Zetrix launches product to simplify KYC for Chinese nationals

Regulatory breach sees Philippines initiate blockade on BinanceIt’s been a very challenging year for global crypto platform Binance — one that doesn’t appear to be improving with the latest move to block access to the platform in the Philippines.Photo by Alexes Gerard on UnsplashUnlicensed to tradeIn a noteworthy development, the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declared on Tuesday its intention to block access to the Binance platform due to regulatory irregularities.The SEC asserted in a statement that Binance lacks the necessary license to operate in the Philippines, cautioning the public against engaging in investment products on the platform. The regulator stated:”BINANCE is NOT REGISTERED as a corporation in the Philippines and OPERATES WITHOUT THE NECESSARY LICENSE AND/OR AUTHORITY.”The regulatory body is actively working to have Binance blocked in the country, citing concerns about unregistered investment products. The impending ban is set to take effect within three months, allowing investors a window to exit their positions held through Binance.Pushback on advertisingIn addition to its attempts to block access to the platform, the SEC has also approached tech giants Google and Meta (Facebook’s parent company), requesting the blocking of Binance advertisements on their platforms within the country. This is a response to social media campaigns designed to attract Filipino investors to the embattled cryptocurrency exchange. While users can still download the Binance app from Google and Apple app stores in the Philippines, the extent of investor activity in the country remains uncertain.Follows U.S. regulatory actionThese actions in the Philippines come hot on the heels of Binance’s CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) stepping down and pleading guilty in a U.S. money-laundering case. The Philippines’ ban adds to Binance’s challenges as it aims to expand in Southeast Asia amid legal troubles in the U.S. and restrictions on operations in China.Over the course of a three-month period earlier this year, the world’s largest crypto exchange platform lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands and Cyprus. Additionally, French authorities have been investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.Facing regulatory pushback in the U.S. and Europe, Binance appeared to be concentrating on making further in-roads in Asian markets over the course of this past year. It had recently pursued a joint venture with Gulf Energy in Thailand to launch a new digital assets exchange.Media reports previously suggested that Binance was considering acquiring a Philippine company to obtain operating licenses in the country. The SEC’s move to ban the platform follows a warning issued last year against using Binance, and it represents a broader effort to regulate the cryptocurrency sector and protect the public interest.The recent guilty plea by CZ for violating U.S. money laundering laws has added to the legal woes of the cryptocurrency giant. CZ agreed to personally pay $50 million in penalties as part of a $4.3 billion settlement to resolve investigations into Binance’s practices. He may also still face prison time in the U.S. In the Philippines, the SEC warns that Section 28 of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) allows the application of a fine of up to five million pesos ($90,000) and a maximum prison term of 21 years.

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.

Hong Kong regulators signal embrace of spot crypto ETFsHong Kong has signaled its readiness to usher in spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs), as the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) jointly announced on Friday that they are prepared to accept applications for such funds.Photo by Oskar Kadaksoo on UnsplashUpdated virtual asset-related policyIn a set of circulars released, a joint circular representing both regulators and a separate circular published by the SFC, they outlined the updated policy for intermediaries engaging in virtual asset-related activities.The SFC, responsible for overseeing financial markets in Hong Kong, expressed its openness to applications for the authorization of funds with exposure to virtual assets, specifically mentioning virtual asset spot exchange-traded funds (VA spot ETFs).This move expands beyond the existing crypto futures ETFs, demonstrating Hong Kong’s commitment to adapting its regulatory landscape to the evolving crypto market. It also builds on positive commentary made by SFC CEO Julia Leung on the subject last month. Leung stated that the regulator was open to the notion of retail participation in spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong.Leung stated:“We welcome proposals using innovative technology that boosts efficiency and customer experience. We’re happy to give it a try as long as new risks are addressed. Our approach is consistent regardless of the asset.”Use of license platformsFriday’s SFC circular emphasized that transactions conducted by these ETFs must occur through SFC-licensed crypto platforms or authorized financial institutions. The SFC outlined that both in-kind and in-cash subscription and redemption methods are permissible for SFC-authorized spot VA ETFs, providing flexibility in fund management.Custody requirements were also addressed, with the SFC specifying that the trustee or custodian must delegate its crypto custody function exclusively to an SFC-licensed Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) or entities meeting the crypto custody standards set by the HKMA.Industry responseThese latest circulars from the regulators have prompted a response from the industry. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange has reacted, welcoming the announcement. It believes that such a move would serve to strengthen Hong Kong’s position as a digital asset hub in the region. The exchange already lists a number of crypto futures ETFs, with multinational investment bank UBS having recently extended access to these products to its Hong Kong-based high-net-worth clients.While the regulatory landscape in the United States in 2023 has proven to be hostile, one very positive development appears to be ongoing work towards spot bitcoin ETF approval. Although still a matter of speculation, many industry commentators believe that approval will come through on Jan. 10. The advent of spot bitcoin and crypto ETFs in both eastern and western markets would likely make for an extremely bullish 2024 for the industry.Hong Kong’s move towards spot crypto ETFs aligns with its proactive stance in adapting to the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. The regulatory framework, as outlined in the circulars, reflects a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring investor protection. The city’s financial authorities have taken a comprehensive approach to review and update policies, once again signaling their ongoing commitment to embracing the growing role of virtual assets in the financial world.