Survey Reveals Over Half of Korean Financial Firms Eyeing Both Issuance and Distribution of…

Hong Kong Pressing Banks to Facilitate Crypto ClientsHong Kong’s banking regulator is urging banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, to onboard crypto exchanges as clients, despite increasing regulatory scrutiny of the industry in the United States.That’s according to a report published by the Financial Times (FT) on Wednesday. The FT cited three people who it claims are familiar with the matter, together with a letter seen by the publication as the basis for the assertion.Photo by Ansel Lee on PexelsChallenging crypto banking reticenceAt a recent meeting, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) questioned these UK-based lenders, together with the Bank of China, about their reluctance to accept crypto exchanges as customers, according to sources familiar with the matter. The HKMA emphasized that due diligence on potential clients should not create unnecessary burdens, particularly for those seeking opportunities in Hong Kong. While banks do not have a ban on crypto clients, concerns over potential money laundering and illegal activities have made them cautious.The pressure faced by banks highlights the challenges Hong Kong is facing in establishing itself as a global hub for the crypto industry, especially in light of previous high-profile collapses, such as the implosion of FTX. However, the HKMA is encouraging banks to overcome their reservations, as the regulator believes there is resistance from senior executives who adhere to traditional banking mindsets.The enthusiasm of some Hong Kong officials for the sector is evident as pro-Beijing lawmaker Johnny Ng invited Coinbase and other crypto exchanges to set up operations in the city following the recent SEC lawsuit against Binance and Coinbase.Caught between opposing forcesBanks in Hong Kong find themselves walking a fine line between supporting the crypto industry as encouraged by the government and being cautious due to the US regulatory environment. They want to ensure the industry’s development aligns with government policies, but they are also concerned about potential anti-money laundering and know-your-customer issues.The HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have been vocal about their expectations, setting them apart from regulators in other jurisdictions that may be more skeptical of cryptocurrencies. Last month it emerged that crypto startups are having difficulties in establishing banking facilities in the autonomous Chinese territory. At the time, the HKMA did convene a meeting to bring parties together in order to forge a path forward.While Hong Kong has a history as a crypto center, its position weakened after Beijing’s crackdown on the industry in 2017. However, the Hong Kong government aims to reestablish the city as a hub for digital assets, having expressed its desire to provide a supportive environment for crypto-related businesses. The introduction of a new licensing regime for crypto platforms in Hong Kong is part of the government’s efforts to attract more crypto groups to the city.HSBC, Standard Chartered, and the Bank of China hold influential positions in Hong Kong as issuers of the city’s currency and have key roles in the Hong Kong Association of Banks lobby group. Standard Chartered claims that it maintains regular dialogue with regulators on various subjects, while HSBC has claimed that it is actively engaging in policies and developments within the nascent industry.

Thailand's Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved the leading U.S. dollar stablecoins USDT and USDC, expanding its list of approved cryptocurrencies within the Southeast Asian country.Photo by Tarun Ottur on UnsplashListing on regulated exchanges The approval was announced in a statement published on the SEC website on March 6. It means that Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC can now be listed on regulated exchanges in Thailand. The regulator had arrived at its decision to add the two stablecoins following a public consultation process regarding regulatory changes. Those changes were finalized last month and will now proceed to go into effect on March 16. The two stablecoins join five cryptocurrencies that had previously been approved. These include Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM). Certain cryptocurrencies are also being used for the testing of payment settlement through the Bank of Thailand’s Programmable Payment Sandbox.   A regulatory sandbox is a controlled environment testing ground for products and services developed within the private sector. Back in June of last year, the Southeast Asian country’s central bank launched an enhanced regulatory sandbox focused on programmable payments.  USDT issuer Tether responded to the addition of its stablecoin within the approved cryptocurrency list, stating: “This approval enables USD₮ to be traded within the country, facilitating its listing on regulated exchanges and paving the way for USD₮ to be accepted for payments, which advances the region’s leadership in digital asset innovation.” Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said that the company sees value in the Thai market and with that, it intends to continue to explore ways to broaden its service offering within Thailand. He added:  “We are committed to supporting the long-term success and adoption of stablecoins in Thailand and look forward to contributing to the growth of the country’s digital asset ecosystem by fostering a strong and sustainable stablecoin infrastructure.” Stablecoin market growth According to DeFi data aggregation platform DefiLlama, the stablecoin market now stands at $227 billion in terms of market capitalization. This represents a 68% increase by comparison with the size of the market in 2023. It indicates that stablecoin adoption is on an upward growth trajectory. Digital assets are being used in many instances to facilitate international payments and remittances, particularly in emerging markets. In Europe, American investment bank JPMorgan recently forecasted that the introduction of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation will drive euro-pegged stablecoin growth.  Meanwhile, in the United States, S&P Global Ratings recently identified that a current lack of stablecoin regulation is acting as a barrier to broader institutional use. The company anticipates adoption growth once regulatory clarity has been achieved. Vlad Tenev, CEO of commission-free investing platform Robinhood, stated last month on Yahoo Finance’s Opening Bid podcast that stablecoin legislation will be passed in the U.S. in 2025. Tenev believes that applying a 4% interest rate to stablecoins would lead to a greater rate of adoption.

In an effort to safeguard crypto investors from falling prey to misleading advertisements, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Thailand has intensified its scrutiny of promotional campaigns within the crypto sphere.  Broker agent eventsOn April 29, the Bangkok Post reported that the SEC has raised concerns regarding the potential violation of local regulations through introducing broker agent (IBA) events. These events, the SEC clarified, may breach regulations as IBAs are only permitted to promote digital token services to deter speculation on cryptocurrencies, categorized as high-risk assets. IBAs, acting as local conduits for partner digital asset exchanges, typically earn commissions by onboarding clients within a specific market. Such practices are common for exchanges or brokers that don't directly operate in certain markets. Deputy Secretary-General Anek Yooyuen conveyed the commission's unease over crypto exchanges offering preferential treatment to onboard users. Yooyuen stated: "When operators organise sales promotions by offering rewards to entice people to use the service, this could encourage use of the service without considering the investment risks. This is especially the case for cryptocurrencies.”Photo by Than Diep on UnsplashWarning of consequencesHe cautioned that failure to adhere to these guidelines would result in “punishment according to the law.” While cryptocurrency exchanges are legal in Thailand, they must secure local approval. Notably, last month, Thailand even greenlit asset management firms to launch private funds, offering Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) exclusively to institutional and ultra-high-net-worth investors. Nonetheless, the country recently prohibited the sale of cryptocurrency lending products and mandated that exchanges prominently display risk warning messages. International regulatory trendThis move by the Thai SEC mirrors actions taken by regulators in other major crypto markets. For instance, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued 450 alerts for illegal crypto ads in 2023 alone. Similarly, Spain’s principal securities market regulator, the National Stock Market Commission, denounced fraudulent crypto asset promotions in November 2023, emphasizing companies’ obligations to adhere to local laws. Thai advertising guidelines mandate businesses and advertisers to substantiate the “facts” presented in their campaigns, failing which could lead to legal repercussions. A recent incident provides a case in point. Hackers hijacked advertisements on Etherscan, redirecting users to phishing sites aimed at draining crypto wallets. Scam Sniffer, a blockchain investigation firm, attributed the widespread phishing campaign to the inadequate oversight by advertisement aggregators. The company made the following statement on the matter: “Etherscan aggregates ads from platforms like Coinzilla and Persona, where insufficient filtering could lead to exposure to phishing attempts.” The wallet drainer scam involves enticing users to counterfeit websites and coercing them to link their crypto wallets, enabling scammers to siphon funds into their own wallets without user authentication or consent. This is not the first time that the authorities in Thailand have homed in on crypto-related advertising. In August 2023, the southeast Asian country’s Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) outlined that it had engaged with social media firm Meta, owner of Facebook, informing it that its response to the proliferation of fraudulent platform ads relative to crypto had been inadequate.