Philippines to move forward with CBDC without blockchain

Binance Headlines List of Japan FSA Warning Letter RecipientsJapan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) issued a warning letter on Friday stating that several foreign cryptocurrency exchanges have been operating in the country without proper registration, thereby infringing Japan’s fund settlement laws. The regulatory authority specifically named Binance, Bybit, MEXC Global, and Bitget as the entities in question.The FSA indicated that these exchanges need to register with the agency to continue operating in Japan. Failure to comply with the registration requirements would result in enforcement actions by the FSA, which could include the suspension of their operations in the country.©Pexels/David DibertUnregistered digital asset exchangesThe FSA’s warning letter detailed that the cryptocurrency exchanges mentioned had contravened Japan’s fund settlement regulations by engaging in crypto asset exchange operations without proper registration. The regulatory body emphasized that the current list of unregistered traders may not accurately reflect the current state of unregistered businesses in the country.The FSA intends to continue monitoring the market and taking appropriate regulatory measures to protect consumers and the integrity of the financial system. The agency also encouraged all unregistered operators to register with the FSA to avoid any possible enforcement actions.Clamping down on unregistered exchangesThe FSA’s recent action against unregistered cryptocurrency exchanges is in line with the regulatory body’s ongoing efforts to clamp down on non-compliant operators in Japan. In 2020, the FSA introduced new regulations mandating that all crypto exchanges must register with the agency and obtain a license to operate in the country. These regulations were put in place to strengthen consumer protection and enhance the transparency of the cryptocurrency market. By taking these measures, the FSA aims to foster a more stable and secure environment for the burgeoning crypto industry in Japan.The FSA’s warning to Binance is indicative of the growing regulatory scrutiny that the cryptocurrency industry in Japan and other nations is currently facing. Regulators are increasingly concerned about the potential risks associated with unregulated cryptocurrency exchanges, such as fraud, money laundering, and market manipulation. As a result, many regulatory bodies are implementing stricter rules and guidelines to promote transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the cryptocurrency market.These regulations aim to create a more secure and reliable environment for investors and industry participants. The FSA’s actions against Binance serve as a reminder to all market players that compliance with regulatory requirements is critical for the long-term success of the cryptocurrency industry.Global regulatory variationWhile Japan is taking steps to implement new regulations for the cryptocurrency and Web3 sectors, the country has not been as stringent in its approach as some other major economies, such as the United States. However, this does not mean that regulators in Japan are not actively monitoring the industry and taking appropriate action where necessary.One example of such action is the recent lawsuit filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the popular crypto exchange firm, Binance, and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, over regulatory violations. This highlights the fact that regulatory bodies in different parts of the world are taking a more proactive approach to monitoring the cryptocurrency industry.Moreover, the FSA in Japan issued a formal warning letter to Binance in 2021 for operating without the necessary permissions. This is an indication that the regulatory landscape in Japan is evolving, and that crypto exchanges must comply with the relevant regulations to avoid potential legal repercussions. While the severity of regulatory measures may differ across different jurisdictions, the message is clear: compliance is crucial for the long-term viability of the cryptocurrency industry.

OKX Burns $244M $OKB in Record Exchange Token Supply CutSeychelles-headquartered OKX, the world’s second largest cryptocurrency exchange, has conducted its largest-ever burn of its exchange token, $OKB, according to on-chain data.Approximately 5.5 million OKB tokens, equivalent to around $244 million, were removed from circulation. This record-breaking burn represents a significant milestone for OKX, surpassing the previous burns conducted since the monthly program’s inception.The burn was valued at approximately $258 million when calculated based on a 90-day average price, as reported by OKX. Chinese reporter Colin Wu highlighted that this burn marked another significant milestone in terms of the value of OKB tokens burned.Taking to Twitter on Thursday, Wu wrote: “The OKX exchange carried out the 20th OKB repurchase and burning on June 8, with a total of about 5.5 million OKB, or about 244 million US dollars, which once again set a new record for the value of OKB burning. OKX previously stated that it will burn OKX according to the seasonal market and operating performance, but has not disclosed the specific rules.”Photo by Jens Mahnke on PexelsBuy-Back & Burn program$OKB is described by OKX as a “global utility token issued by the OKX Blockchain Foundation,” offering holders various benefits such as discounts and exclusive access. The global exchange initiated the first Buy-Back & Burn program in May 2019. Since then, it has burned a total of 64,042,314.70 tokens as part of that ongoing burning process. Despite this significant development, the price of OKB has remained relatively stable, experiencing a slight increase of 0.29% on OKX. At the time of publication, the token was trading at a unit price of $44.97.Exchange token concernExchange tokens have recently garnered attention following the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against global crypto exchange Binance. The SEC has levied charges related to the sale of unregistered securities, resulting in a steep decline of nearly 15% in the value of Binance’s exchange token, BNB, over the past week.That scrutiny is likely to have followed the collapse of Bahamas-based cryptocurrency exchange FTX in November. At that time, it became apparent that the exchange was using its exchange token, $FTT, to prop up the business. FTX had issued $FTT tokens and used them as collateral, a dangerous act given that exchange tokens have no real-world asset backing and limited token utility.As the crypto market continues to face regulatory scrutiny and legal challenges, the burn of $OKB by OKX stands as a noteworthy event within the industry. The burn not only reduces the supply of $OKB tokens but also underscores OKX’s commitment to managing and enhancing the value of its exchange token. Market participants will undoubtedly monitor the implications of this burn and how it may influence OKB’s future performance in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.Exchanges like OKX are likely to carefully manage the supply levels of exchange tokens, given market perceptions in relation to the extent of the utility of such tokens, the scrutiny of regulators, and the problems caused in over-extending supply in the case of other exchanges in the past.

Korean Metaverse Platforms Face Uncertain Future Amidst Mounting ChallengesSeveral Korean metaverse platforms, which had promised to usher in a new world bridging online and offline experiences, have found themselves in premature jeopardy, according to industry observations. Various companies that had earmarked metaverse platforms as their future growth driver failed to establish an effective revenue structure to bring this to fruition, leading to speculation that there are limits to successfully developing this branch of business.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashDwindling popularityMetaverse platforms first garnered significant attention during the COVID-19 pandemic, but interest has waned since then — in Google Trends, the keyword “metaverse” has been showing a clear decline since reaching its peak in November of 2021.The actual usage rates of such platforms have also been low. According to the Korea Information Society Development Institute, last year’s usage rate was a mere 4.2%, and some local government-funded platforms had only about 200 daily visitors despite considerable budget sizes.As a result, companies struggling with financial difficulties have opted to downsize their operations, strategizing for mid- to long-term approaches to improving efficiency until an era of metaverse popularization arrives.Roadblocks for small and large companies alikeAccording to industry sources on Friday, platforms like Cytown, developed by social networking space Cyworld, have shut down after just a year, while Kakao Games’ collaborative metaverse venture Colorverse and Com2us Group’s Com2Verse have entered into restructuring phases.Com2verse’s decision comes just two months after the official release of its all-in-one metaverse platform. The company plans to provide three months’ salary to those applying for voluntary resignation and prioritize hiring new faces when expanding the workforce in the future. The scale of voluntary resignation has not been disclosed.The restructuring process will affect all employees except those involved in core functions such as development and services. Employees opting for voluntary resignation will also have the option to transfer to other subsidiaries under Com2us Group.Founded in April of last year, Com2Verse recorded an operating loss of KRW 8.3 billion (approximately $6.2 million) in the first half of this year. Its parent company, Com2us, also recorded consecutive deficits, starting with an operating loss of KRW 19.4 billion in last year’s fourth quarter, followed by losses of KRW 14.8 billion and KRW 5.6 billion in this year’s first and second quarters, respectively. Despite maintaining a stable revenue in its game business, the company faced challenges due to the poor performance of its subsidiary companies and the mounting labor costs needed for accelerating new business endeavors.Com2us has thus determined that it would be difficult to boost revenue and improve cost structure in the short term. Hence, the company chose to restructure its organization while retaining key personnel working under the Convention Center, an event platform on Com2Verse, which is expected to drive the business forward.Com2us emphasized that its commitment to the metaverse market remains unchanged, stating, “Given the current situation of local and international metaverse industries, we believe that significant time and investment will always be necessary. Therefore, we have decided that choosing our priorities and focusing on them is the best way to respond to long-term market changes.”Similarly, Kakao Entertainment had signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) last year with Neptune, a game developer in which Kakao Games owns a 35% share, and Colorverse, a metaverse company in which Neptune owns a 44% share, to jointly work on an open three-dimensional metaverse platform also called Colorverse. However, Colorverse has also undergone restructuring since earlier this year to reduce its workforce after it posted an operating loss of KRW 11.5 billion last year.Industry analysts have attributed Colorverse’s business slump to the departure of Namkoong Whon, the former CEO who had pinned his hopes on a metaverse as one of the conglomerate’s promising enterprises.Korean game developer NCSOFT had also said that it is building its own metaverse platform dubbed “Miniverse,” which allows various types of online gatherings from community meetups and study groups to remote classes and work. The company had even conducted a welcome presentation for new employees through Miniverse, but news regarding the project has been scant since then.As these major corporations have been struggling to overcome such hurdles, smaller startups have undoubtedly been facing increasingly dire circumstances as well, with some even resorting to unexpected suspensions of service operations without prior notice. Others have promoted themselves as metaverse platforms and issued virtual assets that can be used within the virtual world, but in many cases, these assets have proven to be of little benefit or use.“A revenue structure that can generate income from metaverse platforms has not yet been established. With the gradual decline in remote education, meetings, and telecommuting after the easing of the pandemic, the value of metaverse platforms has also decreased. Also, factors like increased information technology (IT) labor costs and the overall state of the global economy are influencing business momentum,” an industry insider commented.