BlackRock Investment Marks its Return to India

India tightens control with 3,000 police officials trained in crypto investigationsAs the crypto sector continues to develop, authorities continue to get to grips with the new crypto innovation, with India’s law enforcement being the latest entity to look to clamp down.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashCrypto forensics and investigation trainingAccording to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) annual report, a comprehensive training initiative was undertaken during the financial year 2022–2023. The initiative, spearheaded by the Narcotics Control Bureau and the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), equipped over 2,900 officials with essential skills in cryptocurrency forensics and investigation.Under the aegis of the Narcotics Control Bureau, India’s central law enforcement and intelligence agency, 141 officers underwent specialized training in the investigation of darknet activities, cryptocurrencies and other pertinent areas such as digital footprints.The report stated that workshops were set up that covered techniques for gathering intelligence and evidence from open sources and social media platforms, reflecting a commitment to staying ahead in the ever-evolving landscape of cybercrime.There’s clearly a need for this level of expertise, given an uptick in crypto-related scams in India and the broader Asia region as a whole in recent times. Earlier this week, it emerged that the Indian authorities had arrested eight individuals in relation to a $300 million cryptocurrency scam.Raj Kapoor, the founder of the India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), recently called for greater control when it comes to crypto-related illicit financing. Kapoor stated:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”I4C played a pivotal role in training over 2,800 cyber police officials. The training encompassed crypto forensics, investigations and emerging technologies like anonymization networks. The focus extended to addressing the misuse of mobile applications in the cyberspace realm.Ongoing blockchain tech adoptionAs India proactively prepares to combat potential crypto-related crimes amidst increased adoption, the nation is also delving into mainstream blockchain applications. In a recent stride towards digital transformation, Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL), the state-run oil and gas company, partnered with blockchain software firm Zupple Labs. Together, they launched a blockchain system designed to automate the verification of purchase orders (POs).HPCL’s spokesperson outlined the significance of this implementation to Cointelegraph, stating that the integration helps automate the verification of HPCL POs to external parties, utilizing the blockchain system alongside HPCL’s internal e-PO. This generates tamper-evident, verifiable POs, enhancing efficiency and transparency within industry processes.In a separate development, it emerged on Thursday that India’s Central Bureau of Investigation has appointed Singapore-headquartered digital asset market intelligence outfit Liminal to manage seized digital assets.This holistic approach, combining advancements in law enforcement training and embracing blockchain applications, underscores India’s commitment to navigating the evolving landscape of digital technologies while looking to ensure a secure and transparent future.

South Korea Reveals Guidelines for Public Officials’ Virtual Asset DisclosureSouth Korea’s high-ranking government officials will soon be obliged to divulge specific information regarding their virtual asset holdings, including types and quantities, as part of their wealth declaration process. The Ministry of Personnel Management (MPM) issued a press release yesterday, announcing revisions to the Enforcement Decree of the Public Service Ethics Act. These amendments are slated to come into effect on December 14.Photo by Chris Boland on UnsplashIn addition, officials holding positions of rank one or higher will be required to disclose the methods through which they acquired their virtual assets. They must also furnish documentation of transaction records for a period of one year.These amendments to the decree come in the wake of the revised Public Service Ethics Act, which was passed in May. The primary aim of this act is to make it obligatory for government employees to declare their virtual asset holdings. The changes to the decree can be summarized into five main points.Types and amountsFirst, officials obligated to disclose their wealth must report the types and amounts of virtual assets. The prices of virtual assets traded on Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit — all virtual asset service providers (VASPs) designated by the Commissioner of the National Tax Service — are required to be reported using the average daily price observed on the reporting day. As for other assets, their values should align with their most recent market prices. In cases where determining these prices is not feasible, they should be reported at reasonable values that reflect transaction prices.Acquisition methodsSecond, high-level public officials must explain how they acquired virtual assets. Under the existing regulation, officials are obligated to reveal both the date and method of acquisition, along with the source of funds. However, following the adoption of the updated decree, they will also be required to provide analogous information for virtual assets.Year-long transaction historyThird, comprehensive guidelines will be established to outline the process of reporting virtual asset transaction history records. Officials subject to the disclosure requirement must divulge all virtual asset transactions conducted within the past year, even if they do not possess such assets on the day of reporting. They are obligated to furnish documentation prepared by VASPs.Officials and their family membersFourth, officials are required to permit VASPs and other relevant institutions to provide the Government Ethics Committee with information on virtual asset holdings owned by both themselves and their family members. This will be facilitated through the inclusion of virtual assets in the existing information provision agreement, similar to the approach applied to other types of assets such as real estate.Addressing conflict of interestLastly, the revised decree could potentially impose restrictions on certain public officials with regard to possessing virtual assets, especially when their responsibilities encompass tasks like formulating relevant policies, granting approval for virtual assets, and overseeing taxation matters related to them. The outcomes of these restrictions will be reported on an annual basis to the Government Ethics Committee.In a briefing regarding this development, MPM Vice Minister Lee In-ho underscored the significance of the amended decree as the regulatory framework for enforcing the requirement of public officials to declare their virtual assets. He highlighted the Korean government’s commitment to ensuring that public servants adhere to accurate reporting practices concerning virtual assets, thereby preventing unlawful accumulation of wealth.

In the ongoing legal tussle over cryptocurrency assets, the High Court of Singapore has rejected a plea by the bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Arthur Cheong, the founder of Web3 investment firm DeFiance Capital. This ruling represents a pivotal moment in the $140 million dispute, shedding light on the ownership and control of assets, while building upon DeFiance Capital’s previous success back in August of last year in having its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore endorsed.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashRecognizing assets held in trustOn Jan. 26, a Singapore judge ruled against 3AC's request to have Cheong’s claim thrown out, stating that DeFiance Capital has adequately demonstrated the existence of a Singapore-based trust safeguarding its assets. This revelation could potentially shield DeFiance Capital from 3AC's liquidators, marking a crucial juncture in the legal battle. The dispute traces back to an agreement where Cheong was set to launch an independent fund on the 3AC Group platform, with ownership and control vested in DeFiance Capital. This fund, leveraging 3AC's infrastructure, faced disagreements over the transfer of certain assets, whose undisclosed value became a point of contention in court documents. The downfall of the $10 billion 3AC hedge fund, responsible for the "Super Cycle" thesis predicting perpetual crypto price increases, had widespread repercussions in the crypto industry. DeFiance Capital bore the brunt of this collapse and the recent court ruling brings the firm closer to resolving the aftermath favorably. The ongoing argument holds strategic importance for DeFiance Capital, as the investment firm challenges any legal obligation for its shareholders to compensate 3AC creditors. "Wassielawyer," a pseudonymous restructuring attorney advising DeFiance Capital's founder Arthur Cheong, highlighted the significance of this stance on social media. Positive signThe judge's acknowledgment of the trust, while not conclusive, is viewed as a positive sign for DeFiance Capital. In a series of posts on the X social media platform, Wassielawyer outlined on Thursday that he sees this as "much-needed vindication" for Cheong, signaling a potential turn in favor of the investment firm. Wassielawyer emphasized that DeFiance Capital merely utilized 3AC's legal structure, without commingling operations. This distinction becomes crucial as carefully drafted legal documents form the basis for 3AC creditors attempting to seize DeFiance Capital funds. The restructuring professional added:”[DeFiance Capital] have on the basis of the substantive facts, ran an argument that the assets of DCs should not be used to pay back 3AC creditors. This eventuality would be manifestly unjust, enriching the creditors of 3AC at the expense of innocent DC investors.” Once a major player in the crypto hedge fund arena, 3AC's demise resulted from exposure to Terra, staked Ethereum and Grayscale's Bitcoin Trust. The bankruptcy filing on June 30, 2022, marked the end of an era for the once-mighty fund. Established in 2020, DeFiance Capital specializes in crypto investments, focusing on decentralized finance and GameFi. It has supported projects such as dYdX, Aave and Lido. This decision establishes a precedent for similar cases, particularly in jurisdictions like Singapore, emerging as pivotal hubs for cryptocurrency and blockchain-related activities. The outcome holds implications for how such legal disputes will be handled in the future, shaping the landscape of crypto-related legal proceedings.