Tether fueling Cambodia’s dark economy despite ban

Cryptocurrencies tied to the family of U.S. President Donald Trump began trading on South Korea’s major exchanges on Monday. Upbit, the country’s largest exchange, listed WLFI—the native token of World Liberty Financial, a DeFi platform backed by the Trump family—and World Liberty Financial USD (USD1), a stablecoin the platform says is pegged 1:1 to the U.S. dollar and backed by dollars and government money market funds. Bithumb also listed both WLFI and USD1, while Coinone listed WLFI only.Photo by Scottsdale Mint on UnsplashFrom global listings to a volatile debutWLFI’s first session was volatile. It opened on Upbit at a floor price of 433.76 won ($0.31) and, roughly 17 hours later, was down about 25% at 323 won ($0.23) at the time of publication.Source: WLFI/KRW spot trading pair on UpbitThe Korean launch comes alongside listings on major global venues, including Binance and Coinbase. Until its exchange listings, WLFI holders had been unable to trade their tokens. The Wall Street Journal estimated the Trump family’s holdings, representing less than a quarter of the supply, to be worth close to $5 billion after the listing. Trump’s three sons are named as co-founders of World Liberty, which says tokens allocated to founders and team members will remain locked. President Trump is described as the project’s “co-founder emeritus.” Political controversy over crypto and holdingsThe project has drawn criticism from those who argue it could serve as a conduit for influence, with partners and investors seeking political favor. In April, Democratic lawmakers Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Maxine Waters warned the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the family’s stake posed “an unprecedented conflict of interest” in oversight of the crypto industry. Later, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “Neither the President nor his family have ever engaged, or will ever engage, in conflicts of interest.” Controversy over public officials’ crypto exposure is not new. Recently, it was reported by The Chosun Ilbo that as of Aug. 14, Lee Eog-weon, nominee to chair South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC), held 10 shares of Strategy, a Nasdaq-listed Bitcoin treasury company with 632,457 BTC in reserves. The disclosure indicates no legal violation because the holdings predate his nomination, but it highlights tension with his public views. In a letter to parliament ahead of his confirmation hearing, Lee questioned crypto’s intrinsic value and argued its volatility undermines its utility as a store of value or medium of exchange. If Lee were not seeking a government post, his holdings of crypto-related stocks would hardly surprise South Koreans. According to Money Today, citing data from the Korea Securities Depository (KSD), Korean investors increased purchases of crypto-related U.S. equities amid expectations of U.S. rate cuts. Bitmine Immersion Technologies—a Bitcoin miner that also accumulates Ethereum as a treasury asset—was the second-most purchased U.S. stock by Koreans in August, with net buys of $252.77 million, or 7.6% of all purchases among the top 50 U.S. stocks. Stablecoin issuer Circle ranked 10th at $92.62 million, and the GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF, which delivers twice the daily price movement of Coinbase, ranked 11th at $90.74 million. In total, crypto-related stocks and ETFs accounted for 30.4% of the top 50 U.S. equity holdings by value. South Korea weighs spot ETFs amid investor surgePolicy is moving in tandem with market interest. Spot crypto ETFs have recently been elevated to South Korea’s national agenda, opening the door to potential approval. Analysts say such products could repatriate demand that has been flowing overseas. Kim Jin-young of Kiwoom Securities argues that expanded regulatory approval could reshape Korea’s capital market by widening investor access, drawing in institutional capital, stabilizing prices, and diversifying available crypto-linked products. 

FTX, the failed cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, has taken legal action by filing a lawsuit against four former employees of Salameda, a Hong Kong-based affiliate closely linked to the exchange’s former CEO.According to a Delaware bankruptcy court filing in the United States on Thursday, the lawsuit alleges that five individuals exploited their personal connections to prioritize their asset withdrawals from FTX during a period of uncertainty regarding the exchange’s stability. The defendants in question are Salameda’s former employees — Michael Burgess, Matthew Burgess, Kevin Nguyen, and Darren Wong — as well as Michael and Matthew’s mother, Lesley Burgess, and two companies: 3Twelve Ventures and BDK Consulting.Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash Preference period clawbackThe critical withdrawals occurred within the 90-day period leading up to FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, commonly referred to as the “Preference Period.” Under US law, customers who withdrew their crypto assets during this timeframe could potentially face lawsuits from the exchange’s creditors seeking to recover these funds, a process known as a “clawback” under bankruptcy regulations.The total value of these suspicious transfers is estimated at $157.3 million, with more than $123 million of that sum withdrawn after November 7, 2022. Michael Burgess is alleged to have received around $73 million of these illicit withdrawals.The lawsuit claims that the individuals leveraged their connections within FTX Group to ensure preferential treatment over other customers. In a specific accusation, Matthew Burgess is said to have engaged other FTX Group employees to expedite certain withdrawal requests from his FTX US exchange accounts while falsely representing the accounts as his own. 11th hour withdrawalsIn this way, Burgess and the other four defendants managed to get funds out when most other FTX customers couldn’t. The final withdrawals were executed only hours before FTX.com suspended all withdrawals on November 8, 2022, according to the lawsuit. As one commentator on X put it, “FTX employees were manually reviewing large withdrawals & pushing some ahead.”The legal filing also delves into the significant profits the defendants reportedly accrued from trading cryptocurrencies in the months leading up to FTX’s collapse. Even after their apparent departure from the FTX Group, Michael Burgess, Nguyen, and Wong actively traded through entities such as 3Twelve and BDK, with monthly trading volumes ranging from $100 million to $400 million.A noteworthy aspect of this activity is that their trading capital was allegedly derived from the FTX Group. The court filing goes on to claim that “Burgess, Nguyen and Wong received substantial transfers of digital assets and fiat currency from exchange accounts associated with FTX Group entities, including approximately 13.1 million FTT sent to Darren Wong, more than 1 million SOL sent to Michael Burgess, and nearly $4 million USD for ‘bonuses’ between Michael Burgess, Nguyen and Wong.” Retail clawback riskThis legal battle and the allegations against the former Salameda employees are being watched closely by other FTX bankruptcy stakeholders. The FTX Debtor has suggested that it will pursue clawbacks vigorously. That has concerned former retail customers who managed to withdraw assets in the final days before the platform collapsed. Equally, it is a worry for current FTX creditors who may have withdrawn some but not all of their assets before the exchange was shuttered.

Qatar Criticized for Regulatory Inaction Against Crypto CompaniesThe Qatari Central Bank (QCB) has come under fire from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for its lack of efforts in enforcing regulations that prohibit virtual asset service providers.In a report released earlier this week, the global watchdog for money laundering and terrorist financing highlighted the need for Qatar to enhance its capabilities in effectively combating evolving forms of criminal activity, including taking action against virtual asset service providers.Photo by Akbar Nemati on PexelsContinuous improvement neededAlthough acknowledging “substantive improvements” applied to its control system, the FATF report emphasized that Qatar must further improve its understanding of more complex forms of money laundering and terrorist financing.While Qatar has shown positive progress in gathering beneficial ownership information through its unified register, which consolidates data on its citizens, the FATF report emphasized the need for stronger controls to ensure the accuracy and currency of the collected information. The report also criticized Qatar’s authorities for underutilizing their sophisticated analysis capabilities in identifying instances of money laundering.Lack of control despite VASP banDespite the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority’s (QFCRA) announcement in December 2019 that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not allowed within or from the Qatar Financial Centre, the country’s regulatory authority has made little progress in penalizing firms that facilitate or provide crypto asset services.Interestingly, while Qatar has banned virtual asset service providers, it has expressed interest in exploring the potential use cases of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In June 2022, it was reported that the QCB is in the early stages of developing a CBDC.Sheikh Bandar bin Mohammed bin Saoud Al Thani, the governor of Qatar’s central bank, revealed that the QCB is evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of CBDCs and determining the appropriate technology and platform.As the country explores the potential of a CBDC, it must ensure that its regulatory framework aligns with international standards and best practices. By doing so, Qatar can strike a balance between fostering innovation in the digital currency space and safeguarding its financial system from illicit activities.Global coordinationThrough the Paris-based money-laundering watchdog, and calls from the G7, the European Central Bank, and others to regulate on a global basis, the official response to controlling digital assets and VASPs is becoming more globally coordinated. Central bankers and government officials have learned that decentralized finance has the ability to be borderless.FATF has been active in getting more countries on board. Effective from Thursday, Japan now implements FATF’s “travel rule” with respect to digital assets. That action was taken following a FATF finding that Japan wasn’t following best practice relative to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. Pakistan recently banned cryptocurrencies in an effort that appears to have been motivated by wanting to stay off the FATF’s gray list of non-compliant countries.While Pakistan managed to get itself off that list, the United Arab Emirates found itself on the gray list. The UAE’s Central Bank issued guidance on AML relative to virtual asset companies, in an effort to come back into FATF compliance.It remains to be seen how Qatar will respond to the FATF’s critique and whether it will take concrete actions to address the concerns raised. The international community will be closely monitoring Qatar’s efforts to combat financial crimes in the virtual asset sector and to establish a robust regulatory framework for its future CBDC endeavors.