Thai SEC prepares launch of tokenized securities trading

Jingdong Coinlink Technology Hong Kong Limited, a branch of JD Technology Group, has declared its intention to launch a stablecoin tied 1:1 to the Hong Kong dollar (HKD). Despite its status as a sandbox participant under the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), Jingdong Coinlink has clarified that this does not imply endorsement or licensure for stablecoin issuance. The company aims to offer this blockchain-based stablecoin as a solution for businesses seeking efficient, cost-effective and secure payment methods.Photo by Ben Cheung on PexelsThe proposed stablecoin promises redemption on a 1:1 basis, supported by reserves of “highly liquid, highly-trusted assets” held in licensed financial institutions. Furthermore, Jingdong Coinlink commits to ongoing cooperation with global regulatory bodies to ensure compliance with existing and future legal frameworks. Cryptocurrency developments in Hong KongThis announcement comes amidst a series of significant cryptocurrency-related activities in Hong Kong. On July 23, CSOP Asset Management launched Asia’s first Bitcoin futures inverse product, following their successful Bitcoin Futures ETF in December 2022. Additionally, the cryptocurrency exchange HKX recently retracted its application for a license from the HK Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), advising users to withdraw their crypto assets. This withdrawal adds to the growing list of 12 other platforms that have either pulled back their license applications or had them returned by regulatory authorities. 

Kbank’s Upbit Customer Deposits Total $2.2BKbank, an internet-only bank in South Korea, is facing criticism due to its relatively high proportion of cryptocurrency customer deposits compared to other banks. Kbank reportedly manages approximately KRW 3 trillion (equivalent to $2.2 billion) in deposits from customers of cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, which accounts for about 18% of its total customer deposits.This percentage stands out, being notably higher than other banks that provide accounts to the other four crypto-to-fiat exchanges in Korea. That is according to a report by Maeil Business Newspaper, which obtained documents submitted to lawmaker Kim Hee-gon by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).According to Korean law, crypto exchanges must secure real-name bank accounts from banks to offer crypto trading services against the Korean won. Kbank offers its accounts to Upbit, the dominant player in the Korean crypto market.Photo by David McBee on PexelsNotable exposure to crypto exchangeThe FSC documents showed that Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits totaled KRW 3.09 trillion, making up 18% of its total deposits, which amount to KRW 17.2 trillion.In a striking contrast, Nonghyup Bank had 0.2% of its deposits, equivalent to KRW 557.8 billion, in Bithumb, which is the nation’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange. Kakaobank, another internet-only bank, had 0.3% (KRW 112.2 billion) of its deposits in Coinone. Shinhan Bank held 0.01% (KRW 43 billion) in Korbit, and Jeonbuk Bank had a similarly small 0.02% (KRW 4.2 billion) in Gopax.Lawmaker Kim pointed out that Kbank has become a bank dedicated to crypto trading. Kim proposed that financial authorities take proactive measures to assess the potential risks that may emerge when Kbank utilizes Upbit customer deposits as a basis for offering credit loans. Such risky financial practices could potentially result in higher loan defaults and the emergence of a greater number of individuals with poor credit histories, which could ultimately jeopardize the stability of the financial market.Regulatory gapThe current Financial Transaction Reporting Act mandates that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) segregate customer deposits from their own assets as a measure to combat money laundering. However, it has been noted that there are regulatory gaps stemming from the absence of specific guidelines for the custody of these deposits.According to the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Nonghyup and Kakaobank store deposits in separate accounts within the bank. On the other hand, Kbank and Jeonbuk Bank keep deposits in corporate accounts under their respective exchange partners’ names.When deposits are stored in separate accounts within the bank, only the bank has access to those funds, and they are essentially operated in a manner similar to a trust, preventing the bank from using the funds arbitrarily. In contrast, funds held in corporate accounts can be used by the bank as a source for lending. Lawmaker Kim warned that in scenarios such as exchange bankruptcies or similar situations, banks holding customer funds in corporate accounts could face difficulties in ensuring customer protection.Each of these banks receives reserve funds from crypto exchanges in anticipation of potential compensation requirements in the event of unforeseen losses. The FSS states that as of the end of last month, the reserve amounts held by each bank were as follows: Kbank had KRW 200 billion, Nonghyup Bank had KRW 100 billion, Kakao Bank had KRW 73 billion, and both Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank had KRW 30 billion.Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits are approximately 72 times larger than Shinhan Bank’s Korbit customer deposits. However, the reserve amounts held by Kbank are only 6.7 times greater than those held by Shinhan. Lawmaker Kim emphasized the importance of banks maintaining reserve funds that are proportional to the customer deposits held in their partner crypto exchanges.Signs of recoveryMeanwhile, the Korean cryptocurrency industry, which faced a downturn in the latter half of last year due to events like the Terra collapse and FTX’s bankruptcy, has exhibited signs of recovery in the first half of this year.The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the FSC recently reported that the cryptocurrency market cap in South Korea has reached KRW 28.4 trillion as of the end of June this year. This reflects a 46% increase compared to the end of last year when it stood at KRW 19.4 trillion. Additionally, the total operating profit of domestic exchanges surged by 82% to KRW 227.3 billion over the past six months, compared to the previous figure of KRW 124.9 billion.The total market’s max drawdown (MDD) was 62%. MDD assesses the extent to which an asset has declined in value from its highest point to its lowest point within a specific time frame, before experiencing a recovery. The FIU considers this MDD to be high, urging investor caution.

Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has said that Malaysian government agencies and the country’s central bank need to study blockchain and cryptocurrency from a policy perspective so as not to get left behind.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashConsidering major changesHis comments emerged alongside the news that Anwar had discussed digital finance policy matters with Abu Dhabi government officials and with Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder and former CEO of Binance. According to the New Straits Times, an English-language newspaper published in Malaysia, the Malaysian government is homing in on the establishment and adoption of a formal policy relative to digital assets and blockchain.  Anwar confirmed that discussions also related to “digital transformation, data centers and artificial intelligence (AI),” and that the demands that Malaysia now faces require the government to consider major changes. In discussion with local media, Anwar stated: "I proposed several months ago how our agencies, including security, treasury and Bank Negara study how Malaysia can explore this so we aren't left behind. Ensuring that is regulated could safeguard the people's interests and prevent leakages.” Crypto-friendly regulationsAnwar added that a “radical departure from the old ways” would be needed for Malaysia to remain competitive, emphasizing the need for the Southeast Asian country to keep up to speed through the application of crypto-friendly regulations. Addressing the pace of technological change, he stated: “This is an evolution which happens quickly and requires us to be equally fast. We feel that Malaysia should not be left behind while mired in an old financial system.” In moving towards setting out a clear policy relative to digital assets, the Malaysian prime minister is encouraged by his recent dialogue with United Arab Emirates (UAE) government officials. He said that they confirmed that they feel they can forge close cooperation with Malaysia on the matter. Anwar added:“We need to discuss this in detail, leave behind the old business model and give meaning to this digital finance policy.” Taking to the X social media platform, Binance’s CZ described the nature of his discussion with the Malaysian prime minister, stating: “The discussions were not about Binance but about the crypto industry and Malaysia, including regulations, policies, risks, and collaborations between industries and across national borders. Forward!” A pseudonymous crypto investor and programmer, @darren_com_my, responded to CZ’s tweet to explain that the Malaysian government provides support to the digital assets industry via government agencies, but that, on the other hand, it has blacklisted a number of exchanges such as HTX (formerly Huobi) and Binance.  The local regulator has issued licenses to six virtual asset service providers. In recent weeks, Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against global exchange Bybit and crypto app Atomic Wallet, prohibiting them from trading within the jurisdiction due to both companies not having obtained the required licensing.