OKX and HashKey plan partnership to promote industry development

HTX resumes Bitcoin and Ether services post $30 million hackDigital asset exchange HTX has successfully reinstated deposit and withdrawal services for major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), following a recent security breach that saw the platform drained of $30 million.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashMoving towards normal exchange operationsIn an official announcement published to its website on Sunday, HTX reported the restoration of services for specific virtual assets through the ERC20 blockchain, signaling a positive step toward normalcy. The exchange assured users that additional services would resume shortly.The statement listed more than 60 individual digital assets that have now been restored from the perspective of user withdrawals.Amidst the controversy sparked by the hack, HTX emphasized its commitment to covering all losses from its reserves. The exchange pledged ongoing investigations and the reinforcement of security measures to prevent a recurrence of such events in the future. The announcement stated:“Since its founding, HTX has remained committed to a policy of 100% reserves, ensuring our capacity to meet the withdrawal needs of all users.”Airdrop event plannedThe Seychelles-incorporated exchange also outlined details on an upcoming airdrop designed to incentivize community participation in the aftermath of the significant hack. The airdrop aims at users holding Rockets, with the value set at one USDT, and those possessing leading assets like HT, BTC and ETH will witness multiplied ticket values.The platform experienced a significant security breach alongside a similar incident on the HECO bridge, resulting in total losses exceeding $85 million. Justin Sun, an advisor to the exchange, pledged full compensation for all losses and temporarily suspended deposits and withdrawals until identified risks were addressed.Justin Sun controversySun provided additional insights through a series of posts on the X platform. He confirmed the full functionality of major cryptocurrencies, including BTC, ETH, TRX and USDT, and expressed expectations for the restoration of all others by the upcoming week. Sun wrote:“The majority of the work has been accomplished, and we aim to restore the remaining currencies gradually in the next few days, with all work expected to be completed by next week.”Justin Sun, known for his involvement in platforms that recently faced security breaches, reassured users of the ongoing efforts to enhance safety measures. This incident marked the fourth unfortunate event linked to Justin Sun-related platforms within a short span. HTX, formerly known as Huobi, suffered a $30 million hack, following HECO bridge, Poloniex and a prior HTX security breach.The controversial founder of the TRON blockchain network has come in for criticism of late. Travis Kling, Founder and Chief Investment Officer (CIO) of crypto fund Ikagai Asset Management, was scathing of Sun in comments made on the X platform on Monday. Kling wrote:“[Justin Sun] has been hacked four times in the last two months” . . . “He’s a criminal and terrible for crypto and the sooner we get him out, the better.”Earlier this month, the Poloniex crypto exchange fell victim to a $100 million hack, causing a stir within the wider crypto community. The exchange, like HTX, assured users of full compensation and even initiated a white hat bounty of $10 million for the safe return of assets, having identified the responsible party and indicating the initiation of criminal proceedings.

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

Late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob’s ‘Bull’ NFT on auction at OpenSeaNFT marketplace OpenSea is hosting an ongoing auction for a digital representation of the painting “Bull” by the late Korean artist Lee Jung-seob, Yonhap News TV reported on Tuesday. Celebrated for his distinctive lines in his paintings, Lee passed away in 1956. This auction is set to conclude on Dec. 12, with the starting bid placed at 300 WETH (Wrapped Ethereum), which is approximately equivalent to $626,000.Photo by Hans Eiskonen on UnsplashWhite bull as NFTLee’s “Bull,” featured in the OpenSea auction, is distinguished by its depiction of a white bull set against a dark green background. This particular piece is one of Lee’s unpublished works and is currently being offered for sale by a private art collector. Regarding the authenticity of the painting, the description on the OpenSea page states, “This work received a handwritten evaluation from Professor Jung Jum-sik, a founding member of the Lee Jung-seob Art Award, on November 9, 2000.”The current owner of the original artwork has expressed their intention for auctioning it as a desire to share a valuable piece of art. The painting originally belonged to poet Ku Sang and has since changed hands multiple times, experiencing some damage along the way. While the copyright for an artist’s work typically remains with their inheritors for 70 years posthumously, in the case of Lee Jung-seob, this period has already lapsed.Authenticity and NFT investmentsMeanwhile, art appraisal experts are advising caution, emphasizing the need to first confirm the authenticity of the original painting. This caution stems from the fact that the painting has not undergone evaluation by an official appraisal organization.During his interview with Yonhap, Jung Jun-mo, CEO of Korea Art Authentication Appraisal Inc., offered a word of caution regarding investment in NFTs tied to artworks with questionable authenticity. He emphasized that NFTs representing works that lack genuine authentication also hold no value in terms of authenticity. Jung advised potential investors to thoroughly verify the legitimacy of such artworks before proceeding with any investment in their NFT representations.Last year, many paintings of modern Korean artists were converted into NFTs, but they sparked controversy over issues of authenticity. Experts in art investment have since been advising thorough research prior to making any investments in these digital assets. They warn that losses incurred from transactions involving these NFTs fall squarely on the investors.