Top

3AC Co-founder offers unusual perspective on Singapore prison time

Policy & Regulation·January 24, 2024, 2:17 AM

Su Zhu, the co-founder of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), raised some eyebrows within the crypto community recently, having shared unconventional thoughts on his time spent in a Singaporean prison.

 

Zhu's arrest took place in October of last year in Singapore, where he was apprehended while attempting to flee. Liquidators of 3AC had tipped off police in the city-state that Zhu was going to Changi airport, a number of days after they had secured a court order against him for failing to cooperate with their efforts to wind up the company. Alongside his business partner, Kyle Davies, Zhu was sentenced to four months in prison for contempt of court following a committal order.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/f6be5396a8536b3d223218f91cf39cc2.webp
Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

‘Enjoyable experience’

Clips from an unreleased podcast were published on social media on Monday, in which Zhu referred to his time in prison as an "enjoyable experience overall." In the video podcast, Zhu expressed gratitude for his incarceration, even going so far as to claim that he had the "best sleep" of his life while behind bars.

 

Zhu suggested that everyone should have the opportunity to experience prison at least once, believing it to be a beneficial and enlightening experience. He provided insights into his daily life during incarceration, emphasizing the simplicity of entertainment and drawing parallels with activities from "ancient days."

 

The disgraced crypto boss discussed the routines and privileges within the prison facility, including access to ample reading material, opportunities for exercise and a structured diet. He highlighted the ability to read books and engage in physical activities like push-ups during his time in prison.

 

What particularly impressed Zhu was the quality of sleep in the prison environment. He also found a sense of connection with his ancestors through the use of mats instead of beds.

 

Crypto community response

Crypto users on various platforms responded with mixed feelings toward Zhu's philosophical insights. Some viewed his perspective with skepticism, while others found humor in the apparent contrast between his experiences and traditional notions of imprisonment.

 

Taking to the X social media platform, pseudonymous crypto restructuring lawyer "Wassielawyer" wrote:

”Singapore prison is widely regarded as one of the shittiest prisons you can find in a first world country. And the man made it sound like a 5-star mindfulness retreat everyone needs to go on in order to revitalize mind, body and soul. Man is blessed with a superpower…”

 

The hedge fund collapsed in June 2022, resulting in over $3.5 billion in losses for investors, making it one of the largest hedge-fund trading losses ever. Zhu and fellow 3AC founder Kyle Davies have been active online over the course of the past year, despite their whereabouts largely remaining unknown during that time.

 

The duo have launched a new crypto exchange and bankruptcy claims platform called Open Exchange (OPNX). However, their troubles continue, as liquidator Teneo seeks to recover $1.3 billion directly from the founders, alleging misuse of investor funds after 3AC became insolvent. In September, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) prohibited both from floating regulated investments for nine years. Teneo has estimated a 46% recovery rate in respect of creditor claims.

 

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

May 11, 2023

3AC Founder Secures Restraining Order in Singapore

3AC Founder Secures Restraining Order in SingaporeSu Zhu, the Co-Founder of the defunct crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) has successfully obtained a restraining order against BitMEX Co-Founder and former CEO, Arthur Hayes, in a Singaporean court.Photo by Monstera on PexelsNo communication “by any means”Crypto publication CoinDesk stated on Wednesday that it had seen a copy of the court order, which was originally issued on May 5. According to the details of the order, Hayes is prohibited from “making any threatening, abusive or insulting communication that would cause the Applicant harassment, alarm or distress.”Additionally, the former CEO of crypto trading platform BitMEX is forbidden from using “threatening, abusive or insulting words” in relation to Su Zhu. The order, which was issued by Judge Sandra Looi Ai Lin, clarifies that the BitMEX Co-Founder is not permitted to publish “any identity information” relative to Zhu or to communicate with him “by any means.”$6 million owedIt’s an understatement to say that Zhu, alongside fellow 3AC founder Kyle Davies, are not on Hayes’ list of favorite people in recent times. Following the 3AC collapse, Hayes has maintained that he is owed $6 million by the duo. Since the collapse of the hedge fund, Hayes has been tweeting out at the pair, calling them out relative to his claim that the duo have a debt obligation to him to the tune of $6 million.While both Hayes and Zhu have blemishes on their records, Hayes is much better regarded within the crypto community than Zhu. The BitMEX Co-Founder narrowly avoided a prison sentence in 2022 with the much lesser sanction of six months home detention being applied. That arose due to federal charges brought against him on the basis that he didn’t implement anti money laundering (AML) compliance procedures and checks at BitMEX while he was CEO of the firm.Despite this failure, Hayes remains popular within the crypto space, with his insightful commentary being lauded given that since he left BitMEX he has taken to writing blog articles relative to crypto and the broader economic situation. However, blog site Medium has taken to disabling access to his most recent blog article. The blog page states that the post “is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules.”Lacking a welcomeIn contrast with Hayes, commentary relative to the 3AC duo of Zhu and Davies has lacked warmth. Neither of the duo had jumped on social media for a number of months following the collapse of 3AC. More recently they have both tried to rehabilitate themselves, with many commentators within the space seeing it as a cynical move.In February the duo launched Open Exchange, more commonly known as OPNX, a trading platform for crypto-related bankruptcy claims. At that time, Hayes tweeted out that he interpreted the news as the return of the crypto bull market.Earlier this month, OPNX claimed that it had the backing of several credible entities in the crypto space. However, immediately afterwards, a number of those firms clarified that they had nothing to do with the startup.Meanwhile, crypto-focused venture capital investor Michael Arrington tweeted out his disdain in relation to the 3AC founder’s successful fund raise:“Three f***ing arrows dip****s successfully raising a new fund is the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.”The regulator in Dubai has also failed to roll out the red carpet for the duo’s new venture. In April, it issued an investor alert in relation to OPNX. Subsequently, it has followed up with a formal written reprimand issued to Zhu and Davies, given that the business is not registered with the regulator although operating out of Dubai.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 08, 2023

Korea’s Code Launches System to Detect Blacklisted Crypto Wallets

Korea’s Code Launches System to Detect Blacklisted Crypto WalletsCode, the only Travel Rule solution provider in South Korea, announced on Monday the launch of Protector, a detection system designed to identify blacklisted wallets in the cryptocurrency space. Established by a collaboration between three major Korean cryptocurrency exchanges (Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit), Code aims to enhance security and compliance in the industry.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashTravel RuleThe Travel Rule is a regulation that requires financial institutions to share information with each other about transactions to ensure their legitimacy and to prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit activities.Wallet risk assessmentsThe Protector system of Code allows its members to assess risks associated with external wallets and take appropriate measures during the withdrawal and deposit of virtual assets. Risks will be categorized into three levels, represented by the colors white, gray, and black. A white designation signifies a normal status, gray serves as a warning, and black indicates a danger.Not only does Protector enable members to manage risks linked to crypto wallets more effectively, it also allows them to monitor the management status of Code’s Travel Rule.Streamlining regulatory complianceCode CEO Lee Sung-mi stated that the recently launched Protector system is designed to streamline regulatory compliance for Code members. By utilizing Protector, members can concentrate on their projects without being burdened by compliance concerns. Lee also emphasized that Code is committed to expanding its range of services for members in the future.The detection system was developed and is operated in partnership with Uppsala Security, a Singapore-based cybersecurity company specializing in blockchain-powered solutions.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jun 20, 2023

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own Platform

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

news
Loading