Foblgate adds D’CENT and Trust as supported external wallets

American digital asset prime brokerage FalconX has unveiled its strategic expansion into Hong Kong, doubling down on its growth within the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashOTC brokerage servicesThe move, announced by the company through the release of a statement on Thursday, represents the firm’s latest stride in pursuing a global expansion strategy. In February 2023 the company announced that it was establishing its APAC headquarters in Singapore. FalconX intends to provide tailored over-the-counter (OTC) brokerage and OTC virtual asset derivatives services to professional investors in Hong Kong, including proprietary trading firms, family offices and fund managers. Leading the charge in this expansion is Belle Leung, who assumes the role of commercial lead in Hong Kong. Leung brings a wealth of experience from her previous position as head of SaaS sales for digital assets at OSL in Hong Kong. Her primary focus will be on raising awareness of FalconX’s offerings within Hong Kong's rapidly expanding institutional Web3 community.Leung expressed enthusiasm for Hong Kong's proactive regulatory approach, noting the strong market certainty it has generated. She emphasized FalconX's support for and alignment with the regulatory landscape. This expansion aligns with ongoing efforts by Hong Kong regulators to shape a conducive environment for virtual assets and related products, thereby providing market certainty and fostering innovation. The recent guidelines set by Hong Kong's regulators aim to align the region’s regulatory framework with international best practices, positioning it as a leading global center for digital asset innovation and investment. Executing an expansion strategyThe company is likely to have been planning its Hong Kong expansion for some time. Earlier this month, FalconX confirmed that it would be expanding its APAC operations. In November, the company was actively recruiting to fill Hong Kong-based positions. That same month, FalconX announced a partnership with Bullish, a digital assets exchange with 110 employees in Hong Kong. As part of that integration, the prime broker gained access to further digital asset liquidity on the Bullish platform.In its home market in the United States, the company has also been furthering its market influence. With spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) having been approved in the U.S. in January, FalconX executed over 30% of all bitcoin creation transactions for ETF issuers on the first day of trading. Matt Long, FalconX's APAC general manager, underscored the pivotal role of Hong Kong in the virtual asset innovation landscape, noting its historical significance as a hub for such innovation. He emphasized the region's leadership in the market with a clear focus on Web3 technologies. Long expressed FalconX's commitment to global growth and confidence in Hong Kong's progressive stance on virtual asset regulation and its leading position in the Web3 ecosystem. FalconX's expansion into Hong Kong follows its recent strategic moves in the Asia Pacific region, including the appointment of Ivan Lim as Trading Manager, APAC derivatives, based in the firm’s Singapore office. These developments underscore FalconX's intention to expand its footprint in the region and cater to the evolving needs of institutional investors in the digital asset space.

South Korean Prosecutors Fail to Recover Do Kwon’s AssetsSouth Korean prosecutors have disclosed that they have been unable to find the millions of dollars that Do Kwon, CEO and Founder of Terraform Labs, made from the crypto business.©Pexels/GratisographyOverseas assetsThe latest development in the case suggests that Kwon may have tried to hide his assets overseas, making it more challenging for authorities to recover those funds.Prosecutors claim that Do Kwon transferred funds from his personal accounts to overseas bank accounts under his mother’s name. Additionally, he allegedly used cryptocurrency to purchase real estate and other assets in the United States, which he then registered under his mother’s name. This tactic is commonly used by those seeking to evade detection and protect their assets from seizure.Binance halt requestSouth Korean authorities are understood to have reached out to global cryptocurrency exchange, Binance, requesting it to halt any withdrawal request associated with Kwon. Binance confirmed to CoinTelegraph that it is cooperating with the request, stating: “We provided Korean law enforcement authorities with the requested assistance. Since we cannot comment on ongoing law enforcement investigations, for any further comment please reach out to the prosecutors.”Blockchain forensicsThe situation surrounding Do Kwon’s case is not uncommon in crypto. Although there are blockchain forensic analysis specialists who collaborate with government authorities in tracing digital assets, the task is not without its difficulties. By analyzing the blockchain, investigators can trace the flow of funds and identify the individuals involved in illicit activities. This technology has already been used in a number of high-profile cases, including the 2014 Mt. Gox hack and the 2020 Twitter hack.Nevertheless, the anonymous nature of blockchain transactions makes it much easier for individuals who engage in fraudulent or illegal activities. However, as cryptocurrency becomes more mainstream, governments around the world are cracking down on those who attempt to take advantage of the system.Tightening regulationIn South Korea, authorities have been working to regulate the cryptocurrency industry and protect consumers from fraud. The government has implemented a number of measures, including requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to register with the Financial Services Commission and banning anonymous transactions. Despite these efforts, however, incidents of fraud and embezzlement continue to occur.The fight against cryptocurrency-related crime is far from over. As the industry continues to grow and evolve, criminals will continue to find new ways to exploit the system. It is up to regulators and law enforcement officials to remain vigilant and adapt to these changes in order to protect consumers and ensure the integrity of the financial system.In the case of Do Kwon, the investigation is ongoing, and it remains to be seen what the final outcome will be. Prosecutors estimate total proceeds of Do Kwon’s alleged crimes to amount to 91.4 billion won ($71 million) while 414.5 billion won ($316 million) has been identified relative to Terraform Labs more broadly.

Suspected Malicious Activity Drains AnySwap Tokens via Multichain ExecutorAccording to an on-chain sleuth known as Spreek, a person is using the Multichain Executor to drain tokens associated with the AnySwap bridging protocol.Multichain is a cross-chain routing network, established and maintained by a Chinese developer team. It supports in excess of 25 blockchains and more than 1,100 tokens.Photo by Marek Piwnicki on Unsplash$100 million outflowThis revelation comes after abnormal outflows of over $100 million from Multichain bridges on July 7, which were flagged by the Multichain team. Spreek’s report via Twitter on July 10 states that the Multichain Executor address has been draining anyToken addresses across multiple chains and transferring them to a new externally owned account (EOA).Evidence provided in the report includes an Ethereum transaction, 0x53ede4462d90978b992b0a88727de19afe4e96f0374aa1a221b8ff65fda5a6fe, which called the “anySwapFeeTo” method on the Multichain Router: V4 contract. This transaction resulted in approximately $15,275.90 worth of anyDAI being minted on Ethereum, sent to the Multichain Executor, burned, and exchanged for the underlying DAI backing the asset.The funds from these transactions were sent to the following address:0x1eed63efba5f81d95bfe37d82c8e736b974f477b. Similarly, on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), the Multichain Executor used the anySwapFeeTo function to convert $208,997 worth of anyUSDC into Binance-pegged USDC and sent them to the same address. Additionally, 50.80 anyBTC, equivalent to $39,251.43 at the time, was converted into Binance-pegged Bitcoin and sent to the address.In total, approximately $263,524.33 worth of tokens were sent to this address through the anySwapFeeTo method. Spreek suggests that this behavior could be part of the protocol’s normal functioning. However, a different account engaged in similar activity the day before and ultimately sold the drained tokens, indicating malicious intent.Potential exploitSpreek theorizes that the attacker may be exploiting the anySwapFeeTo function by setting fees to an arbitrarily large amount, allowing them to drain users’ funds. The function apparently permits setting any value, enabling the address to choose the total value of the token held in that anyToken.The Multichain incident has puzzled blockchain analysts, as it remains unclear whether it resulted from an exploit or if it was simply large token-holders moving their funds between networks. The mystery began on July 7 when over $100 million worth of tokens were withdrawn from the Ethereum side of Multichain’s bridges and transferred to wallet addresses with no prior transactions. This represented the majority of funds held on each bridge.Hack or rug pullThe Multichain team labeled these withdrawals as “abnormal” and advised users to stop using the protocol. However, they have not disclosed the source or nature of the anomaly. In response to the incident, stablecoin issuers Circle and Tether froze some of the addresses involved in the suspicious transactions. Chainanalysis, a blockchain analytics firm, has commented that the incident appears more like a hack or rug pull rather than a migration.Adding to the complexity, the Multichain team has reported that their CEO is missing, and they have shut down certain bridges due to losing access to some of the network’s multi-party computation network servers. There have been various concerns relative to Multichain since May. The situation continues to evolve, with ongoing investigations and efforts to mitigate any potential damage caused by the suspected malicious activity.