Wintermute Asia executes inaugural options block trade via CME

Sony Bank, a Japanese neobank headquartered in Tokyo, has applied to the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish a new trust bank, Connectia Trust, as part of a broader expansion into digital assets. According to Sony Bank’s application, if approved, Connectia Trust would issue U.S. dollar–pegged stablecoins and manage the corresponding reserves. The entity would also offer non-fiduciary custody of digital assets and provide fiduciary asset-management services for certain affiliates.Photo by P. L. on UnsplashSony among 11 crypto applicants to the OCCSony Bank’s filing is among 11 crypto-related applications before the OCC, alongside efforts by Coinbase, Nubank, Paxos, BitGo, Ripple, and others. To date, only two banks have advanced through the agency’s charter approval process. In 2021, the OCC conditionally approved the conversion of Anchorage Trust Company into Anchorage Digital Bank, granting it a national trust bank charter. More recently, last week, Erebor Bank, backed by PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, received preliminary conditional approval for its de novo charter. The initiative reflects Japan’s growing openness to cryptocurrencies, underscored by the government’s recent regulatory approval of the country’s first yen-denominated stablecoin. Fintech firm JPYC Inc. plans to launch “JPYC” this fall, pegged at 1 yen per token and designed for person-to-person transfers and retail payments, with plans for point-of-sale integration. The issuer targets up to 10 trillion yen ($66.7 billion) in circulation within three years. There are no limits on holdings or wallet transfers, while redemptions are capped at 1 million yen ($6,700) per user per day. Sony Bank has been building its Web3 capabilities this year. Its board approved a new subsidiary for blockchain initiatives in May, later renamed BlockBloom in August. Now operational, BlockBloom aims to connect fans and artists and bridge digital and physical experiences, as well as fiat and digital assets. Its ultimate parent, Sony Group, launched a blockchain mainnet called Soneium in January through Sony Block Solutions Labs, S.BLOX, and SNFT. Built as an Ethereum layer-2 network powered by Optimism’s Superchain technology, Soneium recently announced support for meco.fun, a SocialFi platform that enables creators to earn through memes, content, and NFTs. MUFG’s blockchain initiatives at home and abroadJapan’s top traditional banks are also expanding their involvement in digital assets, with a growing focus on stablecoins. An Oct. 17 Nikkei report, cited by CoinDesk, said Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, and Mizuho Financial Group aim to develop a unified system to issue and transfer stablecoins among corporate clients. Their first rollout will focus on yen-pegged tokens, followed by a potential dollar-based offering. According to an earlier report from Reuters, MUFG and nine other major international banks, including Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, and UBS, are collaborating on stablecoins tied to G7 currencies. MUFG has additionally rolled out a blockchain-based business with Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities (MUMSS), which is offering bond security tokens and operating ASTOMO, a trading venue for retail investors that has debuted with tokens backed by real estate. The platform lets users invest from 100,000 yen (about $667) on their phones. In summer, MUFG’s trust unit, Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking, acquired a high-rise building in Osaka for more than 100 billion yen ($667 million), with plans to issue digital securities tied to the asset. The tokenization strategy would offer fractional ownership to retail investors long excluded from major real estate opportunities. Taken together, Sony Bank’s OCC application and Japan’s accelerating tokenization efforts signal a race among major financial and technology players to build compliant, scalable infrastructure for digital assets—both at home and abroad. 

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

In Malaysia local regulator the Securities Commission has ordered global crypto exchange platform Bybit to shut down its operations within Malaysia as part of enforcement actions being taken by the regulator against the company.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashOperating without registration The Securities Commission published a statement to its website late last week outlining that both Bybit and its CEO Ben Zhou had been reprimanded for carrying out digital asset trading activities in Malaysia without having completed the necessary registration. The regulator also pointed out that both Zhou and his company have been listed on its Investor Alert List since July 2021. The Securities Commission took the opportunity to remind investors that they should only deal with what it termed “Recognized Market Operators” (RMOs), a designation it applies to entities that have completed registration with the regulator. Investors who utilize unregistered platforms are not extended any form of protection under Malaysian securities law, the Securities Commission warned, adding that such platforms could put them at risk of fraud and implicate them in money laundering activity potentially. Enforcement actions Bybit has been directed by the regulator to disable its website and mobile applications that are currently targeting Malaysian investors within 14 business days from Dec. 11.  The regulator also wants the company to curb other forms of promotion aimed at Malaysian investors. With that, it has requested that the company take down its Telegram-based support channel for Malaysian customers. Advertising activity, including social media posts, must also cease in cases where such activity is aimed at Malaysian investors. The Securities Commission acknowledged that thus far, Bybit has been compliant with its latest enforcement requests. Intentions to secure licensing Bybit has responded to these developments on its Bybit Malaysia Telegram channel, stating that the company understands that these actions “may cause some inconvenience” to Malaysian customers. “Once we have secured the appropriate licenses, we look forward to reconnecting with you again in the future,” it added. The enforcement action is likely to be a setback for Bybit given that the firm appeared to be focusing on the Malaysian market of late. In June it emerged that the company was moving to relocate Chinese employees to both Malaysia and Dubai.  This is not the first occasion in which Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against a crypto platform. In 2023 the commission ordered the closure of the Malaysian operations of global exchange Huobi (subsequently rebranded as HTX). The circumstances in that instance were similar in that it acted against the exchange and its CEO for operating illegally within the Malaysian market. Within the Malaysian market, only six trading platforms have been registered. These include Hata Digital, Luno, MX Global, Sinegy, Tokenize Technology and Torum International. Earlier the Securities Commission acted similarly in prohibiting Atomic Wallet from operating within Malaysia given its failure to register its digital asset exchange activities.