided by CoinGecko’s new index presents invaluable insights into the dynamic terrain of cryptocurrency regulation. It underscores the intricate dynamics between the digital currency market and the regulatory bodies that seek to govern it.Taking the regulation of derivatives as a case in point, their emergence led to a very messy process of arriving at regulatory clarity. The very same thing is playing out with digital assets. While it is imperfect, there is no doubt that clarity will eventually be reached.In the meantime, as the US fumbles where digital assets are concerned, regional authorities in East Asia and the Middle East are capitalizing on US regulatory shortcomings, implying that we will likely see further growth in crypto and Web3 in these locations until the US recovers.

Oman’s Regulator Invites Feedback on Virtual Asset FrameworkProgressing toward the establishment of its own virtual asset regulations, the Sultanate of Oman is embarking on a significant step by soliciting public feedback on its comprehensive framework.The framework, which governs digital assets, is being developed by the Capital Market Authority (CMA) of Oman. The move reflects the country’s commitment to creating a robust regulatory environment for the virtual asset sector.The CMA’s consultation paper, released last week, outlines the agency’s objectives in crafting this regulatory framework. It aims to provide a viable financing and investment avenue for issuers and investors while also addressing the inherent risks associated with the virtual asset class. Central to this initiative is the integration of business requirements and measures to prevent market abuse.Photo by Niklas Weiss on Unsplash26 key questionsAt the heart of this regulatory endeavor are 26 crucial questions presented to industry stakeholders. Their valuable input will help shape the framework’s core components. These include provisions related to regulatory standards and licensing prerequisites for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), corporate governance, risk management, and the issuance of virtual assets.The proposed framework, as disclosed in the consultation paper, encompasses a spectrum of digital assets. This spans utility tokens, security tokens, fiat-backed and asset-backed stablecoins, and other currencies adhering to the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) definition of virtual assets. However, a noteworthy proposal that has garnered attention is the potential prohibition of privacy coins issuance, a decision pending public feedback.Aiming to reinforce accountability and stability, the CMA may mandate that VASPs establish a local presence in Oman through legally recognized entities and physical offices. Additionally, minimum capital requirements could be imposed on these entities. The envisaged framework may also stipulate that virtual asset firms maintain a low percentage of assets in hot wallets, conduct audits of safeguarded assets, and provide evidence of reserves.Shaping regulation through feedbackWith the consultation phase set to conclude on August 17, the public’s valuable feedback will shape the direction of Oman’s virtual asset regulations. The most salient viewpoints may find their place on the CMA’s official website. Following this consultation period, the CMA will proceed to finalize the regulatory framework.Although the public announcement regarding the launch of a regulatory framework was made on February 14, Oman’s journey toward regulating the virtual asset industry began well before. In November 2020, the National Committee for Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing initiated discussions on forming a task force.Comprising officials from the CMA and the Central Bank of Oman, the task force explored whether to permit or prohibit virtual asset activities. Subsequently, in December 2022, consultants were engaged to facilitate the establishment of this new regulatory landscape.The United Arab Emirates, and in particular, the individual emirates of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, have led the way in the Middle East in progressing a workable framework for the digital asset industry. Oman’s proactive approach is following the example set by its regional peer.Shaping its virtual asset framework underlines its desire to foster innovation while ensuring the integrity of its financial landscape. Its latest effort in seeking public feedback is a positive development that should assist it in arriving at a progressive framework.

CipherBlade Opens Singapore OfficeThe emerging crypto hubs in Asia continue to make progress and on this occasion blockchain and crypto investigations firm, CipherBlade has decided to be part of that emerging growth in Singapore, opening an office in the city state.Cybercrime investigationsAccording to Asia-centric digital assets publication, Blockhead, the firm’s decision to open an Asian base was rooted in a need to service the requirements of a growing client base in the region, as demand intensifies for its services. CipherBlade has developed an expertise in the particular niche of blockchain analytics, cryptocurrency investigations and digital forensics.The firm was co-founded by its lead investigator Richard Sanders in 2018. Initially based out of Pittsburgh, CipherBlade has team members distributed internationally, in Europe, and now also in Singapore via its new office location.CipherBlade’s CEO of Americas, Justin Maile, said that “Singapore is a perfect location for us, with its strong reputation as a financial hub and its commitment to technological innovation.”With the expansion, it is understood that the company is currently recruiting to fill a variety of specialist positions.Photo by cottonbro studio on PexelsTracking down hackersAs the crypto and blockchain sector as a whole grows, it has also been accompanied by a significant component of illegal and illicit activity. This includes money laundering, fraud and hacking. The stand out example in the Asian region would be the activities of hacker collective, Lazarus Group.The hacker group has become notorious in the crypto space, given the extent to which it has pulled off hacks of various entities and DeFi networks in the sector. Hacks and exploits of DeFi networks accounted for 82% of all digital assets stolen in 2022. Lazarus Group has received particular attention as it is understood to be affiliated with the North Korean regime.The default approach for start-ups across all sectors is to focus on growth. The danger for start-ups in the DeFi space is that they overlook elements of network security in pursuing that growth, when achieving a high level of network security is an incredibly difficult task to begin with.Collaborating with industry stakeholdersThe activities of Lazarus Group and other more disparate entities like them, have created a need for the services of companies like CipherBlade. To that end, the firm collaborates with a wide range of industry stakeholders, including regulators, law enforcement, intelligence agencies and cryptocurrency exchanges.Recent work the blockchain forensics and cybercrime firm has been involved in includes a class action lawsuit brought against failed crypto lender Voyager. The allegation of the class action is that Voyager built in hidden fees to the detriment of customers.From crypto divorces to ‘pig butchering’ scamsPointing to the diversity of the firm’s work, it has been involved in over 150 crypto divorce cases. That is to say, tracking down digital assets belonging to one of the parties to a divorce so that those assets are recognized and made part of any divorce settlement.CipherBlade’s investigators have worked on cases involving ‘pig butchering’ crypto scams. These are instances of scams that lure the victim into contact with the scammer before the scammer gains their confidence, directing them onwards towards fraudulent crypto investment platforms where they’re encouraged to invest.