Official Says Hong Kong Should Invest in Web3 Economy

KDIC Seizes Crypto from Debtors Linked to Losses at Financial FirmsDuring the first half of this year, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) tracked the cryptocurrency holdings of 1,075 individuals and debtors responsible for causing losses at financial entities, including savings banks, according to documents obtained by local news outlet Herald Economy, from the office of lawmaker Kim Han-kyu, a member of the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee. From this scrutiny, KDIC identified 29 wrongful cases and proceeded to confiscate cryptocurrencies in 16 of those instances.KDIC is a semi-state body that has been instrumental in tracing and recovering assets from culpable employees at troubled financial firms and debtors in arrears. Meanwhile, methods for hiding wealth have become more sophisticated, typically unfolding behind the curtain.Photo by Georg Bommeli on UnsplashFirst crypto seizureOut of these individuals, 900 had taken out loans of at least KRW 3 billion ($2.2 million) from beleaguered financial institutions, while the remaining 175 were employees of these institutions, held responsible for their failures. This occasion represents the KDIC’s first seizure of virtual assets.Until recently, the KDIC struggled to reclaim hidden assets funneled into cryptocurrency exchanges, given their limited authority to seek documentation. KDIC’s purview mainly extended to requesting information from public institutions, banks, insurance companies, and securities firms. However, KDIC has now found a way to seize crypto assets by investigating the bank accounts linked to these exchanges. In Korea, crypto exchanges facilitating Korean won trades are legally mandated to secure real-name accounts from banks.Call for expanding KDIC’s authorityGiven the evidence of using cryptocurrencies to conceal wealth, many suggest that amendments to the Depositor Protection Act are necessary, enabling KDIC to directly request relevant data from exchanges and recover more hidden assets effectively.Furthermore in August KDIC secured a court order allowing them to liquidate these assets. Following this successful confiscation, the debtors’ cryptocurrencies have been frozen in their wallets, rendering them unresponsive to any market shifts. Discussions are now underway regarding the method of liquidating the debtors’ cryptocurrencies at market value on exchanges. This includes deliberations on whether KDIC will assume ownership of the cryptocurrencies and directly proceed with their sale.In a chat with Herald Economy, Lawmaker Kim emphasized the need for KDIC to have the authority to access information from virtual asset service providers. This would enable them to more effectively retrieve assets from responsible debtors. Kim further stated that such steps would enhance both the efficiency of debt collection and overall market fairness.

Report: Can Bitcoin Replace Gold As a Safe Asset?In light of the substantial increase in Bitcoin (BTC) prices this year, a report from KB Financial Group in South Korea examined the potential for BTC to replace gold as a safe asset.©Pexels/Michael SteinbergThe study delves into the factors behind the recent BTC price surge and emphasizes the need for caution when considering BTC as an alternative to traditional safe assets.3 drivers behind BTC surgeFrom January 1 to March 31 this year, BTC experienced an impressive return of 71%. This surge can be attributed to three main factors: an anticipated increase in liquidity due to market expectations of unchanged or falling interest rates; central banks supplying liquidity to mitigate risks in the traditional banking system; and concerns over the potential delisting of cryptocurrencies should the US court’s decision on the Ripple-SEC case classify XRP, Ripple’s native token, as securities, prompting investors to shift their focus to BTC.The report suggests that the current BTC boom is more likely a result of short-term arbitrages and social conformity, given the greater information asymmetry in the crypto market, which lacks the disclosure system present in traditional stock markets.Persisting risk factorsLast month, blockchain tracker Whale Alert spotted a transfer of 11,125 BTC from an anonymous address to Binance. The primary reason for moving assets from a private address to an exchange address is to sell them, indicating that investors should keep a watchful eye on Bitcoin trading volumes, particularly for any signs of large sell-offs.Data from the crypto data analysis platform Glassnode revealed that the percentage of the BTC supply that was active over a year ago reached an all-time high of 68% in late March. Historically, such an increase has been associated with falling BTC prices.This year, the BTC supply is set to grow due to the US government’s liquidation of seized BTC. As detailed in a March 31 Cointelegraph article, the US government seized 51,352 BTC in a case related to Ross Ulbricht, the creator of the online black market Silk Road. The government has already sold 9,861 BTC, with the remaining amount expected to be liquidated in four additional portions throughout the year.Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume, has been struggling to find banks in the US to store client funds after crypto-friendly banks Silvergate and Signature closed their doors.Need for cautionAlthough various media sources often portray BTC as a safe asset, the report advises caution in accepting these claims. Although some liken BTC to “digital gold,” the two assets share little in common beyond their finite and scarce nature. In fact, gold and BTC diverge significantly in terms of social consensus, intrinsic value, price volatility, and investor protection.Gold serves as a highly liquid asset with applications in both jewelry and industrial goods, in addition to its role as an investment vehicle. In contrast, BTC’s intrinsic value is still debatable. The price volatility of BTC is also a concern, as evidenced by its 71% spike in the first quarter of 2023, compared to gold’s modest 8% increase. Additionally, gold investment products are regulated by law, whereas BTC is not. The report thus recommends treating BTC as a high-risk product and incorporating it into a diverse investment portfolio.It is worth noting that since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the crypto market has demonstrated a stronger correlation with the global stock market in response to negative signals. This trend can be partially attributed to the growing presence of institutional investors in the crypto market, who often sell risky assets first to secure liquidity in the face of unexpected shocks.

Hong Kong's spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) encountered their second day of net outflows since their launch on April 30. According to data published by crypto trading data platform SoSo Value, in excess of 90 BTC exited the Hong Kong ETFs on May 9. The data indicated that China Asset Management's spot Bitcoin ETF observed an outflow of 80.16 BTC, while the Bosera HashKey Bitcoin ETF recorded a lesser outflow of 10 BTC. Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s third spot Bitcoin ETF offered by Harvest Global registered zero flows.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashThese daily net outflows follow a trend of net inflows that had developed in the preceding days, with the three ETFs collectively witnessing net inflows of 101.6 BTC on Wednesday and 99.99 BTC on Tuesday. As of Thursday, the three ETFs, managed by ChinaAMC, Harvest Global and Bosera with HashKey, held approximately 4,260 Bitcoin, with total net assets reaching $261.45 million, marking an increase from $247.7 million on the first day of trading. The total trading volume for the three ETFs amounted to $2.06 million on Thursday, a decline from $2.67 million the day prior and a significant drop from the $9.74 million recorded on April 30, according to SosoValue data. This recent outflow represents the second day of net outflows from these products since their launch on April 30.   The initial day of outflows occurred on May 6, with 75.36 BTC flowing out of the products. This marked the first setback for Hong Kong's Bitcoin ETFs following their launch on April 30.  The outflows on that occasion primarily stemmed from the China Asset Management Bitcoin ETF, while other Hong Kong-based products saw no flows. Potential Stock Connect additionMany commentators had expected these Hong Kong-based products to see inflows from mainland China. While that hasn’t materialized yet, Harvest Global CEO Han Tongli said that he doesn’t rule out the addition of its Bitcoin and Ether ETF products to Stock Connect.  Shanghai Hong Kong Stock Connect is a cross border investment channel that would open access to these products to investors that ordinarily invest in and trade products and equities listed within the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSEC). Tongli made the suggestion to the South China Morning Post (SCMP)  while attending the Bitcoin Asia conference. He suggested that such an addition is a possibility if all goes smoothly over the course of the next two years. U.S. product outflowsIn the U.S., spot Bitcoin ETFs also saw net outflows on Thursday, amounting to $11.29 million. Farside data indicates that the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) witnessed a substantial $43.4 million redemption, marking its largest single-day outflow since May 2, totaling $17.5 billion in outflows overall. BlackRock’s IBIT has now accumulated $15.4 billion in total inflows. Additionally, other top-performing ETFs — Bitwise (BITB), Fidelity (FBTC) and ARK (ARKB) — also experienced inflows. In total, U.S. ETFs have witnessed $11.7 billion in cumulative net inflows.