Circle Partners with Asian Convenience Store Chain to Push USDC Adoption

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

Beosin Report: Crypto Rug Pulls Surpass DeFi Exploits in MayAccording to a recent report by blockchain security firm Beosin, losses from “rug pulls” or “exit scams” in the cryptocurrency space exceeded the amount stolen from decentralized finance (DeFi) projects during the month of May.The report, published on June 1 by Beosin Blockchain Security, revealed that rug pulls and scams resulted in losses of over $45 million across six incidents during the month. Beosin is headquartered in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan province. The firm uses formal verification methods to secure smart contracts.In general there were 22 security incidents in the digital assets space over the course of the month. That overall figure accounts for losses totaling $20 million, and represents a vast improvement on the previous month.Three of the incidents were accounted for by security issues related to hardware wallets such as the Trezor and imKey wallets. Six were rug pulls/crypto scams, two were crypto crime incidents while another implicated a critical vulnerability relative to zero-knowledge proof technology.Photo by Tara Winstead on PexelsDeFi protocol attacksIn contrast, there were 10 attacks on DeFi protocols, amounting to $19.7 million in stolen funds. This figure represents a significant decrease of nearly 80% compared to April, and the losses from these types of exploits had been declining for two consecutive months, as per Beosin’s findings.The largest rug pull incident in May involved the alleged disappearance of $32 million associated with the crypto project Fintoch on May 24. Meanwhile, the largest attack on a DeFi platform was a $7.5 million breach targeting Jimbos protocol, according to Beosin’s report.Shifting hacker strategyBeosin noted a shift in the targeting strategy of hackers and scammers, who are now increasingly focusing their attacks on ordinary users rather than various project parties. To mitigate risks, the report recommended that crypto users enhance their anti-fraud awareness, conduct thorough due diligence before investing in projects, and learn how to improve the security of their digital assets.The report also issued a warning against using shared or public charging devices for mobile phones. Beosin highlighted the potential risks associated with these devices, as they could be manipulated to inject malicious programs that compromise private keys. This caution aligns with a similar advisory issued by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in April.The FBI’s Denver office cautioned against using public USB ports, including those found at airports, due to the potential introduction of malware and monitoring software onto devices. Instead, they suggested carrying a personal charger and USB cord for use with electrical outlets.As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for users to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their investments. With the rise of rug pulls and the ongoing threats in the DeFi space, staying informed, exercising caution, and adopting robust security measures are essential for protecting one’s digital assets in this rapidly changing industry.

SC Ventures Exits Digital Asset Custody Infrastructure InvestmentSC Ventures, the Singapore-headquartered corporate venture capital arm of Standard Chartered Bank, has announced its decision to divest its stake in Metaco, a Swiss-based digital asset custody firm. As one of Metaco’s early adopters, SC Ventures played a crucial role in supporting the company’s growth and development.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsDissolving a partnershipHaving been the largest institutional investor in the digital custody infrastructure firm, SC Ventures contributed significantly to the enhancement of Metaco’s award-winning custody product. The partnership between the two entities facilitated valuable contributions in various areas, including corporate governance, business strategy, institutional use cases, and access to SC Ventures’ extensive ecosystem. Through their collaboration, SC Ventures aimed to provide institutions with a secure and compliant ecosystem for operating digital assets.Ripple acquisitionIn a recent development, enterprise blockchain company Ripple acquired Metaco for $250 million. Ripple’s acquisition of Metaco signifies its diversification into custody solutions, expanding its business opportunities within the blockchain sector. With this move, Ripple aims to offer its customers technology that enables custody, issuance, and settlement of various types of tokenized assets. Further evidence of Ripple’s interest in this area emerged last week with the news that the company is collaborating with authorities in Hong Kong to showcase real world asset tokenization.Despite the acquisition, Metaco will continue to operate as an independent brand and business unit, under the leadership of its founder and CEO, Adrien Treccani. This decision ensures continuity and stability for Metaco’s existing clients and partners while benefiting from the resources and support provided by Ripple.Ongoing linkWhile the divestment of a division of an international banking behemoth like Standard Chartered from a digital asset infrastructure firm may seem like a bad news story, it’s likely not that straightforward. It’s worth noting that Zodia Custody, itself a digital assets custody venture incubated by SC Ventures, continues to maintain a strategic partnership with Metaco.The ongoing collaboration between Zodia Custody and Metaco focuses on matters related to compliance and risk management. This partnership ensures that both companies can leverage their respective expertise to address the increasing demand for safe and compliant access to cryptocurrencies and digital assets from institutional investors.Despite this divestment, it appears that SC Ventures still recognizes the importance of supporting emerging technologies on the cusp of adoption through its continued involvement with Zodia Custody, continuing advancements in the digital asset space.SC Ventures’ exit from its stake in Metaco marks a significant milestone in the ongoing evolution of both companies. While SC Ventures has played a vital role in Metaco’s growth, the acquisition by Ripple opens up new opportunities for Metaco to expand its offerings and cater to a broader customer base. Meanwhile, the collaboration between Zodia Custody, Metaco, and SC Ventures ensures that institutional investors have access to secure and compliant solutions as the demand for digital asset services continues to rise.