Taiwan’s Comma3 Ventures Raises $45M Crypto Fund

Wemade to unveil upgraded DAO platform Wepublic in FebruarySouth Korean gaming publisher Wemade’s blockchain-powered social platform Wepublic is scheduled to undergo a revamp this coming February, according to an official press release on Wemade’s website on Monday (KST).Photo by Christin Hume on UnsplashDecentralized empowermentWepublic is a platform that employs decentralized protocols to allow a wide variety of official organizations — from political and religious factions to non-profit organizations — to build and operate decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) based on the transparent sharing of the status of their funds.Through its integration of blockchain technology, Wepublic guarantees the transparency and integrity of all information and records stored on its platform, safeguarding them against counterfeiting and diversion. The platform notably emphasizes the ability of all participants in a DAO to partake in organizational activities and democratic decision-making.Major overhaulThe upcoming second version, Wepublic 2.0, will extend access to individuals and non-official groups. In particular, a new feature called Wepublic Point will be added, which will enable donations and further solidify the platform’s decentralized protocols. The platform will also offer connectivity with social media platforms, boosting accessibility.Wemade stated that it is currently recruiting the first cohort for Wepublic’s support group, Wepublic Supporters, which will be responsible for planning and executing promotional projects on the platform for 12 weeks starting from Jan. 25. College and postgraduate students are eligible to apply until Jan. 13. Those who stand out with their performance will get the opportunity to apply for an internship at Wemade.

Binance Behind New Hong Kong Crypto Exchange Pursuing LicenseThe launch of a crypto exchange named HKVAEX in Hong Kong has raised eyebrows as it appears to be closely connected to the global cryptocurrency giant, Binance.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashResource sharingWhile the two entities do not officially acknowledge any affiliation, they share resources and have some commonalities that suggest a deeper connection, according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Wednesday.HKVAEX was established in Hong Kong as an independent entity under BX Services Limited. Despite the absence of shared names, official affiliations, or public statements, several clues point to a connection. The logos of Binance and HKVAEX bear a resemblance, and Binance’s official accounts, as well as CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ), are among HKVAEX’s followers on social media platform X (formerly Twitter).Gaining a foothold in Hong KongIt’s worth noting that Binance’s services are not available in Hong Kong, which raises questions about the motivation behind establishing an independent entity within the city. While HKVAEX appears to be actively pursuing a virtual asset license in Hong Kong, Binance has been relatively silent about its own licensing plans within the Chinese autonomous territory. This move could potentially provide Binance with a strategic foothold in a market that is becoming increasingly significant for digital asset entities.Hong Kong has recently introduced a licensing scheme for digital asset entities, and this development has spurred enthusiasm among such entities to establish operations in the region. Alvin Kan, the Head of Asia at Sei Labs, has noted that Asia is poised to become a major expansion zone for the Web3 sector, with regulatory developments in the US creating opportunities for expansion beyond American borders.Stanley Fung, who currently heads up HKVAEX, previously served as the chief of Huobi’s Hong Kong operations until November 2022, according to his LinkedIn profile. His departure from Huobi coincided with the entrance of crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun into Huobi’s management.In a company-managed Telegram group, HKVAEX has emphasized its status as an “independent crypto exchange” in Hong Kong, separate from Binance. However, it also revealed that it sources liquidity from Binance. Despite asserting its independence and having its own technical team, there have been instances of collaboration between the two entities in Hong Kong, such as a promotional campaign where Binance was referred to as a “partner” in incentivizing the opening of an HKVAEX account.Changing strategyBinance has faced a series of regulatory challenges in recent times. In May, Binance exited the Canadian market due to new regulations related to stablecoins and restrictions on crypto exchanges. In the US, the two leading regulators have filed lawsuits against Binance, CZ, and related entities, leading to the departure of several top officials from the company.The leading global exchange appears to be pursuing a different strategy more recently. It has entered the Japanese and Thai markets through the acquisition of a local entity and a joint venture with a local company. While forced out of the Netherlands, its Dutch customers were moved to rival Coinmerce, which connects to the Binance trading engine and order books.The evolving regulatory landscape is reshaping the cryptocurrency industry, and the relationship between Binance and HKVAEX highlights the complexities and strategies adopted by major players in this evolving space.

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities BackingUSDT stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) has long faced persistent scrutiny and criticism due to the lack of transparency surrounding the assets backing their digital currencies. The latest allegations come in the form of a report by Bloomberg on Friday suggesting that the world’s largest stablecoin was once backed by securities issued by Chinese companies.Photo by Manuel Joseph on PexelsNYAG releases documentsThese findings were based on documents made public by the New York Attorney General (NY AG). The documents disclosed that Tether had listed securities issued by China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China as part of its reserves backing the USDT stablecoin.Rumors about USDT’s exposure to Chinese securities have circulated for a number of years. In 2021, a Bloomberg research report revealed that Tether’s reserves reportedly included billions of dollars in short-term loans to China-based companies, as well as a significant loan to the collapsed crypto lender Celsius Network.However, in February 2021, Tether reached a settlement with the NY AG’s office over accusations of providing misleading information about its reserves and losses. To address these concerns, Tether handed over documents such as letters, bank accounts, reserve holdings, and wallet addresses through the law firm Steptoe.Attestation reportTether’s latest attestation report for Q1 2023, released on May 10, offered further details about its reserves. According to the report, Tether’s reserves were valued at $81.8 billion at the end of the quarter, a significant increase from the earlier period of $14.8 billion. These reserves consisted of $53 billion in US Treasuries, $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, and $5.3 billion in loans described as “over-collateralized.”The disclosure of Tether’s previous backing by Chinese securities adds another layer of complexity to the stablecoin landscape, raising questions about the risk exposure and potential impact on the stability of these digital assets. Using Chinese commercial paper to back a US dollar stablecoin is a risky endeavor.It raises the same issues as we’ve seen with the plethora of crypto lenders that went bankrupt in 2022. In those cases, they were using customer money to speculate and turn a profit. That’s fine when it works but when it goes wrong, it is customers who suffer. In its defense, Tether has stated that it only held A1 rated banking sector Chinese commercial paper in 2022 in state-owned Chinese companies like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. It reduced this exposure to zero later that year.With the cryptocurrency community and regulators seeking greater transparency and accountability, the industry is likely to face increased scrutiny and calls for enhanced regulations to ensure the integrity of stablecoin operations moving forward.As regulators continue to assess and navigate the evolving crypto market, it remains to be seen how the industry will address these concerns and establish clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers to ensure the trust and confidence of market participants.