Korea’s Most Populated Province to Conduct Survey on Unfair Crypto Trading

Financial technology firm Circle is taking a measured approach in Hong Kong, favoring focus over expansion. In an interview with the Hong Kong Economic Journal, cited by local financial content provider AAStocks, Yam Ki Chan, the company’s vice president for Asia Pacific, said there are no current plans to issue a stablecoin pegged to the Hong Kong dollar. Still, he noted the company’s openness to partnering with local initiatives, adding that Circle has been in discussions with several firms to share its expertise and insights. The firm hopes the Chinese special administrative region will evolve into a launchpad for stablecoins tied to the local currency alongside other major currencies. Chan said Circle is doubling down on its two core products, the U.S. dollar stablecoin USDC and the euro stablecoin EURC. He pointed out that USDC has been catching on across the region, with more local corporations and professional investors starting to use it. His comments come after the Stablecoins Ordinance came into force on Aug. 1 in the city, setting up a mandatory licensing system for issuers under the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). The regulator has said it does not plan to hand out the first licenses until early next year.Photo by tommao wang on UnsplashMoving assets on-chainWhile Circle continues to focus on stablecoins, other firms are finding new ways to bring traditional assets on-chain. DL Holdings, a Hong Kong-headquartered one-stop financial services group, is moving ahead with plans to tokenize about $40 million worth of its non-voting Class B membership interest in ONE Carmel, its luxury real estate investment project in California’s San Francisco Bay Area. The initiative, the firm’s first step into real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, will use blockchain-based smart contracts to automate distributions, transfers, and investor rights, allowing the company to pay out dividends to shareholders and give on-chain investors a chance to participate in ONE Carmel. Insurance is another testbed for blockchain. Anthea Holding Limited, a crypto-fintech licensed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority, raised $22 million in a Series A led by Yunfeng Financial. The proceeds will fund what Anthea says is the world’s first life insurance policy denominated in Ethereum (ETH). Yunfeng Financial, listed in Hong Kong, has close ties to Alibaba founder Jack Ma. Mainland firms deepen crypto exposureMainland companies are stepping into crypto investments. Hangzhou-based Jiuzi Holdings, a Nasdaq-listed operator of new energy vehicle stores, said it completed a private placement transaction settled in 100 Bitcoin. The company plans to allocate the proceeds to building a digital-asset custody platform and developing encrypted storage systems. Separately, China Renaissance is seeking to raise around $600 million for a publicly listed vehicle designed to invest in BNB, the cryptocurrency tied to Binance, according to Bloomberg. Venture firm YZi Labs, formerly Binance Labs, is expected to join the effort. In an August filing, the Beijing-based investment bank said it would commit about $100 million of its own capital to BNB. If completed, the proceeds would establish a U.S.-based crypto treasury company to hold and manage BNB reserves. Back in Hong Kong, momentum in the digital asset sector is now reaching the capital markets. HashKey Group, the financial services firm behind a licensed crypto exchange, has confidentially filed for an initial public offering in the city. Bloomberg reported the plan, citing a source familiar with the matter. The listing could take place as early as this year and raise up to $500 million. Market bounces back on softer trade rhetoricAmid these developments, crypto prices have rebounded from sharp losses linked to trade tensions between Washington and Beijing. The market had tumbled after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to impose additional 100% tariffs on China. Sentiment shifted when Trump softened his stance on Truth Social, writing, “Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine!” and “The U.S.A. wants to help China, not hurt it!!!” Bitcoin reflected that whiplash. The token dropped to $103,893.3 on Oct. 10 during what Investing.com described as the largest single-day liquidation in crypto history at nearly $19 billion in positions. It has since recovered to $112,608.31 as of publication time. 

Japan’s largest bank, MUFG, has teamed up with KlimaDAO Japan, the provider of a digital reserve currency backed by carbon credits, to explore the use of the JPYC stablecoin for settling tokenized carbon credit transactions on the Progmat blockchain platform. Settlement on ProgmatProgmat provides the infrastructure to enable the issuance of various stablecoins. Last September, MUFG announced a collaboration with Binance geared towards stablecoin issuance. The JPYC stablecoin, operational since 2021, functions as a prepaid money instrument, similar to a prepaid card, due to its existence before Japan’s stablecoin legislation. Under new regulations, JPYC can either obtain a money transmitter license or issue a trust-style stablecoin with a bank like MUFG acting as the trustee for the stablecoin's reserves. Last year, JPYC formed a partnership with MUFG implicating the use of the Progmat platform.  This partnership, along with the involvement of Kansai Electric subsidiary Optage as the integration partner, sets the stage for the KlimaDAO stablecoin experiments. Optage will provide the corporate infrastructure required to manage the carbon credits added to the blockchain and provide a means for funds settlement to be achieved via bank transfer. Through the use of various local stablecoins for the purpose of settlement, it’s hoped that improved liquidity on a global basis may be achieved.Photo by Dan Meyers on UnsplashInitially recognized for making tokenized carbon credits accessible on public blockchains, KlimaDAO's functionality extends beyond this. The organization also offers the capability to retire credits. Last year, KlimaDAO expanded its reach by launching Carbonmark, an enterprise-focused marketplace.  This platform, which utilizes blockchain technology, namely Polygon, and smart contracts, offers a user-friendly experience by integrating traditional payment methods like bank transfers and SAP integration.  J-CreditsJapan operates a national scheme known as J-credits, and the Tokyo Stock Exchange has introduced a secondary market for these credits. J-credits are designed to certify the amount by which greenhouse gas emissions have been reduced through the use of carbon sinks in Japan. However, the volume of J-credit transactions remains low, reflecting the broader state of Japan's voluntary carbon market.  KlimaDAO aims to address this by launching the KlimaDAO Japan Market, simplifying the process for domestic companies to purchase and utilize carbon credits. This initiative will involve tokenizing J-credits, referred to as D-Carbons.  Andrew Bonneau, KlimaDAO co-founder, outlined on X that “@KlimaDAO is in a unique position to facilitate an efficient J-Credit market on chain, while serving as the base infrastructure for integrating these assets with 3rd party services.” While the initial phase will use traditional bank payments, the ultimate goal is to transition to using stablecoins, particularly the JPYC stablecoin. Norbert Gehrke, an observer of developments within the Japanese fintech scene, outlined on Medium that the Japanese carbon credit market is likely to reach three trillion yen ($19.15 billion) by 2030. Meanwhile, the global carbon credit market has a current value of 39 trillion yen ($249 billion). KlimaDAO Japan has mentioned the use of a permissionless blockchain for this initiative but has fallen short of confirming that the Polygon network will be relied upon. Japan has several homegrown blockchains, which might be considered for this project.  At the time of writing, the KLIMA token had risen 31% over the course of the previous 24 hours, with a unit price of $3.53 according to CoinGecko. 

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight.