Top

NVT Ratio Signals Overvalued BTC

Markets·April 12, 2023, 3:35 AM

The network value to transaction (NVT) ratio of Bitcoin, which has been staying at a high level since the beginning of the year, has signaled its overvaluation, according to Yonhap Infomax.

However, some argue that this will not necessarily lead to a crypto winter, considering that the nature of Bitcoin as an asset has changed and there is no sign of overheating in other indicators.

BTC coin
©Pexels/Pixabay

 

Price and NVT ratio correlation

Yonhap Infomax found out that the correlation between the NVT ratio and the price of Bitcoin over the past six years is -0.35. A value of 1 represents a completely positive correlation, while a value of -1 represents a completely negative correlation.

Extending this period to 2010 makes the correlation close to 0, but during the early years, NVT ratios showed high volatility, shooting up to four digits. Such a high volatility doesn’t suggest much correlation. Until 2021, there was a high correlation of up to -0.44.

The NVT ratio is calculated by dividing the market cap by the transacted volume. Conceptually, it is similar to the price-to-earnings ratio for the stock market.

In 2017, when the crypto market was bullish, the average Bitcoin NVT ratio was 7.3. This number became 8.7 in 2021 when the market experienced a similar pattern. In retrospect, single-digit NVT ratios usually hint at bullish markets.

This year so far, Bitcoin has been relatively overvalued, given that the average NVT ratio is 23.6.

 

BTC price recovery

When the crypto market sentiment lost its confidence due to the FTX bankruptcy last year, the price of Bitcoin went down to $15,000. It later recovered to the near $30,000 level. The Bitcoin price once had reached an all-time high in 2021, surpassing $65,000.

The years that manifested similar patterns as this year were 2018 and 2019. In those years, the Bitcoin NVT ratio plateaued around 20.

 

Uncertain outlook

The NVT ratio itself could point to a possible crypto winter, but researchers say it’s hard to say.

Jang Kyung-pil, a research analyst at crypto data platform Xangle, said that people now consider Bitcoin as a store of value rather than a means of transactions, pointing out that BTC’s market value to realized value (MVRV) ratio has hit the bottom at 0.84 and now reached 1.4. According to Jang, MVRV values under 1 indicate undervaluation and those above 3 indicate overvaluation.

Jung Seok-moon, head of the research center at crypto exchange Korbit, said that the current NVT ratio signals BTC overvaluation. He added that the Fed is likely to turn dovish in its monetary policy, which would prompt a strong BTC uptrend.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 01, 2023

Binance APAC Head Resigns Amid Regulatory Challenges

Binance APAC Head Resigns Amid Regulatory ChallengesThe uncertainty swirling around Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, continues as Binance Head of Asia Pacific (APAC), Leon Foong, has resigned from his position.The resignation was reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, with the publication citing people familiar with the matter. Foong played a pivotal role in expanding Binance’s reach across markets like South Korea, Thailand, and Japan.Photo by Marten Bjork on UnsplashRecent pattern of executive exitsFoong’s departure is the latest one in a series of high-profile exits in recent months. Chief Strategy Officer Patrick Hillman and General Counsel Hon Ng are among those who have previously left, as regulatory authorities worldwide tighten their grip on Binance.Binance has been navigating a challenging period as regulatory crackdowns sweep across the global crypto space, prompting strategic shifts and senior leadership changes. Foong’s departure may also signify the company’s effort to realign itself in the face of mounting scrutiny.Market share under pressureThe regulatory backlash has not only led to senior leadership changes but has also impacted Binance’s market share. As authorities have clamped down on Binance due to alleged violations, the exchange’s dominance in the crypto trading market has diminished.Losses of key banking partnerships have compelled some customers to migrate to rival platforms. In some cases, Binance has simply been forced to retreat entirely from offering services in certain jurisdictions.Over the course of a period of three months earlier this year, the company lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Cyprus. French authorities are investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.In recent days, the global exchange platform has also come under pressure relative to the service it extends to Russian users. A Wall Street Journal exposé published last week alleged that Binance’s activities in Russia were in breach of sanctions imposed by the United States. Binance responded by removing the option for customers to transact over the platform using two sanctioned banks. It’s now understood that the company is considering going a step further and exiting that market entirely.LawsuitsBinance’s legal woes began with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filing a lawsuit against the exchange, along with its billionaire Founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ). The lawsuit alleged violations of derivatives regulations and criticized the firm’s compliance procedures. Binance reacted by expressing surprise and disappointment over the legal action.The challenges continued with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing a lawsuit against Binance and CZ in June, accusing the exchange of running unregistered exchanges and engaging in various other violations. Binance has consistently contested these allegations from both the CFTC and the SEC.In response to these challenges, CZ took to X (formerly Twitter) in July to reaffirm the exchange’s commitment to growth despite the setbacks.More concern has been created due to the recent filing by the SEC of a motion “under seal” in its case against Binance. That option is usually taken to prevent public knowledge of sensitive information, which possibly could relate to a parallel investigation from the US Justice Department.There’s likely to be no letup in the cloud that hangs over the business until all enforcement actions and lawsuits have run their course.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Nov 25, 2025

Regulators clamp down on crypto energy as nations shift priorities

The blockchain network underpinning Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, requires an energy volume comparable to the annual consumption of Thailand. According to Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index, the protocol utilized roughly 204.44 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity between Nov. 18, 2024, and Nov. 18, 2025.Photo by Fré Sonneveld on UnsplashFiscal losses drive Malaysian oversightAmid these intense energy demands, Malaysia’s primary electricity utility has recorded substantial financial impairments attributed to illicit activities. Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) reported losses totaling 4.57 billion ringgit ($1.1 billion) from illegal crypto-mining operations over a five-year span. In a Nov. 19 report by The Edge Malaysia, the Ministry of Energy Transition and Water Transformation (Petra) disclosed these figures to parliament, specifying that the unauthorized mining occurred at 13,827 locations between 2020 and August of this year. To counter these infractions through regulatory channels, Petra has formed a special committee scheduled to convene before year-end. This body aims to recommend enhancements to the Electricity Supply Act, which currently delineates penalties based on the offender's classification. Domestic violators face fines ranging from 1,000 to 50,000 ringgit ($240 to $12,000), imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Penalties escalate for non-domestic entities, involving fines between 20,000 and one million ringgit ($480 to $240,000) and potential prison terms of up to five years. Despite these provisions regarding electricity theft, a specific legal code regulating the act of crypto mining remains absent, creating a jurisdictional void. International bans and grid reallocationStrategies to curtail electricity usage by crypto miners are becoming evident elsewhere in Southeast Asia as well. Laotian Deputy Energy Minister Chanthaboun Soukaloun told Reuters last month that the nation intends to suspend electricity supplies to crypto miners by early 2026. He cited the sector's minimal economic contribution and low job creation as primary factors. Consequently, the state plans to redirect power to high-priority sectors, including AI data centers, metals processing, and electric-vehicle manufacturing. Parallel restrictions are emerging globally. In October, the government of British Columbia enacted a permanent prohibition on new BC Hydro connections for crypto miners to safeguard the Canadian province’s energy reserves. Officials pointed to the industry’s "disproportionate energy consumption and limited economic benefit" as the rationale for the policy. The debate over thermal innovationConversely, some enterprises are exploring methods to capture thermal output from Bitcoin mining to heat residential and commercial properties. If viable, such repurposing could utilize the considerable thermal byproducts of mining. A K33 Research study cited by CNBC indicates the industry generates roughly 100 TWh of heat annually, a figure sufficient to warm the entirety of Finland. However, industry consensus on the feasibility of these applications remains elusive. Proponents suggest that mining infrastructure could be situated in proximity to heat consumers. Skeptics, however, contend that the reliance on application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chips makes this impractical, arguing that the technical difficulty of mining a block renders household participation unfeasible. Despite these differing views, the concept continues to attract attention as a potential avenue for innovation in energy distribution. As jurisdictions like Malaysia and British Columbia tighten regulatory oversight, the cryptocurrency sector faces mounting pressure to address its energy footprint. The divergence between government restrictions and industry-led efficiency proposals underscores the complex relationship between digital asset infrastructure and global energy resources. Given the shifting landscape of policy and technology, the outlook for sustainable large-scale crypto mining remains uncertain, as governments weigh energy demands against economic benefits and the industry searches for more efficient ways to operate.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jul 04, 2023

Hong Kong Embraces Web3 Development with Dedicated Task Force

Hong Kong Embraces Web3 Development with Dedicated Task ForceHong Kong has taken another step towards embracing the potential growth of the crypto industry by creating a dedicated task force for Web3 development.Led by Financial Secretary Paul Chan, the task force, which was announced on Friday, consists of 15 non-official members, including university professors and entrepreneurs. As official members, government officials and financial regulators are involved.Financial Secretary Chan expressed his optimism about blockchain technology, the foundation of Web3, highlighting its potential for innovation through features such as disintermediation, security, transparency, and cost-efficiency. The task force envisions Web3 as a solution to challenges faced in sectors like finance, trade, business operations, and everyday life.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashMulti-agency participationNotable members of the task force include the CEOs of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing. Their presence demonstrates the commitment of top finance regulators in Hong Kong to the Web3 initiative. Additionally, Yat Siu, chairman of metaverse firm Animoca Brands, joins as a non-official member, bringing diverse perspectives to the table.Financial Secretary Chan emphasized Hong Kong’s ambition to become a significant player in the Web3 space. The city-state aims to support companies and nurture local talent within the ecosystem. This initiative aligns with Hong Kong’s long-term vision for crypto development, as set out in a policy document released last October. It’s the latest in a whole series of measures officials have taken since then to further that crypto ambition.Strategic positioningBy establishing the Web3 task force, Hong Kong seeks to position itself as a prominent hub for crypto activities. The city-state recognizes the potential economic benefits and job opportunities associated with the crypto industry. The task force’s diverse composition reflects the government’s intention to collaborate with stakeholders from various sectors and gather insights from academia, government bodies, and industry experts.Furthermore, the task force aims to create a supportive environment for digital asset development. Hong Kong’s financial regulators have been actively working on regulatory frameworks to ensure investor protection and promote market integrity.While it is still in the early stages, global crypto exchanges like Huobi, OKX, and BitMEX have recently expressed their intentions to establish a presence in Hong Kong. This indicates growing interest in the city-state’s crypto potential and validates the government’s efforts to position Hong Kong as a welcoming and conducive environment for crypto-related businesses.With its commitment to fostering digital asset development, Hong Kong demonstrates a forward-thinking approach to leverage the benefits of blockchain technology and position itself as a thriving ecosystem for Web3 innovation.The collaboration between academic, governmental, and regulatory stakeholders sets the stage for the Chinese autonomous territory to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the evolving crypto space. Hong Kong’s proactive stance and the establishment of the Web3 task force reinforce its position as a global financial hub and a front-runner in embracing emerging technologies for future economic growth.

news
Loading