Tokyo Government Launches Initiative to Support Security Token Businesses

Celebrating a Decade of Crypto in South Korea: Experts Convene to Chart the FutureThe MK Virtual Asset Conference, an event held in Seoul yesterday to celebrate the 10th anniversary of South Korea’s cryptocurrency industry, convened experts, politicians, and stakeholders to discuss the future of blockchain and digital assets.The conference was hosted by Maeil Business Newspaper and its blockchain subsidiary Mblock, and sponsored by cryptocurrency exchange Korbit, the Korean Securities Association, and the Korea Derivatives Association. It served as a valuable opportunity to evaluate the current state of the crypto market and explore solutions for pressing challenges.Photo by Ciaran O’Brien on UnsplashInevitable rise of blockchainOne of the distinguished speakers at the event highlighted the inevitable rise of blockchain technology. Kim Yong-beom, CEO of Hashed Open Research, the research arm of Seoul-based crypto venture capital firm Hashed, said, “Blockchain is the antithesis of the modern financial and capital system. While traditional finance possesses its own merits, it also carries substantial transaction fees and is confined within national boundaries. It is only natural that such a counterforce has emerged to address these issues.”He continued, “Given that traditional finance properly responds to blockchain technology’s rise and overcomes its limits, blockchain may lose its competitive edge. However, if traditional finance fails to do so, blockchain will not be easily dismissed.”CEO Kim also highlighted the third section named “Blueprint for the Future Monetary System” of the Bank of International Settlements’ 2023 Annual Economic Report, which was published in June. The report states, “The BIS Innovation Hub, in partnership with central banks around the world, stands at the forefront of experimentation with CBDCs and tokenization.” According to Kim, the traditionally conservative financial institution, which had previously been skeptical about blockchain-based distributed ledger technology, has now shifted its position to be more accepting of blockchain.Importance of institutional investorsDuring the conference, an academic underscored the importance of allowing institutional investors to enter the virtual asset space. Kang Hyoung-goo, an assistant professor in the Department of Finance at Hanyang University Business School, pointed out that the crypto market, when primarily driven by retail investors, tends to favor volatile assets over stable ones. Due to this inclination, more individual investors are attracted to exchanges where speculative trading is a frequent occurrence. This dynamic creates a vicious cycle, he explained.Defining digital assetsOn a different note, Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim and Chang, one of the largest law firms in the country, emphasized the crucial need to establish a legal definition of digital assets. In Lee’s view, digital assets exist in the form of data on the blockchain, setting them apart from traditional assets. He argued that without a legal definition outlining the nature of these assets, they could potentially devolve into entities that mislead the public, lacking both legal reliability and trustworthiness.Political voicesPoliticians also took the stage to share their thoughts. Back Hye-ryun, a Democratic Party of Korea member, expressed in her congratulatory speech her commitment to protecting virtual asset users through legislation. Kim Jong-min, another lawmaker from the same party, underscored the unstoppable nature of the blockchain trend. Yun Chang-hyun, a lawmaker of the ruling People Power Party, mentioned that while Bitcoin couldn’t establish itself as a key currency in an anarchic manner, stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are now positioned to fill that role.Regulatory considerationsMeanwhile, Kim So-young, Vice Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, stressed the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the societal impact of cryptocurrencies and how governments should oversee them. He emphasized that the Korean government aims to establish a balanced framework to facilitate the responsible development of digital assets. Furthermore, he highlighted the necessity of collaborating with major economies due to the global nature of virtual assets.

China’s GAPP proposes ban on gaming crypto token conversionChina’s gaming industry hit a significant speed bump on Friday as the General Administration of Press and Publication (GAPP) unveiled a draft proposing substantial changes to the regulation of in-game tokens, signaling a strategic shift in the country’s stance on digital currencies in gaming.Photo by blurrystock on UnsplashImplementing more stringent controlsThe proposed regulations by GAPP bring about a ban on the conversion of game tokens into physical goods or legal tender. These guidelines, spanning 64 articles, impose stringent requirements on gaming companies. These include mandatory licensing in China, a two-year data retention policy, adherence to national and socialist values in content and the eradication of anonymous user registrations.One significant aspect of the guidelines is Article 23, which specifically addresses the use of game tokens. It proposes restrictions on exchanging them for physical goods, services or legal tender.The regulatory landscape becomes more complex due to the ambiguity surrounding cryptocurrencies, which are not recognized as legal tender in China. Although a warning was issued about the risks inherent in non-fungible tokens (NFTs), they remain legal in China. NFTs feature prominently within blockchain-based gaming.Game providers are also confronted with new limitations on inducements, such as bonuses for registration or daily logins, and are mandated to implement measures against irrational consumer spending.Gaming sector falloutIn the wake of these developments, several Chinese tech giants experienced a significant market downturn in Hong Kong. Tencent, a global gaming powerhouse and one of China’s most valuable companies, saw a 12.4% drop on Friday, marking its worst day since October 2008. This decline erased a massive 367 billion Hong Kong dollars ($47 billion) from Tencent’s market value.NetEase, another gaming giant, witnessed a 25% dive in Hong Kong afternoon trade, recording its most substantial daily loss since its listing in June 2020. Additionally, Bilibili and Kuaishou, prominent players in video-sharing and short-video platforms, experienced declines of 9.7% and 7.2%, respectively, given their involvement in online gaming.Market uncertaintyWith this latest development, the future of gaming crypto tokens remains uncertain in China, with investor confidence having been hit hard. Putting the matter in context on Friday, Stansberry Research Analyst Brian Tycangco took to the X social media platform, stating:”Govt regulation will effectively render prevailing business models irrelevant due to uncertainty regarding monetization. Games are inherently reward-based and if you clamp down on the use of rewards/incentives, you turn an entire industry on its head.”The guidelines, open for public consultation until Jan. 22, 2024, have not yet been legally enacted. This time frame allows for feedback and potential adjustments before enforcement.Notably, the Web3 gaming sector has witnessed substantial activity, with approximately a million unique active wallets engaged daily over the past three months, according to DappRadar. Industry experts, including Yat Siu of Animoca Brands, anticipate a potential surge in user engagement, emphasizing the potential impact of these regulations on the gaming industry’s trajectory.

At the 16th Mint Annual BFSI Summit and Awards in Mumbai, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Shaktikanta Das reiterated the central bank's cautious stance on cryptocurrencies, regardless of recent global developments. During the event, which was held on Thursday, Das took to the stage. He was asked if the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States gives legitimacy to cryptocurrency.Photo by rupixen.com on UnsplashUnwavering responseDas was unwavering in his response, maintaining that the RBI remains steadfast in its approach and opposition to cryptocurrencies. He stated: "The way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what."  He emphasized that the RBI does not intend to emulate regulatory decisions made by other countries. Despite this global development, Das maintained the RBI's reservations, expressing concerns about the potential risks associated with venturing further into the cryptocurrency space. Favoring a crypto banLast month, officials from the Indian central bank told the Hindustan Times that the RBI believes that the Indian government should impose an outright ban on cryptocurrencies in India. One unnamed official stated:"The government cannot sidestep the RBI’s concerns while deciding on cryptocurrencies, as it is responsible for monetary stability in India and maintains price stability." Das acknowledged the potential of blockchain technology, the foundation of cryptocurrencies, highlighting its versatility for various applications. Both the central bank and the Indian government have encouraged the development of blockchain rather than crypto. Last year, an RBI-led initiative, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), recruited blockchain expertise to further develop that project. However, he made it clear that the RBI's focus remains on strengthening governance and assurance in regulated entities, with an emphasis on early identification, close monitoring and effective management of risks. Citing ‘Tulipmania’Das cautioned against a “crypto mania,” drawing parallels to the historical tulipmania of the 17th century. He underscored the RBI's position that embracing cryptocurrencies could pose significant risks, echoing his previous warnings about the macroeconomic and financial stability risks associated with these digital assets. The governor emphasized the importance of instilling an appropriate risk culture within organizations, with active involvement from the board and senior management. Das stated that the RBI expects top officials and board members to play a more proactive role in risk management. India’s crypto community responded critically to the RBI governor’s comments. Ajeet Khurana, a Web3 growth investor, responded on social media, stating:”Dear RBI governor, I respect you a lot, and I don’t mind that you don’t like Crypto. Diverse points of view are healthy. Yet, using words like 'tulip mania' only gives the impression that you are out of touch with what is happening in Web3. My request, Sir, is that you update yourself.” Vivek Sen, the founder of Bitgrow Lab, wrote:”Dear RBI, First, don't club Bitcoin with ‘Crypto’. Secondly, Tulips did not experience an 80% drop on four occasions, and they recovered each time.”Despite opposition to cryptocurrencies in official circles in India, a report last year produced by Chainalysis found that India is leading the way in Asia in terms of grassroots adoption of cryptocurrencies.