NEAR Foundation and Dongdaemun District of Seoul Forge MOU to Boost Web3 Industry

With the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong having introduced its new Stablecoins Ordinance on August 1 and local taxi operators required to facilitate two forms of digital payment from April 1, 2026, a case is being made that this eventuality lends itself to an ideal test case for stablecoin payments.Photo by The Transport Enthusiast DC on UnsplashA perfect test caseIn an opinion piece published by Bloomberg on Aug. 3, columnist Andy Mukherjee asserted that Hong Kong taxis would be “a perfect stablecoin test case,” suggesting that the timing is ideal for stablecoins, given that a new licensing regime has come into effect via the city’s Stablecoins Ordinance.  In an interview, Franz Bergmueller, CEO of Switzerland-headquartered crypto bank AMINA Bank, said that “stablecoins for me are a killer use case.” On social media, AMINA Bank claimed that it would be “a major step in the right direction” if Hong Kong taxis start to accept stablecoin payments from customers. It emerged last December that the city’s taxi drivers would be required to install both electronic payment facilities and navigation systems, based on a filing made to Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The filing outlined that while some taxi drivers currently offer electronic payment options, many insist on cash payment. The city’s Transport and Logistics Bureau suggested that “drivers offer at least two electronic payment options, including both QR code and non-QR code methods.” Stablecoin payments overseasThere has been some limited use of stablecoins as a payment method by taxi services in places with unstable currencies such as Argentina and Venezuela. The world’s most popular ride-hailing service, Uber, is understood to be studying the feasibility of offering stablecoin-based payments. In 2024, Asian rival Grab commenced accepting crypto, including the USDT and USDC stablecoins, as a means of payment for ride-sharing and food delivery services in Singapore. Last month, it extended that facility to its platform users in the Philippines.In June it emerged that Tawasul Transport, a taxi service in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), had partnered with Al Maryah Community Bank (Mbank) and Abu Dhabi’s Department of Municipalities and Transport to launch a pilot program implicating the use of AE Coin, a UAE dirham-pegged stablecoin, as a means of payment. Bloomberg’s Mukherjee suggests that for entities now applying for stablecoin licensing, this new digital payment requirement for Hong Kong’s taxi services could provide an immediate segue to onboard users and make a new stablecoin product popular. Mukherjee places specific emphasis in this regard on what actions Ant Group may take. It emerged recently that Ant Group, an affiliate of the Alibaba Group, intends to apply for stablecoin licensing across Asian markets, including Hong Kong. The company is already a leader in Asia in digital payments through Alipay, which serves 1.3 billion users.Although Ant Group is based in mainland China, Hong Kong would offer the company the opportunity to test the establishment of a stablecoin for retail payments.

Crypto Titans Clash on Elon Musk’s XA subtle panel discussion photo posted by Andrei Grachev of Singapore’s DWF Labs turned into a war of words among crypto trading titans on Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter).Photo by Marek Piwnicki on UnsplashDWF vs GSRGrachev, who is a Managing Partner at the market maker and Web3 investment firm, thanked his fellow panelists in the post. However, the tone quickly soured as Cristian Gil, Co-Founder of rival market-making giant GSR, took offense to Grachev’s presence on the panel and voiced his disapproval on the platform.Gil didn’t mince his words, stating: “[Andrei Grachev] had absolutely no business to be on that panel. It’s insulting to [GSR] , [OKX] and [Wintermute] to be in the same room as [DWF Labs].”DWF vs WintermuteHis remarks received a “Like” from Evgeny Gaevoy, the CEO of market maker Wintermute. In response, Grachev defended his presence, asserting that DWF was superior in technology, trading, and business development compared to its rivals, going so far as to suggest to Gil: “Yeah, if I were you — I would be also crying all the time.”The exchange continued with Grachev claiming that DWF was capturing market share from Wintermute, and Gaevoy responded with a nonchalant “lol,” challenging Grachev to invest more if he believed DWF posed a threat.DWF Labs’ rapid growthWhile the exchange consisted of mere words, it shed light on DWF Labs’ sudden rise to prominence earlier over recent months. The company has featured prominently in an array of investments in Web3 startups and blockchain networks over the course of 2023. Prominent among them have been investments in EOS, the Algorand ecosystem, and the TRON ecosystem.Recently appearing on the BlockBeats podcast, Grachev defended the company, outlining that it was not involved in market manipulation in response to recent assertions to the contrary.“We do not engage in any manipulative behavior,” Grachev stated. “Of course, we have the futures market, which is a tool for hedging positions and trading clubs. We are completely different from directional traders,” he added.Gaevoy added some humor to the mix by sharing a meme, raising questions about the maturity level of these prominent figures in the crypto industry. The spat provoked a broad array of commentary from the crypto community.Crypto immaturityThe very public clash raises concerns about how traditional Wall Street firms, currently making bold moves into the crypto space, might perceive such behavior. Notably, firms like BlackRock have been involved in Bitcoin ETF applications, signaling a growing interest in cryptocurrency among mainstream financial institutions. In response to Gaevoy and Grachev, one commentator wrote: “The institutions are never coming back.”While it would appear that there’s no love lost between DWF, GSR, and Wintermute, it also seems evident that both market makers can agree on Singapore as being an appropriate location from where to operate a crypto business. While Wintermute is London-based, it revealed recently that it was expanding its operations in Singapore. Like Wintermute, GSR is primarily based in London although it too maintains a presence in Singapore to service Asia-centric business.

Singapore’s Regulator Imposes 9-Year Ban on 3AC FoundersSingapore’s central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), has handed down a nine-year prohibition order to Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, co-founders of the failed crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Swapnil Bapat on UnsplashSevere restrictionsThe penalty relates to alleged violations of the city-state’s securities laws. The prohibition order came into effect on Wednesday, carrying severe restrictions for Davies and Zhu.During this nine-year period, Davies and Zhu are prohibited from engaging in any regulated activities in Singapore. They are also barred from managing, serving as directors, or holding substantial shares in any capital market services business within the territory of Singapore.Loo Siew Yee, the Assistant Managing Director of Policy, Payments, and Financial Crime at MAS, emphasized the seriousness of the violations in a statement released by the central bank on Thursday. Yee stated:“MAS takes a serious view of Mr. Zhu’s and Mr. Davies’ flagrant disregard of MAS’ regulatory requirements and dereliction of their directors’ duties.” She further asserted that MAS would take action against senior managers who engage in such misconduct.Securities law violationsMAS’s decision to impose these sanctions on the 3AC co-founders was based on its findings of further securities law violations during investigations into 3AC and its founders. The regulatory authority accused Davies and Zhu of failing to inform MAS when 3AC hired a new business representative, providing false information to the regulator, and neglecting to establish an appropriate risk management framework.3AC’s troubles stemmed from the crypto market crash that occurred last year, triggered by the Terra ecosystem’s collapse. The hedge fund’s leveraged crypto positions exposed it to billions in loan defaults, resulting in significant financial losses. Its lack of risk management had a cascading effect in crypto. Lenders like Celsius and BlockFi had exposure to 3AC, leading to further collapses later in 2022 as a consequence.3AC’s creditors claim that the firm owes as much as $3.5 billion, and liquidators are now seeking to recover approximately $1.3 billion from Zhu and Davies, who allegedly incurred the debt when the firm was already insolvent.Regulatory reprimandsThis action by MAS follows last June’s reprimand of 3AC, which occurred just before the hedge fund filed for bankruptcy amid widely reported insolvency issues. At that time, MAS had criticized 3AC for providing false information, failing to report directorship changes involving Zhu and Davies, and exceeding the legal assets under management threshold.It’s just the latest reprimand the duo have received from a regulator this year, though. Zhu and Davies have been busy in trying to get another start-up off the ground. Earlier this year, they launched OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform. The venture is based out of Dubai, and the firm reported in April that it had gotten significant VC backing.Many of those that the company claimed were backing the venture disassociated themselves from those claims. The following month, the Dubai regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), reprimanded the OPNX founders, having issued an investor alert relative to the firm a few weeks prior to that. VARA's complaint was that the business had been operating without having acquired the appropriate licensing.