Alchemy Pay Gearing Up for Expansion into South Korea

Subreddit Token Price Slide Following SurgeReddit’s subreddit community tokens, Moon and Brick, having experienced a remarkable surge in prices last week fueled by a significant increase in trading volume, have taken a downward trajectory, plummeting in price.Photo by Mike Petrucci on UnsplashCrypto.com token listingThe Moon token, associated with Reddit’s r/CryptoCurrency community boasting over 6.5 million members, shot up from approximately $0.09 to nearly $0.58 on July 19, just after Singapore trading platform Crypto.com listed the token.Concurrently, trading volume spiked to around $3 million on Wednesday, marking an impressive boost.Similarly, the Fortnite subreddit community token, Brick, which Crypto.com distributes as a reward to contributors of r/Fortnite, also witnessed a substantial price surge. The token’s value surged from $0.01 on July 17 to approximately $0.10 on July 19, according to data from CoinGecko.Surge acknowledgedIn response to the sudden price surges, Crypto.com released a note early on Monday, acknowledging the surge both tokens had experienced recently. However, in a swift turn of events, both tokens experienced a significant downturn in the past 24 hours, with their prices plummeting by over 20%.As of midday (ET) on Monday, Moon was trading at $0.33, while Brick was valued just under $0.05, as reported by CoinGecko data. Moreover, trading volumes for both tokens have significantly contracted during this period of volatility. Moon’s volume shrank from over $1 million on July 23 to approximately $200,000 on Monday. On the other hand, Brick’s volume saw an even more drastic decrease, falling from approximately $210,000 on July 23 to a mere $26,000 on Monday.Terms of service changeMarket analysts speculate that the recent change in Reddit’s Terms of Service might have been the catalyst for the initial price increases. Reddit’s alteration of its Terms of Service on July 16 to permit users to trade community tokens and avatars potentially triggered the surge in token prices. It appears that Web2 centralized virtual goods such as coins and awards are making way for tradable Web3 community points.Speculating on the token price surge, Bobby Ong, the Co-Founder and COO of Malaysia-headquartered cryptocurrency data aggregator CoinGecko, wrote via Twitter last week: “Both tokens increased at the speculation of the changes coming at Reddit. No one knows exactly what is happening but Reddit deprecating Web2 Coins & Awards while allowing trading of their Web3 CPs could be something to monitor in the coming months.”Despite the recent downturn, the overall crypto space remains highly dynamic and unpredictable. Events such as the listing of tokens on prominent trading platforms can cause rapid price fluctuations. As always, that scenario makes it essential for investors to approach these assets with caution.While Moon and Brick may have encountered a sharp decline, the cryptocurrency market, in general, has proven its resilience and ability to rebound with Bitcoin currently holding a unit price of $29,125. As the market continues to evolve and gain wider acceptance, investors will need to continue to exercise caution and consider the volatility inherent in digital assets.

Korea to Ban Virtual Asset Deposit Services from Next JulyDuring a recent criminal law seminar held at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Park Min-woo, Director of the Capital Markets Bureau at the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), underscored that starting next year, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will no longer be permitted to offer deposit and management services for virtual assets. That’s according to a report by local crypto news outlet Digital Asset.This is seen as a response to the suspension of virtual asset deposits and withdrawals carried out by virtual asset yield platforms Haru Invest and Delio a few months ago.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashLegal backgroundDirector Park referred to Article 7, Paragraph 2 of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, clarifying that the intention behind this provision is to ensure that VASPs have the ability to fulfill asset withdrawal requests, even in the scenario where all their customers make such requests. This Act is scheduled to go into effect in July of next year, and Article 7 prohibits VASPs from entrusting customer assets to third parties.Deposit service providers receive cryptocurrency deposits and then distribute the resulting yields to their customers. In a bull market, these entities can manage yields on their own. However, in a flat or bear market, these asset managers may face challenges in paying yields unless they can generate profits by handing over customer assets to external custodians.Signs of giving upIn fact, centralized finance (CeFi) company HeyBit made an announcement last month, stating that it will discontinue its virtual asset deposit service starting from October 2. They cited this specific provision as the reason for their decision.Fraud chargesBoth Haru and Delio have been indicted by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office on fraud charges.As an unregistered VASP, Haru suspended its deposit and withdrawal services on multiple occasions in June, causing substantial financial losses to numerous investors. This suspension was triggered by significant losses incurred at B&S Holdings, another unregistered entity to which Haru had entrusted virtual assets.Similarly, Delio, although registered, entrusted a considerable amount of virtual assets to Haru and Traum Info Tech but was unable to recover them.

Zipmex proposes creditor repayments of 3 cents on the dollarBeleaguered Singaporean crypto exchange Zipmex has unveiled a restructuring proposal aimed at repaying creditors. According to a report published by Bloomberg on Wednesday, the initial offer stands at 3.35 cents for every dollar of the creditors’ claims.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashRestructuring challengesThis restructuring proposal unfolds against the backdrop of a challenging period for Zipmex, triggered by the aftermath of last year’s crypto price downturn. The crypto exchange, which operates in Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and Singapore, is currently undergoing a court-supervised restructuring process based in Singapore.In its efforts to restructure the business, Zipmex is grappling with a debt of $97.1 million. That total debt level is contingent upon the eventual recovery of assets. Bloomberg cited sources familiar with the matter, suggesting that depending on the success of these recovery efforts, the repayment figure could potentially surge to 29.35 cents per dollar.Creditor dissatisfactionHowever, not all major creditors are on board with Zipmex’s proposed plan. Expressing reservations, they are pushing for an independent review to scrutinize recent changes in the company’s assets and liabilities, as outlined in an Oct. 4 court document. This external examination is deemed crucial to ensuring transparency and fairness throughout the restructuring process.In response to these developments, Marcus Lim, the Group Chief Executive Officer of Zipmex, refrained from providing detailed comments due to the confidentiality of the ongoing arrangement. While acknowledging inaccuracies in information sourced from external outlets, he chose not to elaborate on them further.Investor deal failureA previous attempt to sell Zipmex to V Ventures, a subsidiary of Thoresen Thai Agencies, fell through. To add to the struggling company’s woes, it emerged earlier this week that Thailand’s securities regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently instructed Zipmex to halt operations in the country due to insufficient net capital.The company had been fined 11 million baht ($315,000) by the SEC earlier this year. The SEC cited the co-mingling of corporate and customer funds as one regulatory breach. Furthermore, the Thai regulator claimed that between May and July 2022, Zipmex “did not have in place a system to effectively prevent conflicts of interest in such matters and the business operation does not have an adequate risk control system.”In response to this recent regulatory directive, Zipmex Limited issued a statement to its customers, expressing its commitment to ensuring proper and compliant business operations in line with the criteria set by the Thai SEC. Consequently, the temporary suspension of digital asset trading and deposit of all types was deemed necessary.The intricacies of Zipmex’s financial restructuring will be closely watched by market observers, especially considering the volatility in the crypto market and the regulatory challenges faced by the company in multiple jurisdictions. The success of the proposed repayment plan, contingent upon asset recovery, remains uncertain, leaving creditors and industry stakeholders on edge.As Zipmex grapples with these multifaceted challenges, its future trajectory hinges on navigating both the demands of the bankruptcy process alongside regulatory requirements.