Parachain Fork Sees Transition to Enjin Blockchain

Lack of Funds Sees Multichain Cease OperationsThe development team behind Multichain, a cross-chain protocol, has recently announced its decision to cease operations due to a lack of operational funds.This announcement follows a report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, which suggested that insiders may have orchestrated a “rug pull” by withdrawing funds. The Multichain team took to Twitter on Friday to inform their community about the suspension of their business activities, citing a lack of alternative sources of information and operational funds as the primary reasons for their decision.One crucial factor contributing to the shutdown is the absence of communication with the CEO, Zhaojun, who had been missing and is now understood to be in the custody of Chinese authorities. The team explained that they had reached out to Zhaojun’s family and discovered that the police had seized his computers, phones, wallets, and mnemonic phrases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashOperational controlThroughout the project’s lifespan, Zhaojun had maintained control over operational and investor funds. Consequently, the team, along with all their funds and access to servers, found themselves at Zhaojun’s mercy, as he now remains under police custody.Attempting to salvage the situation, Zhaojun’s sister initiated an asset preservation act and transferred some funds to addresses under her control. However, the team soon received news that Zhaojun’s sister, too, had been detained by the police and was now unreachable. Faced with these unfortunate circumstances, the team reluctantly announced the cessation of their operations.DeFi centralization risksThe debacle has raised concerns about the lack of decentralization demonstrated by the level of control Zhaojun had over the project. It prompted comment from Chris Blec, a DeFi Researcher & Analyst who has been highly critical of a whole host of DeFi projects on the basis that while many DeFi projects claim to be decentralized, they’re critically flawed and are centralized to a point that puts them at critical risk.Taking to Twitter, Blec stated: “Dude gets thrown in jail, admin keys to Multichain are on his computers, sister eventually uses his computer to steal money, now she’s in jail too. THIS IS WHY WE DECENTRALIZE.”The Multichain debacle traces back to May when the suspension of Multichain routes for an upgrade caused delays in fund transfers. The uncertainties surrounding the protocol prompted crypto exchange Binance to halt deposit and withdrawal support for certain Multichain bridged tokens.Adding to the platform’s woes, significant outflows from the Multichain MPC bridge platform raised concerns of an exploit. Observers analyzing the blockchain data reached a consensus on July 6 that the protocol had been hacked, as over $100 million worth of assets were withdrawn from the Fantom bridge on the Ethereum side.As Multichain now faces the unfortunate reality of halting its operations, it serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and risks inherent in the blockchain industry. The lack of operational funds, combined with the absence of communication with key figures and critical points of centralized failure have proven insurmountable for this cross-chain protocol.

Animoca Brands Holding $3.4B in Cash and ReservesDigital entertainment, blockchain and gamification firm Animoca Brands provided an update on its financial position on Thursday, disclosing $3.4 billion in cash and assets as held on its balance sheet and in tokenized reserves as of April 30.Photo by regularguy.eth on UnsplashA financial breakdownThe Hong Kong-based Web3 firm published the interim financial report to its website. Breaking that down further, the company is holding $194 million in cash and stablecoin reserves. Additionally, $566 million is being held in liquid digital assets. This includes reserves of $SAND, the native token of the Ethereum-based Sandbox virtual metaverse.Beyond this, Animoca holds $2.7 billion in a varied portfolio of digital asset reserves, linked to its majority owned Web3 subsidiaries and portfolio companies. The firm outlined that it intends to release additional financial updates in the near future. That will include an audited financial statement for 2020. Furthermore, a summary statement of business activity for 2022 will be released, together with similar business highlights pertaining to Q1, 2023.Adjusting to changing market conditionsIt’s likely that Animoca took the decision to release this data at this point to bolster confidence in the company, off the back of a number of announcements that may have led some in the industry to question the overall financial health of the company.According to a report published in March by Reuters, Animoca Brands cut its target for its metaverse fund by 20% to $800 million. The scaling back was understood by many crypto sector commentators to be a reaction by the company due to changing market conditions within the crypto space. It was the second such adjustment the company made. In November 2022, the firm was working on the new fund, initially proposing a target of $2 billion. Once January came around, Animoca took the decision to scale that target back by half to $1 billion.Subsequent to reports of the fund scale-back being published, Animoca Brands CEO Yat Siu reacted, telling one crypto media outlet that “the claim that the Animoca Capital fund target was ‘cut’ from $2 billion to $1 billion is not correct, because $1 billion has always been within the range declared.”Playing down the news further, the company added: “There’s no doubt that the FTX and banking crises have had a serious impact on available venture capital, but fundraising for the Animoca Capital fund is in progress. When the raise is concluded, we will inform the market with the appropriate details, including the final size of this fund.”Siu stated that as the source of that report was an unnamed source, it was difficult to figure out the agenda of that person in broadcasting that claim.Animoca is perceived in the industry as a key player, particularly so when it comes to NFTs, blockchain-based gaming and the metaverse. The firm is classed as a Crypto Top 40 company by Forbes, while being a winner of Deloitte’s Technology Fast 50 award. Deloitte’s Technology Fast 50 program ranks fast growing companies based upon their percentage revenue growth over the course of three years.

Cross Trading of LUNA Tokens Uncovered on Three Korean Crypto ExchangesAccording to a report by the Maeil Business Newspaper on Wednesday, it was discovered that cross trading of LUNA tokens took place on three South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges: Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax.Three crypto exchangesAn indictment by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office against Terraform Labs co-founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin, along with interviews conducted within the cryptocurrency industry, revealed that Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax were involved in cross trading LUNA tokens with a combined value of $598 million. Specifically, Bithumb accounted for $224 million, Coinone for $299 billion, and GoPax for $74 billion.The prosecution has confirmed that cross trading continued until the end of February 2022, a period marked by significant demands for virtual asset legislation from both the market and academia. Despite widespread calls for regulations to curb unfair trading practices, these instances of cross trading went undetected.Classification of LUNAMoreover, it is reported that legal punishment for the $598 million worth of cross trading is challenging unless LUNA tokens are officially recognized as securities by the court. Under the Korean Capital Markets Act, only cross trading involving tokens identified as securities can be subject to penalties as a form of market manipulation.During a plenary session of the National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Justice Minister Han Dong-hoon made a statement suggesting that LUNA tokens could be considered securities due to their backing by real-world assets. However, he said that this distinction might not apply to other tokens.On April 25, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Shin and others as accomplices to Kwon, assuming that LUNA tokens were indeed securities. This case now revolves around whether the prosecution can successfully establish the classification of LUNA tokens as securities during the trial, making it the central issue in the case.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashCrypto investor protection legislationLast Thursday, the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee approved a bill known as the “Virtual Assets User Protection Act,” signaling an accelerated legislative process. However, there are arguments suggesting that the definition of cross trading should be further clarified in either the legislation or enforcement decree.A representative of a law firm specializing in virtual assets stated that the implementation of the User Protection Act would take another year even after its promulgation, making it challenging to retrospectively penalize cross trading practices that had already occurred.