South Korea's prestigious university to launch philosophy major dedicated to Bitcoin

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced his resignation on Sept. 7, citing completed trade talks with the United States and growing dissent within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). While the political transition follows the party’s defeat in July’s upper house elections, Ishiba’s departure also creates uncertainty for Japan’s crypto and Web3 agenda, which he had championed. Just two weeks earlier, at the WebX2025 event, Ishiba pledged stronger state backing for Web3 initiatives, noting their potential for addressing Japan’s demographic challenges and driving long-term economic transformation. He highlighted token-based community governance pilots, integration of Web3 at the Osaka Expo, and a five-year startup growth plan centered on digital industries. His exit now raises questions about whether these priorities will carry the same weight under new leadership.Photo by taro ohtani on UnsplashLeadership contest brings policy uncertaintyPotential successors signal diverging approaches. As per a BeInCrypto report, former Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi, who topped an August Nikkei approval survey with 23% support, is regarded as favoring tighter oversight. Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi, in second place with 8%, has shown greater receptiveness toward digital assets. According to Bloomberg, Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato is also considered a contender. Earlier, he emphasized balancing investor protection with space for innovation, noting the rapid uptake of crypto among Japanese investors. The LDP is preparing for a leadership election on Oct. 4, with 295 lawmakers each casting one vote and an equal 295 votes allocated proportionally to the party’s 1.03 million members, for a total of 590 ballots. Until then, investors and industry players are watching for signals on whether Japan’s digital asset roadmap will remain a priority. Adoption advances beyond politicsBeyond politics, adoption is accelerating across Japan’s financial system. Japan Post Bank plans to tokenize deposits on a permissioned blockchain by 2026 using the DCJPY token developed by DeCurret DCP, a Mitsubishi UFJ–backed venture. With $1.29 trillion in deposits across 120 million accounts, the move could streamline settlement of tokenized securities. Corporate strategies are also shifting. Last month Tokyo-based game developer Gumi said it would acquire 2.5 billion yen ($17 million) worth of XRP between September 2025 and February 2026, following its earlier 1 billion yen ($6.8 million) Bitcoin purchase this year. The company described XRP as central to its expansion into international remittance and liquidity networks led by its largest shareholder, SBI Holdings. Japan’s crypto footprint abroad is growing as well. Coincheck, a leading exchange in Japan, is entering Europe through the acquisition of Aplo, a French-licensed digital asset brokerage. The deal follows Coincheck’s Nasdaq listing last year via its Netherlands-based holding company. 

Artificial intelligence-driven education technology firm, Genius Group, has announced a plan to buy Bitcoin from the proceeds of damages that the company is pursuing through the courts. In a press release published to the Singapore-headquartered company’s website on June 26, it outlined that the firm’s Board of Directors has approved a distribution plan that would see any potential damages received from litigation that Genius Group is currently embroiled in, divided equally for distribution to shareholders and for the purchase of Bitcoin for the company’s Bitcoin treasury.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashUp to $1 billion in potential damagesGenius Group CEO, Roger Hamilton, commented on the matter, stating:“We are seeking combined damages of over $1 billion. As both lawsuits are being pursued by the Company to recover damages caused by third parties directly to our shareholders, the Board believes that 100% of any proceeds from the successful outcome of these cases should be directly distributed or reinvested for the benefit of shareholders.” On X, Hamilton outlined that there’s no guarantee with regard to how much the company recovers through litigation. However, he added that if justice prevails and the company is awarded $1 billion in damages, that would equal a $7 dividend per share for shareholders and the addition of 5,000 BTC to the firm’s Bitcoin treasury. Last month, the company provided an update on a lawsuit it has taken under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Initially, $450 million in damages had been pursued but Genius Group amended the lawsuit, raising its claim to $750 million.  The lawsuit is being taken against Peter Ritz and Michael Moe as the controlling officers and directors of LZGI International, and against Michael Carter and John Clayton, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida. The company alleges that the defendants attempted to defraud Genius Group.  ‘Bitcoin First’Genius Group announced its “Bitcoin First” approach, and the launch of a Bitcoin treasury in November 2024, getting started with an initial purchase of 110 BTC valued at $10 million at that time. In April 2025, a New York court prohibited the company from selling stocks in order to fund the purchase of Bitcoin. Those court-imposed funding restrictions led to the firm selling off a small proportion of the overall Bitcoin that it was holding.  Prior to that prohibition on the purchase of Bitcoin being imposed, Genius Group had expressed the aspiration to build up its Bitcoin reserve to a value equivalent to $100 million. Wading further into the Bitcoin space, the firm acquired blockchain learning platform, XD Academy, in December 2024. On May 22, Genius Group announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals had overturned the ban imposed on the company. With that, it increased its Bitcoin holdings by 40%. As of June 17, the company held 100 BTC, valued at around $10 million. The firm plans to bring forward another lawsuit “alleging naked short selling and evidence of spoofing against certain parties,” with damages being pursued in the region of $250 million. Commenting on the coming of age of Bitcoin and the pursuit of a Bitcoin treasury strategy back in November 2024, Hamilton stated that “we're living in a unique moment in history - one most public companies will miss.” 

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.