Dunamu Collaborates with Credit Institutions to Aid Young Debtors

PantherTrade applies for Hong Kong trading licensePantherTrade (Hong Kong) Limited, a subsidiary of Futu Holdings, had been reported last month as being in the process of preparing a licensing application to trade in Hong Kong. According to recent reports in local media, it appears that the company has now submitted such an application to the Hong Kong authorities.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashKey appointmentsThis move aligns with the broader trend, as a total of six companies have submitted applications to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong. It’s understood that PantherTrade submitted its application on Nov. 15. The move follows a similar application made by Hong Kong-based Meex Holdings on Oct. 12.Key strategic appointments within PantherTrade underscore the company’s vision for its virtual asset trading venture. Chen Zhihu, former Investment Director at Huobi Asset Management (Hong Kong), has joined as a director. The corporate establishment of PantherTrade in March also saw the addition of Hong Yimin, while the initial director, Fang Xingzhi, has a background with Jingdong Securities Co., Ltd.Interest from mainland ChinaRegulatory attention has intensified on PantherTrade and another applicant, Yax, affiliated with Tiger Brokers employees, according to reports from Nikkei Asia. Yax is another platform with mainland China ties, which was reported in October as intending to apply for a license to trade within Hong Kong.It’s understood that the local entity of Chinese enterprise blockchain firm OK Group, OKX Hong Kong FinTech Company Limited, submitted its own trading license application on Nov. 16.Licensing uptakeHong Kong’s regulatory environment has undergone a significant shift, with the city granting the first licenses to cryptocurrency companies under a new framework in August of the current year. The regulatory changes, effective in 2023, allow retail investors to trade crypto on exchanges licensed by the SFC. Importantly, the city has removed the restriction on crypto trading, no longer confining it to professionals with a minimum of $1 million in bankable assets.This regulatory evolution is part of Hong Kong’s broader strategy to position itself as an international hub for cryptocurrencies. The city aims to attract fresh capital and talent, especially in the aftermath of the pandemic. The licensing race among virtual asset trading platforms signifies a pivotal phase in Hong Kong’s vision to lead the digital asset industry in Asia.There had been some short-lived concern that momentum was moving against Hong Kong’s efforts to further the Web3 sector when it emerged recently that crypto derivatives platform Bitget was exiting the Hong Kong market and abandoning efforts to secure a trading license. That concern dissipated when Bitget’s motivations became clearer, following BGX, a related Bitget entity, making an investment into BC Technology Group, the owner of the already Hong Kong-licensed OSL exchange.PantherTrade’s application for a virtual asset exchange license in Hong Kong adds momentum to the city’s evolving crypto landscape. The strategic hires and the broader industry trend highlight the growing significance of Hong Kong in the global digital asset arena. As the regulatory framework becomes more conducive, the city aims to foster innovation and become a key player in the international crypto space.

Seongnam City Hosts Seminar on Industry 4.0 AdvancementSeongnam City of Gyeonggi Province announced that it held a seminar on Tuesday under the theme “Seongnam: 50 Years Today, 50 Years Tomorrow” at the city hall to discuss the vision and prospects of the city’s identity as a technological hub for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or Industry 4.0. Some 100 individuals were in attendance, including the city’s mayor, Shin Sang-jin, and the Director of the Seongnam Research Institute, Im Jong-soon, along with other experts, citizens, and city officials.Photo by Sandro Katalina on UnsplashPath to the Fourth Industrial RevolutionFor Seongnam to develop further, Shin emphasized the need for a specific vision for the city’s future growth. “Gathering individual talent and corporations to drive innovation is the key to leading the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” he said.Shin presented seven major tasks required to achieve this goal, including the establishment of a next-generation semiconductor cluster, a bio cluster, an Industry 4.0 cluster, a special zone dedicated to blockchain and the metaverse, a metaverse platform, and a smart city, as well as a Digital Twin City project. Director Im Jong-soon pledged that the Seongnam Research Institute would support the city’s development through extensive research.During the seminar, multiple experts also gave presentations on various topics, such as the growth process of Seongnam’s industry, digital transformation, and the city’s tasks in becoming an Industry 4.0 hub.Following the presentations, a panel discussion was led by Jang Yoon-jong, a research fellow at the Korea Development Institute. The discussion included participation from Lee Kwang-yong, Head of Policy Strategy at Naver; Kim Seo-gyun, Secretary-General of the Korea Fabless Industry Association; and Kwon Soon-bum, a research fellow at the Seongnam Research Institute. The panelists engaged in a lively debate on the prospects of Seongnam’s development.Innovation and research for a vibrant futureThe Seongnam Research Institute was established on July 3, becoming the first of its kind among cities with a population of over 500,000 to provide policy alternatives and improve the quality of life for citizens through systematic research on current issues.

Korean Supreme Court acquits Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyungThe Supreme Court of South Korea, in a significant ruling on Thursday (local time), acquitted Song Chi-hyung, chairman and principal stakeholder of Dunamu, of fraud and forgery charges, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. This ruling is particularly noteworthy because Dunamu is the operator of the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.This decision, led by Justice Oh Kyung-mi, marks the culmination of a legal battle that began with Song’s indictment in Dec. 2018, and it extends to the acquittal of the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the head of the Data Value Team, who were jointly indicted.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBackground of the caseSong Chi-hyung and his colleagues were alleged to have fabricated an account on Upbit between September and November 2017. They had been accused of feigning the deposit of assets valued at KRW 122.1 billion and then employing these fictitious funds to enable transactions among actual members.The prosecution also leveled fraud charges against them, claiming that the fabricated account was utilized to sell 11,550 bitcoins to 26,000 members, thereby generating KRW 149.1 billion.The Seoul Southern District Court, acting as the court of first instance, found them not guilty. The court reasoned that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to establish that the defendants actually deposited the assets in the account.Issues with the prosecution’s evidence gatheringThe Seoul High Court, serving as the appellate court, identified problems with the evidence provided by the prosecution, determining that part of it lacked credibility due to improper collection methods. Notably, the court observed that the prosecution had directed Dunamu employees to access their Amazon cloud server to download the account’s transaction history. However, since this remote server was not included in the search and seizure warrant, the court highlighted the illegitimacy of the evidence.The appellate court also pointed out another issue with the evidence: documents stored on the CFO’s USB drive. The prosecution did not follow the legitimate search process, which requires them to extract only data related to the allegations. Moreover, the prosecutors did not present a warrant when confiscating the laptop of the Data Value Team’s lead, further undermining the credibility of their evidence.The court further stated that even if the remaining evidence provided by the prosecution was considered viable, it was still insufficient to substantiate the prosecution’s accusations.The prosecution, disagreeing with the decision of the appeals court, had escalated the case to the Supreme Court. However, the highest court in the nation sided with the ruling of the appeals court, effectively upholding the decision made at the appellate level.