OKX mulls U.S. IPO

Bybit Gets Outline Approval to Operate in KazakhstanBybit, the cryptocurrency spot and derivatives trading platform, is expanding its operations with a recent “in-principle” approval from the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) in Kazakhstan. This approval allows Bybit to operate as a digital asset trading facility and custody services provider at the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC).Photo by Engin Akyurt on PexelsExpanding area of operationsBen Zhou, the co-founder and CEO of Bybit, expressed his belief in the promising potential of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) region for the growth of the crypto industry. He also emphasized Bybit’s commitment to complying with local regulations, following the recent scrutiny the company faced in Japan for operating without proper registration.To obtain permanent authorization to serve the local market, Bybit must fulfill certain pre-conditions specified in the in-principle approval and complete the application process. In April, it emerged that the company had established its global headquarters in Dubai, where it has already secured “in-principle” approval to operate a virtual assets business. Bybit has also been active in Hong Kong and is in the process of obtaining a license to trade in the Chinese autonomous territory.Debit card and lending servicesAs well as a geographical expansion, in recent months Bybit has also been expanding its service offering. On May 2, the exchange announced the introduction of crypto lending services for its users. This addition allows users to lend and borrow cryptocurrencies through the Bybit platform, providing them with more opportunities to maximize their holdings.Earlier this year, Bybit collaborated with Mastercard to launch a new debit card tailored for cryptocurrency payments. This partnership aimed to bridge the gap between traditional financial systems and the growing crypto ecosystem, allowing users to spend their cryptocurrencies seamlessly in everyday transactions.Kazakhstan’s crypto strategyKazakhstan got off to a difficult start with crypto. Once crypto miners were banished from China, many of them moved operations to Kazakhstan, putting pressure on the local power grid.The local administration has since gotten to grips with the industry, restricting crypto miners’ access to cheap electricity. Bybit’s decision to offer services in Kazakhstan aligns with the country’s current efforts to position itself as a regional hub for crypto, mining, and blockchain.In February, local officials implemented a mandate that requires 75% of revenue generated from crypto mining to be sold through a crypto exchange, with the aim of combating tax evasion.CBDC developmentFurthermore, Kazakhstan has been actively exploring the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and is currently in the pilot phase of its implementation. The introduction of a CBDC can potentially revolutionize the country’s financial landscape, offering faster and more efficient digital transactions while maintaining regulatory oversight.Bybit’s pre-approval in Kazakhstan signifies the company’s strategic expansion into a region with a favorable regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies. As the crypto industry continues to evolve, partnerships between traditional financial institutions and crypto exchanges, like the collaboration between Bybit and Mastercard, demonstrate the increasing integration and acceptance of digital assets in mainstream financial systems.

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.

While Indonesia has been recognized as one of the world's swiftest embracers of cryptocurrencies, it has faced a notable setback more recently, with a 60% decline in transaction volumes on local exchanges compared to the preceding year. High taxesIn a recent report by CoinDesk Indonesia, the publication speculates that the imposition of high taxes may be a pivotal factor dissuading traders and impacting the overall market dynamics. Indonesia’s tax system treats crypto assets as commodities, with the burdensome taxes arising as a direct consequence of that classification. The tax framework in Indonesia subjects crypto assets to both income tax and value-added tax (VAT), treating them akin to commodities. Leading crypto exchanges in the country reveal that the cumulative tax load on each transaction could surpass the trading fees imposed by exchanges, potentially discouraging users from engaging in crypto transactions. Oscar Darmawan, the CEO of the leading Indonesian crypto exchange INDODAX, told CoinDesk that users bear an income tax of 0.1% and a VAT of 0.11% on every crypto transaction. Additionally, exchanges are required to remit a 0.04% fee to the recently established national crypto bourse. Darmawan clarified that “this places a significant financial burden on the domestic crypto industry." expresses Darmawan in an interview with CoinDesk Indonesia, underscoring the challenges faced by the industry due to the current tax structure.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsAn international issueThe tax treatment of digital assets has been a bugbear for the crypto space on an international basis. In Japan, it arose last month that the country’s lawmakers were considering applying an exemption for companies from paying taxes on unrealized cryptocurrency gains. It has since transpired that such an amendment will be applied to its fiscal 2024 tax reform plan. India has applied a heavy tax burden where crypto is concerned, with a 30% tax applied to capital gains relative to the sale of crypto assets. Additionally, 1% taxation applies by way of a tax deducted at source (TDS) on crypto transactions. The use of cryptocurrency for the purchase of goods and services in the United States remains a stumbling block, given that the current tax code treats such a scenario as a taxable event. Last year, two U.S. senators attempted to address that issue, by including a $200 exemption for purchases made with cryptocurrency. Calls for crypto asset reclassificationIn response to this dilemma in Indonesia, some stakeholders within the local crypto industry advocate for a paradigm shift in the classification of crypto assets. They propose treating crypto as securities instead of commodities, anticipating that this alteration could alleviate the tax burden on users. Yudhono Rawis, the CEO of the exchange platform Tokocrypto, asserts: "Both stocks and crypto are tradable assets with profit potential … Thus, implementing the same tax regime for both these investment instruments would be more equitable and consistent." The industry anticipates regulatory changes in the near future, as crypto oversight in Indonesia is set to transition from the commodities regulator to the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in January 2025.