Latest Chinese Crypto Crackdown Sees Influencer Accounts Shut Down

News emanating from the Central Asian republics of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan in recent days points to further rollout and development of cryptocurrency sector infrastructure. A press release published on March 26 outlined that Kyrgyzstan is working on various initiatives in order to copper-fasten its position as a regional crypto hub. Those efforts include the advancement of digital asset regulation, enabling the launch of licensed crypto platforms and ongoing trials of legal frameworks relative to crypto. Photo by Steve Johnson on UnsplashA7A5 stablecoinOne initiative that may aid in the development of the digital assets sector in Kyrgyzstan is the rollout of the A7A5 stablecoin. A7A5 is pegged to the Russian ruble, with the token having been issued by Kyrgyz company Old Vector. The product was first launched in February, with the intention for it to be used on the A7 cross-border payment platform of Russian state-owned bank Promsvyazbank. Garantex, a Russian crypto exchange which had been sanctioned by U.S. and European authorities and was recently shut down, announced on Feb. 19 the listing of the A7A5 stablecoin. The stablecoin’s backers claim that it was issued “in complete accordance with the new national legislation - under the control of regulatory authorities and directed to an officially registered, regulated broker.” The stablecoin is being promoted on the basis of an annual yield of up to 20%, which has been established due to its link to the refinancing rate of the central bank of the Russian Federation. Kazakhstan crypto bank proposalMeanwhile, lawmakers in Central Asian neighbor Kazakhstan have proposed the creation of a national crypto bank. According to The Times of Central Asia, an English-language daily newspaper, Azat Peruashev, leader of the Ak Zhol political party within Kazakhstan’s lower house of parliament, put forward the proposal, which would implicate the involvement of the National Bank of Kazakhstan and a number of the country’s commercial banks. Peruashev addressed the proposal to Kazakhstani Prime Minister Olzhas Bektenov. However, the Central Asian country may have some fundamental issues to address before a crypto bank can become a reality. Currently, Kazakhstan has yet to establish a legal framework for the use of digital assets.  Last year, the authorities shut down 36 cryptocurrency exchanges which were deemed to have been operating illegally. In total, 3,500 illegal crypto exchanges have been shut down in Kazakhstan. Leading American crypto exchange business Coinbase faced a setback in the Central Asian country in November 2023 when the government cut access to its website within the country. While these crypto businesses have struggled to operate in Kazakhstan, Binance Kazakhstan successfully obtained a trading license from the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA) in September of last year. Earlier this month, the company added options trading and futures copy trading to the platform. Blockchain industry pioneer Kyle Chasse took to X to report on this most recent development. He suggested that given that 90% of crypto activity in Kazakhstan is off the books, the authorities are interested in launching a crypto bank so as to bring it all under their control. 

Korea’s prominent crypto exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently resumed charging trading fees, local media outlet Edaily reported. However, these changes in fee policies are reinforcing Upbit’s dominant market position while downsizing Bithumb’s and Korbit’s market shares. Meanwhile, the local banks affiliated with crypto exchanges are benefitting from an uptick in fee revenue from the recent bitcoin boom. According to crypto data intelligence platform CoinGecko on Feb. 28, Upbit accounted for 77.4% of the local market share in crypto transactions, followed by Bithumb (20.43%), Coinone (1.73%), Korbit (0.35%) and Gopax (0.09%). Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashShifts in market sharesAs of March 2, the market shares of Bithumb and Korbit decreased by 8.59 percentage points and 0.21 percentage points, respectively. Conversely, Upbit’s dominance grew to 86.57%, up by over 9 percentage points. A Korbit official said it’s too early to pass judgment on Korbit’s market performance, as the exchange’s policies on trading fees could change depending on the market sentiment. The person added that CoinGecko tracks only eight types of tokens traded on Korbit and does not cover all the transactions on the exchange.  Bithumb had previously benefited from charging no fees, driving up its market share to as high as over 40% in December. Following the decision to impose a fee of 0.04% on Feb. 6, however, the exchange has been experiencing a drop in transaction volume. Korbit also reinstated trading fees last Thursday, roughly four months after eliminating them on Oct. 10 as a promotional move. However, it's worth mentioning that the newly introduced trading fee is 0.07%, which is lower than the earlier rate of 0.2%. Meanwhile, Gopax currently exempts fees for users who trade BTC, ETH, XRP and USDC.  No local regulations on fees for crypto transactions At the moment, there are no local regulations on fees for crypto transactions, leaving the task of setting such fees to individual trading platforms. It is known that crypto exchanges in other countries, such as the U.S., set their own rates as well.  

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”