Korean Crypto Exchange Alliance Reveals Standardized Regulation Guidelines

Korean regulator monitors non-listed token amidst peer-to-peer trading surgeThe South Korean financial regulator is closely monitoring BTCMobick, a non-listed token issued by crypto influencer Oh Tae-min, who is known for authoring books like “The Great Bitcoin” and “Bitcoin and the Geopolitics of the Dollar.” The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is cautioning local crypto exchanges regarding the potential for price manipulation should the token be listed.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashBTCMobick TokenThe BTCMobick token is reportedly being traded peer-to-peer at around KRW 300,000, which is approximately equivalent to $230, in chat rooms of messaging apps like KakaoTalk outside of cryptocurrency exchanges. The token has gained enough traction to spur the emergence of dedicated apps that facilitate these peer-to-peer trades, charging fees for their services. Based on the size of the chat rooms and apps involved, it is estimated that approximately 3,000 participants are trading the token, according to a report by local news website Etoday.As per another coverage by the same outlet, the Virtual Asset Inspection Division of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), which operates under the FSC, has inquired with local crypto exchanges on two occasions — once in September and again this week — about whether they have listed or are planning to list the BTCMobick token. It’s rare for the financial authority to specifically target a particular token when making inquiries with crypto trading platforms.Potential price manipulationAn FIU official explained the rationale behind the agency’s inquiry into crypto exchanges. The official stated that the probe aimed to caution the exchanges about potential price manipulation of the BTCMobick token. The concern is that many crypto users might suffer losses if such a token, which has been experiencing a continual rise in price outside of trading platforms, were to be listed. Currently, legal penalties for cryptocurrency price manipulation fall under the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which will not be enforced until July 2024. This indicates a regulatory gap in the immediate term.Hwang Suk-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs and Information Security, pointed out that while giving out privately generated tokens to friends or acquaintances doesn’t raise any legal issues, the situation changes once these tokens are listed for trading on exchanges and distributed more broadly in the market. In such scenarios, these tokens can become a source of legal disputes, he explained.Amidst these developments, there are circulating rumors suggesting that BTCMobick is on the verge of being listed on exchanges. An industry insider has mentioned that there are brokers actively spreading these rumors, indicating that the token might soon become publicly tradable.Oh Tae-min’s denial of rumorsMeanwhile, Oh Tae-min, the creator of BTCMobick who has been distributing his token for free, states that the token is part of an experiment intended to mimic the early stages of Bitcoin. However, critics are concerned that the personally issued token has no practical utility. Addressing the circulating rumors about the token’s potential listing on exchanges, Oh asserts that these rumors are baseless and false. He further warns that any brokers spreading such rumors are likely engaging in fraudulent activities.

Crypto Titans Clash on Elon Musk’s XA subtle panel discussion photo posted by Andrei Grachev of Singapore’s DWF Labs turned into a war of words among crypto trading titans on Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter).Photo by Marek Piwnicki on UnsplashDWF vs GSRGrachev, who is a Managing Partner at the market maker and Web3 investment firm, thanked his fellow panelists in the post. However, the tone quickly soured as Cristian Gil, Co-Founder of rival market-making giant GSR, took offense to Grachev’s presence on the panel and voiced his disapproval on the platform.Gil didn’t mince his words, stating: “[Andrei Grachev] had absolutely no business to be on that panel. It’s insulting to [GSR] , [OKX] and [Wintermute] to be in the same room as [DWF Labs].”DWF vs WintermuteHis remarks received a “Like” from Evgeny Gaevoy, the CEO of market maker Wintermute. In response, Grachev defended his presence, asserting that DWF was superior in technology, trading, and business development compared to its rivals, going so far as to suggest to Gil: “Yeah, if I were you — I would be also crying all the time.”The exchange continued with Grachev claiming that DWF was capturing market share from Wintermute, and Gaevoy responded with a nonchalant “lol,” challenging Grachev to invest more if he believed DWF posed a threat.DWF Labs’ rapid growthWhile the exchange consisted of mere words, it shed light on DWF Labs’ sudden rise to prominence earlier over recent months. The company has featured prominently in an array of investments in Web3 startups and blockchain networks over the course of 2023. Prominent among them have been investments in EOS, the Algorand ecosystem, and the TRON ecosystem.Recently appearing on the BlockBeats podcast, Grachev defended the company, outlining that it was not involved in market manipulation in response to recent assertions to the contrary.“We do not engage in any manipulative behavior,” Grachev stated. “Of course, we have the futures market, which is a tool for hedging positions and trading clubs. We are completely different from directional traders,” he added.Gaevoy added some humor to the mix by sharing a meme, raising questions about the maturity level of these prominent figures in the crypto industry. The spat provoked a broad array of commentary from the crypto community.Crypto immaturityThe very public clash raises concerns about how traditional Wall Street firms, currently making bold moves into the crypto space, might perceive such behavior. Notably, firms like BlackRock have been involved in Bitcoin ETF applications, signaling a growing interest in cryptocurrency among mainstream financial institutions. In response to Gaevoy and Grachev, one commentator wrote: “The institutions are never coming back.”While it would appear that there’s no love lost between DWF, GSR, and Wintermute, it also seems evident that both market makers can agree on Singapore as being an appropriate location from where to operate a crypto business. While Wintermute is London-based, it revealed recently that it was expanding its operations in Singapore. Like Wintermute, GSR is primarily based in London although it too maintains a presence in Singapore to service Asia-centric business.

Gate.io Threatens Legal Action Against SpeculatorsGate.io, the erstwhile legacy Chinese cryptocurrency exchange currently headquartered in the Cayman Islands, has issued a stern warning to individuals spreading rumors of imminent bankruptcy.The exchange intends to take legal action against those responsible for causing panic among investors by disseminating baseless rumors without any concrete source of information. This announcement, originally written in Turkish, was posted on Gate.io’s official Twitter account on June 4.Photo by Kai Pilger on UnsplashInsolvency rumorsThe insolvency rumors surrounding Gate.io emerged following a series of events involving Multichain, a troubled cross-chain protocol. Multichain has been facing technical difficulties since May 24, when a node issue resulted in transaction delays. Several days later, the Multichain team revealed that they were unable to contact their CEO to access the servers and resolve the problem.These circumstances fueled speculation that the protocol’s leadership had been arrested and that Chinese authorities had seized over $1.5 billion in smart contract funds.On May 24, data from blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence indicated a significant inflow of Multichain tokens ($MULTI) from Gate.io’s platform. In response to mounting concerns, Gate.io categorically denied any liquidity issues on May 31. The exchange asserted that its operations were running smoothly and that withdrawals were not a problem. Despite reports on Twitter and Telegram channels of traders withdrawing funds, Gate.io’s trading volume has remained relatively stable in recent days.As of now, Gate.io’s native token, GateToken ($GT), is trading at $4.01, representing a 18% decline over the past week, according to CoinGecko data. Gate.io, which although headquartered in the Cayman Islands, has recently expanded its presence to Hong Kong, Turkey, and Dubai.Multichain falloutThe ongoing issues faced by Multichain have prompted other cryptocurrency exchanges to take action. Binance, for example, suspended deposits for 10 bridged tokens on the BNB Smart Chain, Fantom, Ethereum, and Avalanche blockchain networks on May 25. Furthermore, transaction downtime compelled the Fantom Foundation to remove 449,740 $MULTI ($2.4 million) from liquidity on the decentralized exchange SushiSwap.Gate.io’s firm denial of insolvency rumors coupled with its threat of legal action underscores the exchange’s determination to combat the spread of this speculation. The exchange is seeking to protect the interests of its investors and maintain the stability of its operations.All stakeholders need to rely on continued vigilance in the crypto space. However, if Gate.io is to be afforded the benefit of the doubt in this instance, then it could be interpreted that it is demonstrating a commitment to transparency and swift action in the face of seemingly baseless rumors. On that basis, the firm’s response could be perceived as a demonstration of its resolve to navigate the challenges presented by the Multichain situation and uphold its reputation as a reliable cryptocurrency exchange.