Coin Oasis Founder Thinks UAE Set Up For Crypto Success

Dubai Regulator Hits OPNX With $2.7M PenaltyCrypto bankruptcy claims trading platform OPNX and its founders have been hit with a hefty fine, imposed by Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). The penalty, amounting to AED 10 million ($2.7 million), was levied on the newly established exchange in accordance with a notice published by the regulator on Wednesday.Photo by Agnieszka Stankiewicz on UnsplashPayment outstandingVARA’s recent announcement highlighted that the fine had been imposed in May and remains outstanding. The regulatory body disclosed that individual fines of AED 200,000 ($54,451) each were imposed on Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the controversial founders of failed Singapore-based crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Additionally, fines were also imposed on two other co-founders of OPNX. The penalties were attributed to failures in adhering to regulations governing marketing, advertising, and promotions.OPNX, established earlier this year by Su Zhu and Kyle Davies in collaboration with Mark Lamb and Sudhu Arumugam, positioned itself as a trading platform for crypto claims following the collapse of their Three Arrows Capital (3AC) fund last summer. The duo has since made Dubai their primary operational base.Further action“In light of the company’s unpaid fine, VARA shall determine consequential actions warranted against OPNX, which may include further fines, penalties, and/or taking any actions necessary to recover payment and definitively remedy the behavior,” stated VARA in an official statement.Dubai is making a concerted effort to nurture the development of crypto-related business, implementing various initiatives in order to bring that about. However, as part of that strategy, Dubai’s regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies has taken a more stringent turn this year, with the introduction of a new regulatory framework mandating that companies catering to retail investors must secure full licensing from VARA.Concerns arose in February when regulatory authorities discovered that OPNX was actively seeking customers for its platform and collecting personal data without proper authorization.Formal reprimandsIn April VARA issued an investor alert, outlining that OPNX was not a regulated entity although it was operating from Dubai. Shortly afterwards, formal reprimands followed for the two 3AC founders, alongside Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, and OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb.Leslie Lamb, in a previous interview with Bloomberg, emphasized that OPNX had not actively marketed itself toward Dubai or the broader UAE market. She stressed the company’s full cooperation with VARA’s ongoing investigation, asserting that no regulatory guidelines had been breached.“While Kyle and I contributed the initial ideas for OPNX, Leslie is very much the CEO, and we aren’t involved in day-to-day operations,” stated Su Zhu, clarifying their roles.Despite the regulatory setback, both Su Zhu and Kyle Davies continued to promote OPNX on the X platform (formerly known as Twitter).It emerged recently that the claims trading platform has been eyeing the acquisition of failed crypto lender Hodlnaut, which is currently undergoing court-supervised restructuring in Singapore. Zhu and Davies have come in for a lot of criticism within the crypto sector, having left a long list of unpaid creditors as a consequence of the failure of 3AC. The duo recently suggested that they would contribute profits from OPNX to 3AC creditors despite the fact that they have been uncooperative with the 3AC bankruptcy process.

Hong Kong regulators signal embrace of spot crypto ETFsHong Kong has signaled its readiness to usher in spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs), as the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) jointly announced on Friday that they are prepared to accept applications for such funds.Photo by Oskar Kadaksoo on UnsplashUpdated virtual asset-related policyIn a set of circulars released, a joint circular representing both regulators and a separate circular published by the SFC, they outlined the updated policy for intermediaries engaging in virtual asset-related activities.The SFC, responsible for overseeing financial markets in Hong Kong, expressed its openness to applications for the authorization of funds with exposure to virtual assets, specifically mentioning virtual asset spot exchange-traded funds (VA spot ETFs).This move expands beyond the existing crypto futures ETFs, demonstrating Hong Kong’s commitment to adapting its regulatory landscape to the evolving crypto market. It also builds on positive commentary made by SFC CEO Julia Leung on the subject last month. Leung stated that the regulator was open to the notion of retail participation in spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong.Leung stated:“We welcome proposals using innovative technology that boosts efficiency and customer experience. We’re happy to give it a try as long as new risks are addressed. Our approach is consistent regardless of the asset.”Use of license platformsFriday’s SFC circular emphasized that transactions conducted by these ETFs must occur through SFC-licensed crypto platforms or authorized financial institutions. The SFC outlined that both in-kind and in-cash subscription and redemption methods are permissible for SFC-authorized spot VA ETFs, providing flexibility in fund management.Custody requirements were also addressed, with the SFC specifying that the trustee or custodian must delegate its crypto custody function exclusively to an SFC-licensed Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) or entities meeting the crypto custody standards set by the HKMA.Industry responseThese latest circulars from the regulators have prompted a response from the industry. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has reacted, welcoming the announcement. It believes that such a move would serve to strengthen Hong Kong’s position as a digital asset hub in the region. The exchange already lists a number of crypto futures ETFs, with multinational investment bank UBS having recently extended access to these products to its Hong Kong-based high-net-worth clients.While the regulatory landscape in the United States in 2023 has proven to be hostile, one very positive development appears to be ongoing work towards spot bitcoin ETF approval. Although still a matter of speculation, many industry commentators believe that approval will come through on Jan. 10. The advent of spot bitcoin and crypto ETFs in both eastern and western markets would likely make for an extremely bullish 2024 for the industry.Hong Kong’s move towards spot crypto ETFs aligns with its proactive stance in adapting to the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. The regulatory framework, as outlined in the circulars, reflects a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring investor protection. The city’s financial authorities have taken a comprehensive approach to review and update policies, once again signaling their ongoing commitment to embracing the growing role of virtual assets in the financial world.

KCS Says Illegal Forex Transactions for Crypto Purchases Amount to $7.7BOver the past five years, the total value of illegal foreign exchange transactions associated with virtual asset purchases has amounted to approximately KRW 10.4 trillion ($7.7 billion), according to the Korea Customs Service’s report received on Thursday by Go Yong-jin, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea on the National Assembly’s Strategy and Finance Committee.Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash“Illegal transactions on foreign exchanges for the purchase of virtual assets are occurring due to the higher prices of virtual assets in Korea compared to prices abroad,” Go explained.Crimes incited by crypto waveThe data showed that the number of violations subject to fines was 6,066, involving forex transactions of KRW 2.3 trillion. In particular, violations made in 2020 and 2022 accounted for the majority, making up 78.7% with 4,775 cases and a value of KRW 1.9 trillion, or 83.7% of the cumulative total. This indicates a substantial increase in illegal activities during the periods when the crypto investment frenzy in Korea was at its peak.Uncovering key patternsWhile foreign exchange transactions were primarily intended for acquiring virtual assets, they were often disguised as trade payments. There were also cases where individuals withdrew foreign currency from overseas ATMs to buy cryptocurrencies. These two scenarios were the most prevalent cases for which fines were imposed. More specifically, among the 6,066 violations, there were 4,518 instances of the former and 1,486 cases of the latter. The transferred funds amounted to KRW 1.9 trillion and KRW 407 billion, respectively.During the five-year period, individuals involved in 93 cases of these forex activities — collectively valued at KRW 8.1 trillion — were penalized following the referral of their cases to prosecutors. In particular, the violations in 2022 accounted for 70.3% (KRW 5.7 trillion). This could be accredited to the breakout of suspicious large-scale forex transactions last year, which prompted local authorities such as the Korea Customs Service and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) to initiate planned investigations.The most common type of illegal foreign exchange transaction cases referred to prosecutors was similar to those that incurred fines: overseas remittances disguised as trade payments, constituting 49.9% (KRW 4 trillion) of all cases. Transferring foreign currency via unregistered entities was the second most common violation, making up 47.2% (KRW 3.8 trillion). These transfers breach the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act and are always reported to prosecutors.Go thereby called on authorities to intensify crackdowns on illegal forex transactions aimed at trading virtual assets and to revise foreign exchange regulations accordingly.