Local crypto firms in talks with Hong Kong’s SFC on crypto staking

Recognition of Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election on Nov. 6 has led to many crypto proponents in Asia foreseeing a positive outcome for crypto within the Asian region, and globally.Photo by Kevin Lanceplaine on UnsplashBright future for cryptoAccording to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), crypto proponents in China are expectant of a bright future for crypto both on the Chinese mainland and in Hong Kong. The mindset seems to be that a pro-crypto stance in the U.S. will lead to other jurisdictions taking a similar approach. HashKey CEO Livio Weng expressed such a view, stating:“Trump’s pro-crypto stance is expected not only to invigorate the US virtual-asset industry, but also to encourage Hong Kong to further relax its own virtual-asset policies in its quest to become a global Web3 hub.”  Prior to being elected, Trump had promised to fire Gary Gensler, who as Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has pursued a strategy of regulation by enforcement, a course of action that has been broadly criticized by crypto market participants in the United States. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse wasted no time in calling on Trump to act, and to fire Gensler. Influencing regulatory attitudesThere seems to be a consensus among commentators that the regulatory approach to crypto in the U.S. is going to become crypto-friendly. Crypto analyst Miles Deutscher suggests that “a Trump victory is a WIN for US tech innovation, as it would solidify [the United States’] status as a crypto powerhouse.” Weng believes that “this shift could also positively influence regulatory attitudes toward virtual assets in mainland China.” That view is mirrored in South Korea by KP Jang, head of Xangle Research. Jang asserts that “if Trump implements bold virtual asset policies while improving existing regulations, it is expected to accelerate regulatory reforms in Korea as well.” Sumit Gupta, CEO and co-founder of India’s largest crypto exchange, CoinDCX, outlined on X that Trump’s victory is a pivotal moment for global crypto, adding:”The direct effects of Trump’s policies might not alter India’s regulatory environment right away. However, global sentiment and investor behaviour will be influenced, eventually reaching India.” The CoinDCX CEO believes that should Trump now appoint regulatory leadership that’s crypto-positive, any resultant crypto regulatory framework adopted by the U.S. could become a blueprint for use by other nations. Gupta identified further potential upside insofar as the implementation of positive crypto policies by Trump would lead to a more attractive environment for crypto, “potentially opening up enhanced funding opportunities and partnerships for Indian startups as investors seek global growth.” Bitcoin price surgeAt the time of writing, the Bitcoin unit price is up 0.64% over the course of the past 24 hours, at $74,884. American business news channel CNBC reported that Bitcoin could reach $100,000 before Trump even takes office.  Matthew Hougan, chief investment officer (CIO) at crypto asset fund manager Bitwise, said that Trump’s election victory could herald in a “golden age of crypto,” with a friendlier regulatory environment leading to greater institutional investment and mainstream adoption.

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNXMark Lamb, the co-founder of failed crypto derivatives and yield platform CoinFLEX, has asserted that creditors of the company cannot interfere with OPNX, a Seychelles-incorporated company that Lamb has co-founded with Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the founders of failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashFallout following writIt emerged in October that a group of CoinFLEX creditors had filed a writ of summons in the High Court of Hong Kong, claiming that OPNX, a new crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform linked to CoinFLEX, was established using CoinFLEX assets without their consent. While incorporated in the Seychelles, CoinFLEX ran its operations from Hong Kong.The writ alleges that Mark Lamb misappropriated assets, diverted clients and business opportunities and engaged in actions harmful to creditors during his tenure.The creditors argue that Lamb, while serving as CoinFLEX’s CEO, simultaneously devoted time and effort to setting up OPNX, contrary to his responsibilities. The allegations include diverting assets, falsely representing OPNX’s association with CoinFLEX creditors, disclosing confidential trade secrets and soliciting employees to move to OPNX.The legal action — filed by two companies, Liquidity Technologies and Liquidity Technologies Software — claims that OPNX’s formation was unauthorized and harmful to CoinFLEX creditors. Despite CoinFLEX’s terms of service requiring dispute resolution through arbitration in Hong Kong, the allegations have not been proven in the High Court of Hong Kong.Lamb addresses ‘Twitter FUD’In response to these creditor actions, earlier this week, Lamb took to X (formerly Twitter) to address what he termed as “Twitter FUD.” Lamb wrote:“The Hong Kong court ruled that the few CoinFLEX creditors behind recent ‘FUD’ must not disrupt or interfere with OPNX in any way — and their legal counsel has subsequently stopped representing them.”Lamb added that he hoped that CoinFLEX’s 4,800 creditors would choose the path that he has proposed on the basis that it “maximizes value.”OPNX has defended its position, emphasizing that it provided an opportunity for creditors to sell their claims on the exchange for quick cash, benefiting them. Davies and Zhu have pledged to donate their share of the profit to 3AC creditors.In February, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, announced the rebranding of CoinFLEX to Open Exchange (OPNX). However, the writ of summons claims that OPNX is a separate entity not authorized by CoinFLEX creditors. Leslie Lamb followed up in April by claiming backing from well-known entities in crypto venture capital, only for many of those mentioned to immediately refute such claims.The dispute has also implicated Roger Ver, a well-known character in the crypto space otherwise referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver, a significant individual customer, was accused of defaulting by CoinFLEX. Ver denied defaulting and claimed that CoinFLEX used his trading positions against him, leading to a court-ordered arbitration.OPNX, since its launch in April, has obtained a Lithuanian license for spot trading in the EU and currently processes substantial daily trading volumes. Criminal and civil proceedings against OPNX co-founders Davies and Zhu are ongoing. The situation remains fluid as the legal dispute unfolds.

3AC Founder Secures Restraining Order in SingaporeSu Zhu, the Co-Founder of the defunct crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) has successfully obtained a restraining order against BitMEX Co-Founder and former CEO, Arthur Hayes, in a Singaporean court.Photo by Monstera on PexelsNo communication “by any means”Crypto publication CoinDesk stated on Wednesday that it had seen a copy of the court order, which was originally issued on May 5. According to the details of the order, Hayes is prohibited from “making any threatening, abusive or insulting communication that would cause the Applicant harassment, alarm or distress.”Additionally, the former CEO of crypto trading platform BitMEX is forbidden from using “threatening, abusive or insulting words” in relation to Su Zhu. The order, which was issued by Judge Sandra Looi Ai Lin, clarifies that the BitMEX Co-Founder is not permitted to publish “any identity information” relative to Zhu or to communicate with him “by any means.”$6 million owedIt’s an understatement to say that Zhu, alongside fellow 3AC founder Kyle Davies, are not on Hayes’ list of favorite people in recent times. Following the 3AC collapse, Hayes has maintained that he is owed $6 million by the duo. Since the collapse of the hedge fund, Hayes has been tweeting out at the pair, calling them out relative to his claim that the duo have a debt obligation to him to the tune of $6 million.While both Hayes and Zhu have blemishes on their records, Hayes is much better regarded within the crypto community than Zhu. The BitMEX Co-Founder narrowly avoided a prison sentence in 2022 with the much lesser sanction of six months home detention being applied. That arose due to federal charges brought against him on the basis that he didn’t implement anti money laundering (AML) compliance procedures and checks at BitMEX while he was CEO of the firm.Despite this failure, Hayes remains popular within the crypto space, with his insightful commentary being lauded given that since he left BitMEX he has taken to writing blog articles relative to crypto and the broader economic situation. However, blog site Medium has taken to disabling access to his most recent blog article. The blog page states that the post “is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules.”Lacking a welcomeIn contrast with Hayes, commentary relative to the 3AC duo of Zhu and Davies has lacked warmth. Neither of the duo had jumped on social media for a number of months following the collapse of 3AC. More recently they have both tried to rehabilitate themselves, with many commentators within the space seeing it as a cynical move.In February the duo launched Open Exchange, more commonly known as OPNX, a trading platform for crypto-related bankruptcy claims. At that time, Hayes tweeted out that he interpreted the news as the return of the crypto bull market.Earlier this month, OPNX claimed that it had the backing of several credible entities in the crypto space. However, immediately afterwards, a number of those firms clarified that they had nothing to do with the startup.Meanwhile, crypto-focused venture capital investor Michael Arrington tweeted out his disdain in relation to the 3AC founder’s successful fund raise:“Three f***ing arrows dip****s successfully raising a new fund is the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.”The regulator in Dubai has also failed to roll out the red carpet for the duo’s new venture. In April, it issued an investor alert in relation to OPNX. Subsequently, it has followed up with a formal written reprimand issued to Zhu and Davies, given that the business is not registered with the regulator although operating out of Dubai.