Japan to fine-tune crypto regulations to protect investors

HKX management has advised Hong Kong resident users of the platform to withdraw assets following the company’s decision to halt operations in Hong Kong.  The company publicized its decision on July 18, making the following statement on its website: “We would like to inform you that our management team has, after careful consideration, decided to withdraw our application for the Type 1 and Type 7 licenses under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) and the virtual asset service provider license under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (Cap. 615).”Photo by Zhe ZHANG on UnsplashCompliance strugglesHKX’s exit from Hong Kong is the latest in a series of crypto exchange withdrawals from the Chinese autonomous territory. Other exchanges such as OKX, KuCoin, Gate.io and Binance had all bowed out back in May.  HKX initially applied for a Hong Kong license in February. However, like many others, the exchange failed to comply with Hong Kong’s regulatory requirements. While Hong Kong has been making a concerted effort to establish a regulatory framework and licensing system in order to create the conditions for it to become a crypto hub, it has also been grappling with making regulations strict enough to stamp out fraud in the wake of the JPEX exchange scandal. With that, it appears that many exchanges are finding the regulatory requirements difficult to live with. Originally, 24 exchanges had applied for a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. As it stands today, 12 of those original applicants have dropped out, with one more having its application returned with no clarity emerging as to the reason why. HKX has suspended new user registrations. The company’s management has not suggested that they will reapply for a license and reboot the service at a later stage. The company had flagged its intentions back in May, suspending trading and deposit services on May 29. OKX announced on May 24 that it was withdrawing from the Hong Kong market, citing a review of its business strategy. Around the same timeframe, Gate.io withdrew from the market in Hong Kong having failed to achieve compliance in accordance with the new licensing requirements.  Notwithstanding that outcome, the firm suggested that it planned to revamp its platform in line with the Chinese autonomous territory’s licensing requirements, and return to the market once that had been achieved. In a notice posted to its website on May 22, it stated: “Gate.HK is actively working on the aforementioned overhaul. We plan to resume our business in Hong Kong in the future and contribute to the virtual asset ecosystem after obtaining the relevant licenses.” That overhaul has yet to be completed as right now, the platform only allows the withdrawal of funds by its previous Hong Kong-based customers. Back in May 2023, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, suggested that there would be no light touch regulation in Hong Kong. HashKey Exchange, alongside OSL, was the first business to secure licensing under the new framework. In April, HasKey CEO Livio Weng told the Financial Times that these regulations block access to overseas investors while the local market in Hong Kong isn’t very big. It emerged in recent weeks that Hong Kong regulators are reviewing whether crypto regulation is “excessively stringent.” 

Maple Finance Secures $5 Million to Fund Asia ExpansionMaple Finance, a crypto capital network focused on institutional business, has recently concluded a funding round that raised $5 million, with a view towards using the funds to finance an expansion into the Asian market.Maple Finance operates as a platform that empowers lending pool delegates and credit professionals to establish their own credit facilities on the blockchain. These facilities cater to different borrowers who can draw from these pools.Notably, Icebreaker Finance initiated a $300 million lending pool on Maple to assist Bitcoin miners in 2022. Maple Finance functions as the infrastructure atop which these lending pools are built, with pool delegates and lenders independently evaluating and verifying their risk.Photo by Monstera on PexelsMaple Direct lendingThe capital infusion was led by Blocktower Capital and Tioga Capital, with participation from supporters including GSR Ventures, Cherry Crypto, Veris Ventures, and Spartan Capital. This funding will not only facilitate Maple Finance’s expansion endeavors but will also fuel the growth of its newly introduced pure-play lending division, Maple Direct.Maple Finance has spotted an opportunity that has opened up due to the collapse of lending giants like Genesis Lending, BlockFi, Voyager, and Celsius in the institutional lending space. In addition to its role as a platform for facilitating third-party pool creation, Maple Direct was launched in June. It offers overcollateralized loans secured by Bitcoin, Ethereum, and staked Ethereum as collateral.Sydney Powell, the firm’s Co-Founder and CEO explained that Maple Direct is designed to offer an over-collateralized lending product transparently on-chain, providing a differentiated approach in the market. Unlike other platforms, borrowed collateral isn’t rehypothecated for yield generation; instead, it is securely held with a qualified custodian. This strategy positions Maple Finance to cater to market demand while minimizing risk.Strategic expansionPowell told TechCrunch: “I think now is the time to do that because all the other competition exited, and so that’s created this opportunity for us to step in and offer a product.” He expanded further on how the company is thinking strategically, relative to the expansion of the services it is now offering: “Other players try to focus on just trying to build the technology, kind of like Uber and Airbnb. What we’ve tried to do is to act as an underwriter so we need to show credit expertise. I think it gives us a little bit more control over the outcome and it’s a little bit closer to Apple in that it’s more vertically integrated.”Pushing into AsiaThe newly raised funds are earmarked for global expansion, with a particular focus on the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. This is a strategic move, considering that several jurisdictions in APAC, such as Singapore and Hong Kong, have adopted pro-crypto regulations.“In Asia, you have regulatory clarity, or rather, regulatory support, both coming out of Hong Kong and Singapore in terms of new legislation that’s come through, and you already have a very heavy trading focus over there,” Powell stated.Maple’s product development is ongoing. Earlier this month, the company launched a Treasury Bill Pool that provides accredited investors with access to US Treasury Bills with what it claims is a “risk-free rate” of return, given that the pool generates a yield of 4.67%.

Korean Supreme Court acquits Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyungThe Supreme Court of South Korea, in a significant ruling on Thursday (local time), acquitted Song Chi-hyung, chairman and principal stakeholder of Dunamu, of fraud and forgery charges, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. This ruling is particularly noteworthy because Dunamu is the operator of the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.This decision, led by Justice Oh Kyung-mi, marks the culmination of a legal battle that began with Song’s indictment in Dec. 2018, and it extends to the acquittal of the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the head of the Data Value Team, who were jointly indicted.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBackground of the caseSong Chi-hyung and his colleagues were alleged to have fabricated an account on Upbit between September and November 2017. They had been accused of feigning the deposit of assets valued at KRW 122.1 billion and then employing these fictitious funds to enable transactions among actual members.The prosecution also leveled fraud charges against them, claiming that the fabricated account was utilized to sell 11,550 bitcoins to 26,000 members, thereby generating KRW 149.1 billion.The Seoul Southern District Court, acting as the court of first instance, found them not guilty. The court reasoned that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to establish that the defendants actually deposited the assets in the account.Issues with the prosecution’s evidence gatheringThe Seoul High Court, serving as the appellate court, identified problems with the evidence provided by the prosecution, determining that part of it lacked credibility due to improper collection methods. Notably, the court observed that the prosecution had directed Dunamu employees to access their Amazon cloud server to download the account’s transaction history. However, since this remote server was not included in the search and seizure warrant, the court highlighted the illegitimacy of the evidence.The appellate court also pointed out another issue with the evidence: documents stored on the CFO’s USB drive. The prosecution did not follow the legitimate search process, which requires them to extract only data related to the allegations. Moreover, the prosecutors did not present a warrant when confiscating the laptop of the Data Value Team’s lead, further undermining the credibility of their evidence.The court further stated that even if the remaining evidence provided by the prosecution was considered viable, it was still insufficient to substantiate the prosecution’s accusations.The prosecution, disagreeing with the decision of the appeals court, had escalated the case to the Supreme Court. However, the highest court in the nation sided with the ruling of the appeals court, effectively upholding the decision made at the appellate level.